Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2010 | 3 | 1 | 51-62

Article title

Humour as Indirect Influence: Different Types of Managers' Sense of Humour and Psychological climate in a Team

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Introduction. This article examines whether different levels and types of managers' sense of humour influence psychological climate in a work team.The Aim of the Study. To investigate whether different levels out of four humour styles (affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, and self-defeating) and managers' sense of humour influence the psychological climate in a team of employees.Materials and Methods. Four varieties of sense of humour were investigated: affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, and self-defeating as well as the aggregate multidimensional sense of humour. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANCOVA) was used with a factorial 2 x (gender) x 2 (age) x 2 (humour) as independent variables and level of psychological climate (Support and Involvement scales) in work group as a dependent variable, and EQ interpersonal factor as covariate.Results and Discussion. Female managers' sense of humour does not affect psychological climate in a work team indicating that the subordinates do not appreciate (or simply ignore) females' sense of humour. This conforms to the researches identifying prejudges against female managers. Some research papers state that the managers' role is perceived and explained through traits which are more often attributed to males than females. For male managers sense of humour is linked to the subordinates' willingness to be involved in work, indicating that subordinates appreciate and estimate that the manager has a sense of humour and they are more eager to take up their work roles when the supervisor is understanding and supportive. Controlling of the age factor revealed that sense of humour is important only for young male managers (those under 40); managers with a good sense of humour are perceived as supportive by the subordinates. For older managers (41 and above) no significant differences were found; that means that humour can help if a manager does not have much experience as it in the case with young managers.

Publisher

Journal

Year

Volume

3

Issue

1

Pages

51-62

Physical description

Dates

published
2010-03-01
online
2011-10-20

Contributors

author
  • Riga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy, Latvia

References

  • Brown, S., Leigh, T. W. (1996) A New Look at Psychological Climate and Its Relationship to Job Involvement, Effort, and Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, No 81, p. 358-368.[Crossref]
  • Cogliser, C. C., Schriesheim, C. A. (2000) Exploring Work Unit Context and Leader-Member Exchange: A Multi-Level Perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, No 21, p. 487-511.[Crossref]
  • Cohen, S. G., Bailey, D. E. (1997) What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite. Journal of Management, No 23, p. 239-290.
  • Collinson, D. L. (2002) Managing Humour. Journal of Management Studies, May, Vol. 39, Issue 3, p. 269-302.
  • Decker, W. H., Rotondo, D. M. (2001) Relationships among Gender, Type of Humour, and Perceived Leader Effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(4), p. 450-465.
  • Department of the Army (1983) FM22-100: Military Leadership.
  • Dragoni, L. (2005) Understanding the Emergence of State Goal Orientation in Organizational Work Groups: The Role of Leadership and Multi-Level Climate Perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, No 90, p. 1084-1095.[Crossref]
  • Duncan, W. J., Feisal, J. P. (1989) No Laughing Matter: Patterns of Humour in the Workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 17(4), p. 18-30.[Crossref]
  • Duncan, W. J., Smeltzer, L. R., Leap, T. L. (1990) Humour and Work: Applications of Joking Behavior to Management. Journal of Management, 16(2), p. 255-278.
  • Goffman, E. (1961) Encounters. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 450 p.
  • Griffith, R. W., Hom, P. W., Gaertner, S. (2000) A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium. Journal of Management, No 26, p. 463-88.
  • Hatch, M. J., Ehrlich, S. B. (1993) Spontaneous Humour as an Indicator of Paradox and Ambiguity in Organizations. Organization Studies, 14(4), p. 505-526.[Crossref]
  • Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V. (2003) LMX and Teamwork: The Challenges and Opportunities of Diversity. In: G. B. Graen (Ed.), Dealing with Diversity. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing, p. 29-57.
  • James, L. R., James, L. A., Ashe, D. K. (1990) The Meaning of Organizations: the Role of Cognition and Values. In: B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture. San Erancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. p. 335.
  • James, L. R., Jones, A. P. (1974) Organizational Climate: a Review of Theory and Research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, p. 1096-1112.[Crossref]
  • James, L. R., Jones, A. P. (1980) Perceived Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction: an Examination of Reciprocal Causation. Personnel Psychology, 33, p. 97-135.[Crossref]
  • James, L. R., Sells, S. B. (1981) Psychological Climate: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Research. In: D. Magnusson (Ed.) Toward a Psychology of Situations: An Interactional Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, p. 275-292.
  • James, L. R., Tetrick, L. E. (1986) Confirmatory Analytic Tests of three Causal Models Relating Job Perceptions to Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, p. 77-82.[Crossref]
  • Judge, T. A., Thoreson, C., Bono, J. E., Patton, G. K. (2001) The Job Satisfaction-Job Performance Relationsbip: a Qualitative and Quantitative Review. Psychological Bulletin. 127, p. 376-407.
  • Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., Heerey, E. A. (2001) Just Teasing: A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), p. 229-248.[WoS][Crossref][PubMed]
  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., Doherty, M. L. (1989) Integration of Climate and Leadership: Examination of a Neglected Issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, p. 546-553.[Crossref]
  • Lawler, E. E., Hall, D. T., Oldham, G. R. (1974) Organizational Climate: Relationship to Organizational Structure, Process and Performance. Organizational Behavior and Performance, 11, p. 139-155.
  • Long, D. L., Graesser, A. C. (1988) Wit and Humour in Discourse Processing. Discourse Processes, 11(1), p. 35-60.[Crossref]
  • Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., Weir, K. (2003) Individual Differences in Uses of Humour and Their Relation to Psychological Well-Being: Development of the Humour Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, p. 48-75.[Crossref]
  • Martineau, W. H. (1972) A Model of the Social Functions of Humour. In: J. H. Goldstein, P. E. McGhee (Eds.) The Psychology of Humour: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues. New York: Academic Press, p. 101-125.
  • Mathieu, J. E., Hoffman, D. A., Farr, J. L. (1993) Job Perceptions-Job Satisfaction Relations: an Empirical Comparison of Three Competing Theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56, p. 370-387.[Crossref]
  • Moen, P., Yu, Y. (2000) Effective Work/Life Strategies: Working Couples, Work Conditions, Gender, and Life Quality. Social Problems, 47, p. 291-326.[Crossref]
  • Morreall, J. (1991) Humour and Work. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 4(3-4), p. 359-373.
  • Muchinsky, P. M. (1977) Organizational Communication: Relationships to Organizational Climate and Job Satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 20, p. 592-607.[Crossref]
  • Mulkay, M. (1988) On Humour: Its Nature and its Place in Modern Society. New York: Basil Blackwell, 267 p.
  • Organ, D. C. (1988) Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 237 p. 32.
  • Patterson, M. G., Warr, P. B., West, M. A. (2004) Organizational Climate and Company Performance: the Role of Employee Affect and Employee Level. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, p. 193-216.[Crossref]
  • Peterson, R. S., Behfar, K. J. 2005. Leadership as Group Regulation. In: D. M. Messick, R. M. Kramer (Eds.), The Psychology of Leadership: New Perspectives and Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, p. 143-162.
  • Priest, R. F., Swain, J. E. (2002) Humour and Its Implications for Leadership Effectiveness. Humour: International Journal of Humour Research, 15(2), p. 169-189.
  • Pritchard, R. D., Karasick, B. W. (1973) The Effects of Organizational Climate on Managerial Job Performance and Satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, p. 126-146.[Crossref]
  • Rentsch, J. (1990) Climate and Culture: Interaction and Qualitative Differences in Organizational Meanings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, p. 668-681.[Crossref]
  • Robinson, D. T., Smith-Lovin, L. (2001) Getting a Laugh: Gender, Status, and Humour in Task Discussions. Social Forces, 80(1), p. 123-158.[Crossref]
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1988) The Construction of Climate in Organizational Research. In: C. L. Cooper, I. T. Robertson (Eds.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3. New York: Wiley, p. 139-158.
  • Roze, J. (2007) Relation between Styles of Humour and Emotional Intelligence. Presentation on 13th European Conference on Developmental Psychology, Jena, Germany, 21.- 25.08.2007.
  • Sayre, J. (2001) The Use of Aberrant Medical Humour by Psychiatric Unit Staff. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 22(7), p. 669-689.
  • Schneider, B. (1990) The Climate for Service: An Application of the Climate Construct. In: B. Schneider (Ed.) Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, p. 383-409.
  • Schneider, B., Reichers, A. E. (1983) On the Etiology of Climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, p. 19-39.[Crossref]
  • Scott, S. G., Bruce, R. A. (1994) Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, p. 580-608.[Crossref]
  • Sherony, K. M., Green, S. G. (2002) Coworker Exchange: Relationships between Coworkers, Leader-Member Exchange, and Work Attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, p. 542-548.[Crossref]
  • Smeltzer, L. R., Leap, T. L. (1988) An Analysis of Individual Reactions to Potentially Offensive Jokes in Work Settings. Human Relations, 41, p. 295-304.[Crossref]
  • Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C. (1997) Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, p. 522-552.
  • Thorson, J. A., Powell, F. C. (1993) Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Sense of Humour Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, p. 13-23.[Crossref]
  • Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., Scandura, T. A. (2000) Implications of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) for Strategic Human Resource Management Systems: Relationships as Social Capital for Competitive Advantage. In: G. R. Ferris (Ed.) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management. Vol. 18, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, p. 137-185.
  • Yip, J. A., Martin, R. A., (2006) Sense of Humour, Emotional Intelligence, and Social Competence. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 6, p. 1202-1208.[Crossref]

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10195-011-0034-5
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.