Student-Perceived Epistemic Authority of Associate Professors in Institutions of Higher Education

• Authors: Solveiga Blumberga
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article analyses the topical social epistemology issue of transmission and sharing of knowledge in the context of social psychology. Essential is focusing on authority as an attitude and, within this context, also focusing on an analysis of the structure of authority, situational structuring of authority. Therefore, the aim of the study is to explore the epistemic authority of associate professors in institutions of higher education as perceived by the students of various study areas. The concept of epistemic authority has been used to pursue the aim (Raviv, Bar-Tal, Ravi & Abin, 1993; Kruglanski, 1989; Hepburn, 2006; Asmuß & Svennevig, 2009; Glenn & LeBaron, 2011). Exploring epistemic authority is related to exploring the degree of trust in epistemic authority (Kruglanski et al., 2005). An epistemic authority study methodology including three interrelated surveys has been used in the study (Raviv, Bar-Tal, Raviv & Abin, 1993). The study sample consisted of students of various institutions of higher education in Riga (N=307). The article analyses the results of the descriptive statistics of student-perceived epistemic authority of associate professors; statistically significant differences between the evaluations given by students of various areas for their perception of the epistemic authority of associate professors. The article includes key conclusions which show that students rate the epistemic authority of associate professors as medium high, it is comparatively higher in the cognitive aspect - evaluation of the authority’s level of knowledge and the cognitively emotional, i.e., trust in knowledge. The students have given a lower rating to the epistemic authority of associate professors in the cognitive behaviour aspect.

Keywords

EN

epistemic authority; epistemic beliefs; perceived authority; students; professors

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Signum Temporis
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 4
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 10-16

Dates

published

2011-12-01

online

2013-02-01

Contributors

author

Solveiga Blumberga

• Daugavpils University, Latvia

References

• Asmuß, B., & Svennevig, J. (2009). Meeting talk: An introduction. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 3-22.[Crossref]
• Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Raviv, A. & Brosh, M. (1991). Perception of epistemic authority and attribution for its choice as a function of knowledge area and age. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 477-492.
• Bozalek, V. & Matthews, L. (2009). E-learning: A cross-institutional forum for sharing socio-cultural influences on personal and professional identity. International Social Work, 52, 235-246.[WoS][Crossref]
• Buehl, M. M. & Alexander, A. P. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697-726.[Crossref]
• Chiang, S. Y. (2009). Personal power and positional power in a power-full ‘I’: A discourse analysis of doctoral dissertation supervision. Discourse & Communication, 3(3), 255-271.[WoS]
• Fuko, M. (2001). Uzraudzīt un sodīt [Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison]. Rīga: Omnia mae. (in Latvian).
• Glenn, P., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Epistemic authority in employment interviews: Glancing, pointing, touching. Discourse & Communication, 5(1), 3-22.[WoS]
• Goodman, J. (2010). Student authority: Antidote to alienation. Theory and Research in Education, 8, 227-247.
• Guimond, S. (2001). Epistemic authorities in higher education: The relative influence of peers, faculty and courses on attitude formation and change. In F.Butera & G.Mugny (Eds.), Social influence in socialreality (pp.211-223). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
• Harjunen, E. (2009). How do teachers view their own pedagogical authority? Teachers and Teaching, 15(1), 109-129.
• Hepburn, A. (2006). Getting closer at a distance: theory and the contingencies of practice. Theory Psychology, 16, 327-342.[Crossref]
• Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15-38.[Crossref]
• Jacobson, N. (2007). Social epistemology: Theory for the ’’fourth wave’’ of knowledge transfer and exchange research. Science Communication, 29, 116-127.[WoS][Crossref]
• Jillapalli, K. R. & Wilcox, B. J. (2010). Professor brand advocacy: Do brand relationships matter? Journal ofMarketing Education, 32, 328-340.[Crossref]
• Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
• Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Ellis, S., Bar, R., Pierro, A. & Mannetti, L. (2005). Says who?: Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances inExperimental Social Psychology, 37 (pp.346-392). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.[WoS]
• Mahrous, A. A., & Ahmed Anis, A. (2010). A cross-cultural investigation of students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of pedagogical tools: The Middle East, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education, 14, 289-306.[WoS]
• Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12, 437-456.[Crossref]
• Mugny, G., Chatard, A., Quiamzade, A. (2006). The social transmission of knowledge at the university: teaching style and epistemic dependence. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(4), 413-427.[Crossref]
• Ordonez, G. X., Ponsoda, V., Abad, J. F. & Romero, J. S. (2009). Measurement of epistemological beliefs: psychometric properties of the EQEBI test scores. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 287-302.[WoS]
• Patchen, T. & Crawford, T. (2011). From gardeners to tour guides: The epistemological struggle revealed in teacher-generated metaphors of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 286-298.[Crossref][WoS]
• Pounder, S. J. (2008). Full-range classroom leadership: Implications for the cross-organizational and crosscultural applicability of the transformational-transactional paradigm. Leadership, 4, 115-135.[Crossref][WoS]
• Quiamzade, A., Mugny, G., Chatard, A. (2009). When teaching style matches students’ epistemic (in) dependence: The moderating effect of perceived epistemic gap. European Journal of Psychology of Education,XXIV(3), 361-371.[WoS]
• Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv A., & Abin, R. (1993). Measuring epistemic authority: studies of politicians and professors. European Journal of Personality, 7, 119-138.[Crossref]
• Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., Biran, B., & Sela, Z. (2003). Teachers’ epistemic authorities: perceptions of students and teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 6 (1), 17-42.[Crossref]
• Raviv, A., Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Peleg, D. (1990). Perception of epistemic authorities by children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 495-510.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Ricco, R., Schuyten Pierce, S., & Medinilla, C. (2010). Epistemic beliefs and achievement motivation in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(2), 305-340.[Crossref][WoS]
• Rupp, E. D. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 72-94.[Crossref]
• Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief system: introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19-29.[Crossref]
• Subramaniam, B. (2010). Imperfect oracle: the epistemic and moral authority of science. contemporary sociology. A Journal of Reviews, 39(6), 687-688.[WoS]
• Ward, L., & Parr, J. (2006). Authority, volunteerism, and sustainability: creating and sustaining an online community through teacher leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(2), 109-129.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10195-011-0040-7