THE INFLUENCE MODEL OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION ON KNOWLEDGE QUALITY

• Authors: Valentyna Shvets
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The influence model of knowledge representation and training character testing in MOODLE on progress of students has been investigated in the article. The knowledge representation in the form of graphs and frames is able to raise the level of knowledge significantly. The using of the animation (in Flash and SketchUp) leads to better memorization of information owing subconscious reaction of students. The testing of students in training conditions of e-learning platform MOODLE makes more active the programme of the intellectual curiosity that is the function of the brain.

Keywords

EN

representation of knowledge; frame; graph; MOODLE

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Signum Temporis
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 30-36

Dates

published

2012-06-01

online

2014-03-25

Contributors

author

Valentyna Shvets

• Institute of Professional and Technical Education of National Ukraine Pedagogical Academy, Ukraine

References

• Minsky, M. (1975) A framework for representing knowledge. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (3), 598-610.
• Park, J. (2005). Learning in a new computerized testing system. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (3), 436-443.
• Paynter, H. (1961). Analysis and design of engineering system. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
• Szwec, W. (2007). E-learningowy podręcznik „Podstawy fizyki klasycznej” dla edukacji na odległość [E-learning book „Foundations of classical physics”]. In: „Komputer w Edukacji” Materiały 17 Ogólnopolskie Symp. Nauk., 28.-29.09.2007. (pp. 242-248). Kraków, Polska: Akademia Pedagogiczna im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej (in Polish).
• Wilson, M., Scalise, K. (2006). Assessment to improve learning in high education: The BEAR assessment system higher education. International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 52 (4), 635-66.
• Амосов, Н. (1979). Алгоритмы разума [The algorithms of the mind]. К.: Наукова думка. (in Ukrainian).
• Гальперин, П. (2008). Психология как объективная наука [Psychology as an objective science]. Москва, Воронеж: Изд. дом. Российской академии образования (in Russian).
• Гребнев, Л. (2004). Высшее образование в Болонском измерении: российские особенности и ограничения [Higher education in the Bologna measurement: russian features and limitations]. Высшее образование в России, No 1, 36-42. (in Russian).
• Швец, В. Д. (2012). Физика в школе и ВУЗе [The physics in the school and in the highschool]. Retrieved 24.11.2012 from http://www.high-physics.com (in Russian).
• Швець, В. (2010). Програмування навчальної діяльності студентів у процесі вивчення фізики в умовах інформаційного суспільства [Programming learning activities of students in the study of physics in the information society]. К.: Видавництво Національного педагогічного університету імені М.П. Драгоманова. (in Ukrainian).
• Жуков, Д. (2006). Математические модели управления знаниями в информационных обучающих системах [Mathematical models of knowledge management in information systems training]. Doctoral thesis. Московский государственный университет приборостроения и информатики. Москва, 344 с. (in Russian).

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10195-011-0048-z