Pronouns in Estonian Child Language

• Authors: Maigi Vija , Renate Pajusalu
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Pronouns are words that fall on the boundaries of vocabulary and grammar. They possess several distinctive characteristics that are important for language acquisition. First, since the referent of a pronoun only becomes apparent in context, the interpretation of pronouns requires a specific kind of information. In order to understand to whom I, you or this refer, we need to know the whole communicative situation. This fact should still not complicate language acquisition too much, because the child's language development starts with ‘here and now’. Yet, the acquisition of a pragmatico-grammatical complex of pronouns is bound to take time due to the variety of pronoun functions involved. On the one hand, the referents of pronouns (especially those of speech act pronouns mina ‘I’ and sina ‘you:2SG’) change constantly, making an exact repetition of what an adult said, in most cases, impossible for the child. On the other hand, the areas of use of certain pronouns (e.g., those expressing definiteness) require the mastery of narrative principles. There are also studies that show that the acquisition of pronouns after the critical age is especially difficult or even impossible (see the discussion of Genie's case in Lust 2006: 95).This article gives an analysis of the acquisition of Estonian personal and demonstrative pronouns. In Estonian, similarly to many other languages, a group of frequently used pronouns functions as a device for minimal reference and for determining noun phrases for referential needs of ongoing discourse. The group consists of different types of pronouns: personal (mina, sina, tema, meie, teie, nemad), demonstrative (see), possessive (oma), and quantificational (üks, mingi). In addition, there are also some adverbs used for deictic reference, for example those of spatial reference (siin ‘here’, seal ‘there’, etc.). Some of these pro-words are typically used in deictic contexts and refer to entities present in the physical context (1 and 2sg personal pronouns and demonstratives); others refer primarily anaphorically (3rd person pronoun and demonstratives), and typically have an antecedent in the ongoing discourse. The same pronouns (except personal) can function as determiners very much like articles in Indo-European languages. Thus, we can see a group of core prowords that are frequent and have different functions. An overview of these devices of pronominal reference is given in Pajusalu (in press).

Keywords

EN

first language acquisition; pronouns; demonstratives; determiners

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Ad verba liberorum
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 23-31

Dates

published

2009-05-01

online

2012-08-21

Contributors

author

Maigi Vija

• University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

author

Renate Pajusalu

• University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

References

• Argus, R. (2008) Eesti keele muutemorfoloogia omandamine [Mastering the Changes in the Estonian Language Morphology]: Tallinna Ülikooli humanitaarteaduste dissertatsioonid 19. Tallinn: Tallinn University Press (in Estonian).
• Argus, R. (in press). The early development of case and number in Estonian. In: Voeikova, M. D., Stephany, U. (eds.) Acquisition of Case and number in Typological Perpective. Berlin: Mounton de Gruyter.
• Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meanings of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
• CHILDES (10.11.2008), from
• Dabrowska, E. (2004). Language, Mind and Brain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kaiser, E. & Hiietam, K. (2003). A comparison of the referential properties of the third person pronouns in Finnish and Estonian. Nordlyd 31.4, pp. 654-667.
• Laak, A. (2006). Pronoomeneid üks, mingi ja see sisaldavad fraasid laste keeles [NP-s Containing Pronouns ‘One’, ‘Some’ and ‘This’]. Unpublished BA Thesis, Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics, University of Tartu (in Estonian).
• Lyons, Ch. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Pajusalu, R. (2009). Pronouns and reference in Estonian. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung.
• Pajusalu, R. (1997). Is there an article in (spoken) Estonian? In: Erelt, Mati (ed.) Estonian Typological Studies II (pp. 146-177). Publications of the Department of Estonian of the University of Tartu 8. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
• Pajusalu, R. (2001). Definite and indefinite determiners in Estonian. Enikö Németh, T. (ed.) Pragmatics in 2000 (pp. 458-469). Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference. Vol. 2. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.
• Pajusalu, R. (2005). Anaphoric pronouns in spoken Estonian. In: Laury, Ritva (ed.) Minimal reference. The use of pronouns in Finnish and Estonian discourse (pp. 107-134). Studia Fennica. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. A Usage-Based Theory of language Acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
• Vihman, M. M. (1997). The acquisition of accent: a framework for the study of Estonian prosodic development. In: Lehiste, I., Ross, J. (eds). Estonian Prosody: Papers from a Symposium (pp. 203-221). Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language.
• Vija, M. (2005). Asesõnad ja isikuviitamine lapsekeeles [Pronouns and Personal Reference in Child Language]. Unpublished MA Thesis, Institute of Estonian and General Linguistics. Tartu: University of Tartu (in Estonian).
• Vija, M. (2007). Pronoomenid lapsekeeles: mõnda MINA ja SINA omandamisest [Pronouns in child language: some fragments of a study of the acquisition of pronouns mina and sina by Estonian children]. In: Rakenduslingvistika aastaraamat [Yearbook of Applied Linguistics] (pp. 373-384). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus (in Estonian).

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10196-011-0003-4