PL EN


2009 | 1 | 1 | 40-47
Article title

Emergence of Case Meanings in Russian - Empirical Evidence from One Month, from One Child

Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Introduction The article presents emergence of case marking on nouns and development of case meanings within one month in the acquisition of Russian. For this purpose density recordings of 1;9 were extracted from longitudinal data of Liza E. As revealed by the analysis, within less than one month the inflections of all cases occur in singular. Data show that the emergence of case marking and case meanings take place parallel to a continuous use of one-word utterances. Rich inflectional morphology (being combined with sufficient lexicon) compensates for the poverty of argument structure and the complexity of an utterance. The child does not need several components in the utterance to make it clear.Aim of the study Beyond a descriptive goal, this study aims at tracing order of the emergence of case meanings at age 1;09 with one child. At the same time it gives brief information about the early lexicon, number of components of utterances and lexical spurt in nouns and case meanings around age 1;09.Materials and methods Longitudinal videotaped recordings of Liza E. at the age of one month were used. All density recordings from 1;09 were divided according to the equal intervals, so that the occurrence of all case forms and meanings during 27 days was traced.Results The data provide evidence for the emergence of all case forms and a broad range of case meanings within approx. one month. This intensive increase within a relatively short period of time can be called an inflectional spurt in noun case inflection and case meanings. Earlier, at 1;08, a vocabulary spurt in Liza was documented. The intensive development in the domain of the lexicon and noun morphology around 1;09 was not documented for syntax: the number of utterance components stayed at the level of one or two words. Thus, our empirical data do not corroborate the co-development hypothesis of Rispoli (1999), who proposes co-development of case marking and agreement of subjects with verbs.The order of the emergence of cases is NOM, ACC, LOC, GEN, DAT, and INST. These case meanings occur gradually, despite the restricted interval between their first occurrences.Conclusions Our empirical data do not corroborate the co-development hypothesis of Rispoli (1999), who proposes the co-development of case marking and agreement of subjects with verbs. We presented only the initial occurrences of case meanings and did not treat the contrastive case oppositions, so the question about factors determining the acquisition of a given form or category stays beyond the scope of the present article. The order of occurrence of case forms and meanings in general does corroborate previous findings on the acquisition of cases in other languages (see, for example (Szagun 2004; Tracy 1986; Voeikova, Dressler 2002)).
Publisher
Year
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
40-47
Physical description
Dates
published
2009-05-01
online
2012-08-21
Contributors
  • Center for General Linguistics, Berlin, Germany
  • Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St. Petersburg, Russia
References
  • Babyonyshev, M. (1993). The acquisition of Russian case. In: Phillips, C. (ed.). Papers on Case and Agreement II. (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19) (pp. 1-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  • Bowerman, M. (1980). The structure and origin of semantic categories in the language learning child. In: Foster, M. L., Brandes, S. H. (eds.) Symbol as sense: New approaches to the analysis of meaning. New York: Academic Press.
  • Bowerman, M. (1985). What shapes children's grammar? In: Slobin, D. I. (ed.) The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition (pp. 1257-1319). Hillsdale.
  • Dressler, W. U. (1997a). Introduction. In: Kolaczyk, K. (ed.) Pre- and Protomorphology in Language Acquisition (pp. 7-14). Dziubalska-Poznan: Adam Mickiewicz University.
  • Dressler, W. U. (1997b). Studies in Pre- and Protomorphology. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
  • Dressler, W. U., Karpf, A. (1994; 1995). The theoretical relevance of pre- and protomorphology in language acquisition: Yearbook of Morphology, pp. 99-122.
  • Gagarina, N. (2003). The early verb development and demarcation of stages in three Russian-speaking children. In: Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U., Kilani-Schoch, M. (eds.) Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. (pp. 131-169). Berlin: de Gruyter.
  • Gagarina, N., Voeikova, M. (in press). Acquisition of case and number in Russian. In: Stephany, U., Voeikova, M. (eds.) Cross-linguistic approaches to the acquisition of case and number. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
  • Goldfield, B., Reznick, S. (1990). Early Lexical Acquisition: Rate, Content, and the Vocabulary Spurt. Journal of Child Language. Vol. 17, pp. 171-183.
  • MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Vol. I: Transcription, Format and Programs, p. 458.
  • Mervis, C., Bertrand, J. (1995). Early Lexical Acquisition and the Vocabulary Spurt: A Response to Goldfield and Reznick. Journal of Child Language. Vol. 22, pp. 461-468.
  • Rispoli, M. (1999). Case and agreement in English language development. Journal of Child Language. Vol. 26, pp. 357-372.
  • Slobin, D. I. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In: Slobin, D. I. (ed.) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 1157-1256). Vol. II: Theoretical issues. Hillsdale/ New Jersey/ London: Erlbaum.
  • Szagun, G. (2004). Learning by ear: On the acquisition of case and gender marking by German-speaking children with cochlear implants and with normal hearing. Journal of Child Language. Vol. 31, pp. 1-30.
  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 388.
  • Tracy, R. (1986). The acquisition of case morphology in German. Linguistics. Vol. 24, pp. 47-78.
  • Voeikova, M., Dressler, W. U. (2002). Introduction. In: Voeikova, M., Dressler, W. U. (eds.) Pre- and protomorphology: early phases of morphological development in nouns and verbs (pp. 3-5). München: Lincom.
  • Voeikova, M., Gagarina, N. (2002). MLU, first lexicon, and the early stages in the acquisition of case forms by two Russian children. In: Voeikova, M., Dressler, W. U. (eds.) LINCOM studies in theoretical linguistics 29: Pre- and Protomorphology. Early Phases of Morphological Development in Nouns and Verbs (pp. 115-131). München: Lincom.
  • Гагарина, Н. (in print). Становление грамматических категорий глагола в детской речи [First language acquisition of verb categories in Russian]. Санкт - Петербург: Наука (in Russian).
  • Зализняк, A. A. (1977). Грамматический словарь русского языка [Grammatical dictionary of the Russian language]. Москва: Русский язык, с. 879 (in Russian).
  • Золотова, Г. (1988) Синтаксический словарь русского языка [The syntactic dictionary of Russian]. Москва: Наука, с. 439 (in Russian).
  • Ионова, Н. В. (2007). Семантические функции падежных форм и предложно - падежных конструкций имени существительного в речи детей дошкольного возраста [Semantic functions of case forms and prepositional phrases in the speech of preschool children]: PhD dissertation. Череповец, с. 145 (in Russian).
  • Лепская, Н. И. (1988). Освоение детьми категории падежа [Acquisition of the category of case by children]. In: Sahnarovic, A. M. (ed.) Семантика в речевой деятельности на материале онтогенеза [Semantics in the speech activity in the material of ontogenesis] (pp. 48-58). Москва: АН СССР, Институт языкознания (in Russian).
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10196-011-0005-2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.