Where Does Child Language End and Adolescent Language Begin?

• Authors: Laura Tidriķe
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Introduction Adolescent language is a form of linguistic self-identification expressed most vividly in oral and written speech of adolescents' mutual communication in informal situations and it varies depending on sociological factors (speaker's gender, age, education, belonging to a specific group of youths etc.). Adolescents' age group nowadays includes individuals between 13 and 30.Aim of the study Aim of this article is to analyse the borderline separating child's language and adolescent's language, as well as to determine the differences in features of both language varieties.Materials and methods The article contains materials on researches of child's and adolescent's language in Latvia and Germany, as well as the results acquired during project "Language individualities of age groups in Latvia: linguistic, social and cultural aspect" of 2008 State research programme "Latvian Studies: research on history, language and culture" carried out in research centre of child's language at the Riga Teacher Training and Educational Management Academy.Results The term ‘adolescents’ has failed to have a uniform definition up to now. This term includes biological and social aspect, which are understood differently in different eras and cultures: adolescence in the cycle of each individual begins with puberty and ends when the individual has found his personal and social identity proven by economic and social independence.In psychology, sociology and linguistics, various opinions rule about the age borderline dividing a child from an adolescent. This causes additional difficulties when analysing the influence of age on language use. Research show that various periods of adolescents' physical and psychic development affect usage changes in language means of expressions at the definite age, for example, it has been concluded that an adolescent's age influences his speech: the older is the adolescent the more his speech resembles adult speech. Such comparison would be necessary to carry out research an child's speech.Conclusions Comparison of features of child's and adolescent's language (use of non-literary vocabulary and vulgarism, making of neologisms, and using vocabulary incomprehensible to adults) lead to be conclusion that the most significant differences of both language varieties are to be found in functions of neologism formation and usage, intentional formation of vocabulary which is incomprehensible to adults and the adults' attitude towards use of one and the same vocabulary in child's and adolescent's speech. Further research should find out what extra-linguistic circumstances facilitate arising of these differences, for example, how school children feel in the society and how these feelings are reflected in speech.

Keywords

EN

child's language; adolescent's language; age period border; language use

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Ad verba liberorum
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 104-109

Dates

published

2009-05-01

online

2012-08-21

Contributors

author

Laura Tidriķe

• Child's Language Research Centre of RTTEMA, Latvia University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia

References

• Androutsopoulos, J. (2001). Von fett zu fabelhaft': Jugendsprache in der Sprachbiografie. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie (62), S. 55-78.
• Baacke, D. (1991). Die 13-18jährigen: Einführung in die Probleme des Jugendalters. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz, S. 368.
• Bernart, Y. (1998). Jugend. In: Handwörterbuch zur Gesellschaft Deutschlands (S. 352-361). Hrsg. B. Schäfers, W. Zapf. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.
• Cherubim, D. (1986). Jugendsprache und Soziolinguistik. In: Neue Entwicklungen der angewandten Linguistik (S. 87-89). Hrsg. W. Kühlwein. Tübingen: Günter Narr.
• Ernstsone, V., Tidriķe, L. (2006). Jauniešu valoda [Language of the Youth]. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 193 lpp. (in Latvian).
• Fend, H. (2000). Entwicklungspsychologie des Jugendalters. Ein Lehrbuch für pädagogische und psychologische Berufe. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, S. 523.
• Ferchhoff, W. (1999). Jugend an der Wende vom 20. zum 21. Jahrhundert. Lebensformen und Lebensstile. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, S. 333.
• Ferchhoff, W., Neubauer, G. (1997). Patchwork - Jugend. Eine Einführung in postmoderne Sichtweisen. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, S. 197.
• Gaigala, A. (2007). Vai un kāpēc jauniešiem cita valoda [Do Young People Speak Another Language and Why?]. Retrieved November 9, 2008, from
• Hurrelmann, K. (1998). Einführung in die Sozialisationstheorie. Über den Zusammenhang von Sozialisationsstruktur und Persönlichkeit. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz, S. 301.
• Kasten, H. (1999). Pubertät und Adoleszenz: wie Kinder heute erwachsen werden. München, Basel: Ernst Reinhardt, S. 224.
• Markus, D. (2003). Bērna valoda: no pirmā kliedziena līdz pasakai [A Child's Language: From the First Cry to the Fairy-Tale]. Rīga: Rasa ABC, 143 lpp. (in Latvian).
• Markus, D. (2008). Latviešu bērnu valodas pētījumi: problēmas un risinājumi [Studies of the Language Spoken by Latvian Children: Problems and Solutions]. In: Letonikas otrais kongress. Valodniecības raksti - 2 (136.-145. lpp.). Rīga: LZA (in Latvian).
• Neuland, E. (2004). Jugendsprache und Standardsprache - Sprachgebrauch Jugendlicher in Deutschland. (Ergebnisse des DFG-Forschungsprojektes). Frankfurt/M., Berlin, Bern: Peter Lang.
• Pedagogijas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca [Explanatory Dictionary of Pedagogical Terms]. Rīga: Zvaigzne, 248 lpp.(in Latvian).
• Remschmidt, H. (1992). Adoleszenz. Entwicklung und Entwicklungskrisen im Jugendalter. Stuttgart, New York: Georg Thieme, S. 310.
• Schäfers, B. (2001). Jugendsoziologie. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, S. 214.
• Svence, G. (1999). Attīstības psihologija [Developmental Psychology]. Rīga: Zvaigzne, 159 lpp. (in Latvian).
• Zimmermann, P. (2000). Grundwissen Sozialisation. Opladen: Leske+Budrich, S. 144.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10196-011-0013-2