2011 | 3 | 1 | 33-46
Article title

Reference Model of Project Prototyping Problem

Title variants
Languages of publication
The paper presents the idea of reference model of project prototyping problem for the projects that are at risk of failure. The hierarchical structure of declarative model connects two fields: functionalities of a typical service enterprise and management system of project execution in the enterprise. The functionalities as separate Constraints Satisfaction Problems (CSP) are described. CSP contains the sets of decision variables, their domains and constraints, which link these variables. The separated problems described as CSP, then in single main CSP are integrated. On the other hand, these problems can decompose into the subproblems concerning the functionalities of different fields. The open structure of model enables to solve the decision problems with different level of specificity. The decision problem can regard a query about the results of proposed decisions as well as the decisions guaranteeing the expected results. A declarative kind of proposed reference model in a natural way allows to implement its in constraint programming languages. The possibility of this approach illustrates an example.
Physical description
  • Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra, Poland
  • Faculty of Management, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
  • Banaszak Z., Bocewicz G., Bach I. - CP-driven production process planning in multiproject environment [in] Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services, Vol. 2, No.1-2, 2008, pp. 5-32.
  • Belassi W., Tukel O. I. - A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects [in] International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 14, 1996, pp. 141-151.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Bertalanffy L. - General system theory - A Critical Review [in] General Systems, pp. 1-20, Vol. 7, 1962.
  • Bocewicz G., Bach-Dąbrowska I., Banaszak Z. - Declarative approach to computer aided project planning systems design. Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT, Warszawa 2009.
  • Bubnicki Z. - Logic-algebraic method for knowledge-based relation systems [in] Systems Analysis Modelling and Simulation, Vol. 33, 1998, pp. 21-35.
  • Cooke-Davies T. J., Arzymanow A. - The maturity of project management in different industries: an investigation into variations between project management models [in] International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 21, 2003, pp. 471-478.
  • Jorgensen M., Sjoberg D. I. - The impact of customer expectation on software development effort estimates [in] International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, 2004, pp. 317-325.[Crossref]
  • Jorgensen M., Gruschke T. - The impact of lessonslearned sessions on effort estimation and uncertainty assessments [in] IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2009, pp. 368-383.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Kerzner H. - Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Tenth Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York 2009.
  • Koenig D. - Project Rescuing [in] PM Network, No. 1, 2006, pp. 64-68.
  • Meredith J. R., Mantel S. J. - Project Management - a managerial approach. Third Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1995.
  • Molokken-Ostvold K., Jorgensen M. - A comparison of software project overruns [in] IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 9, 2005, pp. 754-766.[Crossref]
  • Nitithamyong P., Skibniewski M. J. - Success/failure factors and performance measures of web-based construction project management systems: professionals' viewpoint [in] Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 132, 2006, pp. 80-87.
  • Project Management Institute - A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Fourth Edition, Paperback PMI, PMBOK Books, Newton Squeare 2008.
  • Rakitin S. - Creating accurate estimates and realistic schedules [in] SQP, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2002, pp. 30-36.
  • Reichelt K., Lyneis J. - The dynamics of project performance: benchmarking the drivers of cost and schedule overrun [in] European Management Journal, Vol. 17, 1999, pp. 135-150.[Crossref]
  • Robertson S., Williams T. - Understanding project failure: using cognitive mapping in an insurance project [in] Project Management Journal, Vol. 37, 2006, pp. 55-71.
  • Rossi F. - Constraint (logic) programming: A survey on research and applications [in] New Trends in Constraints (Apt K. R. et al.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2000, pp. 40-74.
  • Schutle H., Smolka G., Wurtz J. - Finite Domain Constraint Programming in Oz. German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence, Saarbrücken 1998.
  • Shore B. - Systematic biases and culture in project failures [in] Project Management Journal, Vol. 39, 2008, pp. 5-16.[Crossref][WoS]
  • Singh R., Keil M., Kasi V. - Identifying and overcoming the challenges of implementing a project management office [in] European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 18, 2009, pp. 409-427.[WoS][Crossref]
  • Van Roy P., Haridi S. - Concepts, techniques and models of computer programming. Helion, Gliwice 2005.
  • Yeo K. T. - Critical failure factors in information system projects [in] International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20, 2002, pp. 241-246.[Crossref]
  • Yourdon E. - Death march: The complete software developer's guide to surviving ‘mission impossible’ projects. Englewood Cliffs. Prentice-Hall, New York 1997.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.