2012 | 16 | 2 | 217-230
Article title

Stakeholders management in public hospitals in the context of resources

Title variants
Languages of publication
Stakeholders management in public hospitals - from stakeholders management to stakeholders relations Public sector organisations have a sufficient influence to win political legitimization and resources to finance their operations by satisfying their stakeholders. Organizations that adopt stakeholder management principles probably better satisfy their constituent needs and balance their interests, which results in higher capacity of goal achievement. The question of what initiatives were undertaken by public sector organisations to manage different stakeholders, and what were their motivations is still unanswered. The aim of this paper is to understand how stakeholder groups are being recognized in the public hospitals’ decision-making in context of resources.
Zarządzanie interesariuszami w szpitalach publicznych - od zarządzania do relacji z interesariuszami Organizacje sektora publicznego podejmują działania w celu zapewnienia legitymizacji dla swoich działań i pozyskania zasobów potrzebnych do finansowania ich działalności. W tym celu zaspokajają oczekiwania kluczowych interesariuszy. Organizacje, które zarządzają relacjami z interesariuszami mają większą szansę na osiąganie swoich celów. Natomiast nie jest jasne jakie dokładnie działania są podejmowane przez organizacje sektora publicznego w celu zarządzania relacjami z interesariuszami i jakie są ich motywacje. Celem artykułu jest zaprezentowanie w jaki sposób podejmowane są decyzje związane z interesariuszami w odniesieniu do zasobów.
Physical description
  • University of Economics in Katowice
  • 1. Agle B.R., Mitchell R.K., Sonnenfeld J.A. (1999), Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values, “Academy of Management Journal”, nr 42.
  • 2. Banks M., Vera D. (2007), Towards a typology of stakeholder management strategies, “Academy of Management Conference”, Philadelphia, PA.
  • 3. Barringer B.R., Harrison J.S. (2000), Walking a tightrope: creating value through interorganizational relationships, “Journal of Management”, nr 26.
  • 4. Blair J.D., Whitehead C.J. (1988), Too many on the seesaw: Stakeholder diagnosis and management for hospitals, “Hospital & Health Services Administration”, Vol. 02, nr 33 (2).
  • 5. Bryson J.M. (2004), What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identifi cation and analysis techniques, “Public Management Review”, nr 6 (1).
  • 6. Donaldson T., Preston L.E. (1995), The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications, “Academy of Management Review”, nr 20.
  • 7. Eesley C, Lenox M.J. (2006), Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action, “Strategic Management Journal”, nr 27.
  • 8. Ferlie E., Hartley J., Martin C. (2003), Changing public service organizations: current perspectives and future prospect, “British Journal of Management” Special Issue, Vol. 14.
  • 9. Freeman J.H. (1982), Organizational life cycles and natural selection processes, [w:] Staw B.M., Cummings L.L., Research in organizational behavior , JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn.
  • 10. Freeman R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach, Pitman, Boston.
  • 11. Harrison J.S., St. John C.H. (1997), StrategicManagement of Organizations and Stakeholders: Concepts and Cases (2nd edn), Thomson South-western, Cincinnati, OH.
  • 12. Hillman A.J., Keim G.D., Luce R.A. (2001), Board Composition and Stakeholder Performance: Do Stakeholder Directors Make a Difference?, “Business and Society”, nr 40.
  • 13. Hosseini J.C., Brenner S.N. (1992), A Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: A Methodology to Generate Value Matrix Weights, “Business Ethics Quarterly: nr 2.
  • 14. Jones T.M. (1995), Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics, “Academy of Management Review”, nr 20.
  • 15. Kumar K., Subramanian R. (1996), Meeting the Expectations of Key Stakeholders: Stakeholder Management in the Health Care Industry, “Sam Advanced Management Journal”, nr 65 (2).
  • 16. Lee S.D., Alexander J.A. (1999), Managing hospitalsin turbulent times: Do organisational changes improve hospital survival, “Health Service Research”, nr 34 (4).
  • 17. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.D. (1997), Toward a theory of stakeholder identifi cation and salience: defi ning the principle of who or what really counts, “Academy of Management Review”, nr 24 (2).
  • 18. Pfeffer J., Salancik G.R. (1978/2003), The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York.
  • 19. Phillips R.A. (2003), Stakeholder Legitimacy, “Business Ethics Quarterly”, nr 13 (1).
  • 20. Rainey H. (1997), Understanding and managing public organization, Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  • 21. Rowley T.J. (1997), Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder infl uences, Academy of Management Review”, nr 22.
  • 22. Scott D.J., Ofori-Dankwa J.C., Justis R.T. (2008), Understanding strategic responses to interest group pressures, “Strategic Management Journal”, nr 29.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.