“Neatly Severing The Body From The Head:” Female Abjection In Margaret Atwood’S The Edible Woman

• Authors: Ulla Kriebernegg
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In Margaret Atwood’s fiction and poetry, wounded female bodies are a frequently used metaphor for the central characters’ severe identity crises. Atwood’s female protagonists or lyric personae fight marginalization and victimization and often struggle to position themselves in patriarchal society. In order to maintain the illusion of a stable identity, the characters often disavow parts of themselves and surrender to a subversive memory that plays all sorts of tricks on them. However, these “abject” aspects (J. Kristeva, Powers of Horror) cannot be repressed and keep returning, threatening the women’s only seemingly unified selves: In Surfacing, for example, the protagonist suffers from emotional numbness after an abortion. In The Edible Woman, the protagonist’s crisis results in severe eating disorders and in Cat’s Eye and The Robber Bride the central characters’ conflicts are externalized and projected onto haunting ghost-like trickster figures. In this paper, I will look at various representations of “wounded bodies and wounded minds” in samples of Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman, focusing on the intersection of memory and identity and analyzing the strategies for healing that Margaret Atwood offers.

Keywords

EN

Canadian literature; female identity; abjection; healing strategies; symbolic cannibalism

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Linguaculture
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 2012
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 53-64

Dates

published

2012-12-01

online

2013-02-12

Contributors

author

Ulla Kriebernegg

• University of Graz, Austria

References

• Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 2003. Print.
• ----------. Surfacing. New York NY: Popular Library, 1972. Print.
• ----------. Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature. Toronto: Anansi, 1972. Print.
• ----------. The Edible Woman. 1st ed. London: Virago, 1994. Print.
• ----------. The Journals of Susanna Moodie. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1970. Print.
• ----------. The Robber Bride. London: Bloomsbury, 1993. Print.
• ----------. The Year Of The Flood. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 2009. Print.
• Bauman, Zygmunt, and Benedetto Vecchi. Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Reprint. Themes for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Polity, 2006. Print.
• Davidson, Arnold E. and Cathy N. Davidson (eds.). The Art of Margaret Atwood. Essays inCriticism. Toronto: Anansi, 1981. Print.
• Friedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique. New York: Norton, 1974. Print.
• Gross, Elisabeth. “The Body of Signification”. Abjection, Melancholia, and Love: The Workof Julia Kristeva. Ed. John Fletcher, and Andrew E. Benjamin. Warwick Studies in Philosophy and Literature. London, New York: Routledge, 1990. 80-103. Print.
• Hall, Stuart. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Culture, media and identities. London: Sage Publ. [u.a.], 2003. Print.
• Howells, Coral Ann. Margaret Atwood. Macmillan Modern Novelists. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999. Print.
• Ingersoll, Earl (ed.). Waltzing Again. New and Selected Conversations with MargaretAtwood. Princeton, NJ: Ontario Review Press, 2006. Print.
• Keith, William. Introducing Margaret Atwood’s The Edible Woman. A Reader’s Guide. Toronto: ECW Press, 1989. Print.
• Kolodny, Annette. “Some Notes on Defining a ‘Feminist Literary Criticism’”. Criticis. Essays on Theory, Poetry and Prose. Ed. Cheryl L. Brown and Karen Olson. Metuchen: London, 1978. Print.
• Kristeva, Julia. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Transl. by Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1982. Print.
• ----------. Revolution in Poetic Language. Ed. Waller, Margaret, and Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1984. Print.
• McLay, Catherine. "The Edible Woman as a Romance". The Art of Margaret Atwood:Essays in Criticism. Ed. Arnold E. Davidson, Cathy Notari Davidson, and Margaret Atwood. Toronto: Anansi, 1981. 123-138. Print.
• Nischik, Reingard. Engendering Genre. The Works of Margaret Atwood. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2009. Print.
• Özdemir, Erinc. “Power, Madness, and Gender Identity in Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing: A Feminist Reading”. English Studies. 84.1 (Feb. 2003): 57-79. Web. 25. Sep. 2008. <http://han.uni-graz.at/han/EBSCOPlattform/ content.ebscohost.com/pdf13_15/pdf/2003/ENS/01Feb03/9765200.pdf?T =P&P=AN&K=9765200&S=R&D=aph&EbscoContent=dGJyMNLe80SeqLM40d vuOLCmrlCeprJSs6q4S7aWxWXS&ContentCustomer=dGJyMPGot0i0ra9LuePfg eyx44Dt6fIA>.
• Parker, Emma. “From House to Home: A Kristevan Reading of Michele Roberts’s Daughters of the House”. Critique. 41.2.Winter (2000): 153-173. Web. 25. Sept. 2008. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=afh&AN=2622132&site= ehost-live>.
• Rao, Eleonora. Strategies for Identity: The Fiction of Margaret Atwood. Writing About Women 9. New York, NY: Lang, 1993. Print.
• Sandler, Linda. “Interview with Margaret Atwood.” The Malahat Review 41.1 (1997). 7 - 27. Reprinted in Earl G. Ingersoll. Waltzing Again. New and Selected Conversationswith Margaret Atwood. Princeton, NJ: Ontario Review Press, 2006. 18 - 36. Print.
• Tolan, Fiona. Margaret Atwood: Feminism and Fiction. Costerus N.S., 170. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10318-012-0020-8