Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2012 | 9 | 1 | 12-21

Article title

I’m Lovin’ it

Authors

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The paper presents the special meanings and many-sided implications that can be conjectured from the use of a stative verb in the progressive, and the linguistic difficulties encountered in analysing McDonald’s slogan. It reviews the behaviour of to love when tested for stativeness and concludes that as a “progressive stative” verb it can be cleverly exploited for fresh emotional implications.

Publisher

Year

Volume

9

Issue

1

Pages

12-21

Physical description

Dates

published
2012-12-01
online
2013-02-21

Contributors

author
  • “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University of Iaşi

References

  • Aristotle. 1970. Physics. W. Charlton (trans., introd. and notes). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Aristotle. 1976. The Ethics of Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. J.A.K. Thomson (trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Binnick, R. I. 1991. Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Celce-Murcia, M. and D. Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  • Comrie B. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.[WoS]
  • Downing, A. and P. Locke. 2006. English Grammar: A University Course (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Dowty, D. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Gruber S. J. 1976. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Huddleston R. and G. K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Kesner Bland, S. 1988. ‘The Present Progressive in Discourse: Grammar versus Usage Revisited’ in TESOLQuarterly. 22/1, pp. 54-68.
  • Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Miller, G.A. and P.N. Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1981) ‘Events, Processes, and States’ in Syntax and Semantics 14, (P. Tedesch and J. Kimball eds.). New York: Academic Press, pp. 191-212.
  • Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech. and J. Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
  • Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. Available: http://www.mcdonalds.ca/ [2011, January 5].

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.doi-10_2478_v10319-012-0002-2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.