PL EN


2009 | 64 | 2 | 107-113
Article title

THE ANALYTIC-CONTINENTAL DEBATE (Spor medzi analytickou a kontinentalnou filozofiou)

Title variants
Languages of publication
SK
Abstracts
EN
In 2007, a debate took place between Hungarian representatives of the analytic and continental schools of philosophy. (1) Boldizsar Eszes and Janos Tozser concluded their article about the history of analytic philosophy by the claim that the only possible method of philosophising is analytic. (2) Answering on behalf of continental philosophers, Tibor Schwendtner approached the topic from the points of view of the sociology of knowledge and academic politics. (3) Tamas Ullmann also defended continental philosophy, emphasizing that it is not vague or unscientific. (4) Istvan Farago-Szabo, in opposition to the continental position, represented a third, independent point of view. (5) In their answer to Schwendtner, Eszes and Tozser reject his charges, providing extensive evidence against them.
Year
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
107-113
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
  • Istvan Farago-Szabo, ELTE-BTK, Filozofia Intezet,1088 Budapest, Puskin u. 3. (a Trefort kerti kampusz I epulete), postacim: 1364 Budapest, Pf. 107, Hungary
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
09SKAAAA058714
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.e13a488c-0bd6-3149-a3a5-3b29d145b561
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.