SPOR MEDZI ANALYTICKOU A KONTINENTÁLNOU FILOZOFIOU

• Authors: Farago-Szabó István

Title variants

EN

Analytic-cntinental debate

• Languages of publication: SK

Abstracts

EN

In 2007, a debate took place between Hungarian representatives of the analytic and continental schools of philosophy. (1) Boldizsar Eszes and Janos Tozser concluded their article about the history of analytic philosophy by the claim that the only possible method of philosophising is analytic. (2) Answering on behalf of continental philosophers, Tibor Schwendtner approached the topic from the points of view of the sociology of knowledge and academic politics. (3) Tamas Ullmann also defended continental philosophy, emphasizing that it is not vague or unscientific. (4) Istvan Farago-Szabo, in opposition to the continental position, represented a third, independent point of view. (5) In their answer to Schwendtner, Eszes and Tozser reject his charges, providing extensive evidence against them.

Keywords

EN

ANALYTIC-CONTINENTAL DEBATE; ARGUMENTATIVE POWER OF PHILOSOPHY; HUNGARIAN REPRESENTATIVES OF PHILOSOPHY; PHILOSOPHY AND REAL LIFE

Discipline

• PHILOSOPHY: PHILOSOPHY

• Publisher: Institute of Philosophy, Slovak Academy of Sciences
• Journal: Filozofia (Philosophy)
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 64
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 107-113
• Document type: ARTICLE

Contributors

author

Farago-Szabó István

• Istvan Farago-Szabo, ELTE-BTK, Filozofia Intezet,1088 Budapest, Puskin u. 3. (a Trefort kerti kampusz I epulete), postacim: 1364 Budapest, Pf. 107, Hungary

Identifiers

CEJSH db identifier

09SKAAAA058714