PL EN


2006 | 97 | 4 | 5-15
Article title

MEDITATION

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The article is a personal reflection on diary writing. The author initially confesses that he never wrote a diary and was not sure if he should do that, as diary writing accompanies 'an indispensable doubt in what we write in it'. Thus, he finds only a literary justification for any diary and lists its four possible motives: poetical (revealing the author's handwriting), historical (discerning the traces of an epoch), utopian (knowing the intimacy of the writer), love (polishing the accuracy of expressing). The question asked by him if he should keep a diary is connected with a more important question: can one make a diary a work? Consequently, he quotes two samples of his diary to return at the end to the problem of literary status of a diary. For the author, the status in question is ambivalent: due to its austerity, a diary has an unstable form, so it is not a text, but simultaneously it is a form in the making, it is a germ, a scrap of a text. As he sees it, one cannot overcome the ambivalence since it would result only in 'overworking' the diary to its death, but then it would stop being a diary.
Keywords
Year
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
5-15
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
author
  • R. Barthes, Paris, no address given, contact the journal editor
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
06PLAAAA01833915
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ed689aa1-7a22-3d20-abce-7d88e2985577
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.