PL EN


2008 | 17 | 1(65) | 41-52
Article title

What We Have Learned from the Discussion on Justification of Knowledge

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
This is an attempt to investigate two opposite positions in the controversy about justification of knowledge - foundationalism and coherentism. The author refers to the views of Edmund Gettier, Ernst Sosa and Keith Lehrer. The main findings can be summarized as follows. The author argues that the two opposite positions are not dramatically contrary. Moreover, taking a clue from Sosa, he distinguishes an ideal of knowledge based on formal criteria from substantive knowledge that bears the stamp of revocable theory. Finally, going in the footsteps of Lehrer, he identifies genuine knowledge with a search for truth and indicates that a new form of justification of knowledge is to be looked-for in the hope that the new approach will redefine such concepts as relativism, skepticism and epistemological realism.
Year
Volume
17
Issue
Pages
41-52
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
  • M. Chojnacki, for postal address contact the journal editor
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
08PLAAAA054015
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.f19ed30b-3a85-35d4-a95d-6aaaec772110
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.