PL EN


2004 | 13 | 3(51) | 177-194
Article title

Revolution, Demarcation, and Psychology

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
Is psychology like another empirical discipline, say physics or biology, or is it fundamentally different? The principal aim of the article is to demonstrate that the last two revolutions in psychology were made for the sake of science. Chomsky, Fodor, Pylyshyn battled against the behaviorist point of view. Lakoff, Johnson, Langacker fought against syntactocentrism of Chomsky's generative grammar. From Chomsky's point of view Skinner's behaviorist theory is not science, but from the perspective of Langacker's cognitive grammar Chomsky's theory of competence is not science either. That is the reason why the questions: what is science?, who is a scientist?, and how is the world 'science' to be used?- are so important. Such reconstruction of the scientific practice is to some extence consonant with Kuhn's analysis of the history of science.
Year
Volume
13
Issue
Pages
177-194
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
author
  • S. Wróbel, Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN, ul. Nowy Swiat 72, 00-330 Warszawa, Poland
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
04PLAAAA0013335
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.fbf258de-f4a6-3906-98e2-3cf8eb060d5c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.