PL EN


2008 | 17 | 4(68) | 303-318
Article title

Why the Modal Logician Need Not Worry About the Slingshot Argument Any More

Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The authors address various versions of the so-called slingshot argument, which Quine uses in his various attacks on modal logic. They sketch out various formulations of the argument and explain different interpretations of them. Then they show that none of the interpretations is logically sound - each of them tacitly assumes some premise regarding identity or equivalence that is unacceptable. Subsequently they provide some insights into the motivations that might have led Quine to present repeatedly a fallacious argument, and they surmise that the rejection of the slingshot arguments would require a revision of Quinean holism.
Year
Volume
17
Issue
Pages
303-318
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
author
author
  • T. Ciecierski, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Instytut Filozofii, ul. Krakowskie Przedmiescie 3, 00-047 Warszawa, Poland
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
09PLAAAA064117
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.fd3a06a4-9c19-3a51-ae68-22a26dcdff17
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.