PL EN


2007 | 43 | 2(172) | 287-292
Article title

Polemics with Lucio Russo

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
EN
The author evaluates Russo's ideas from postmodernist position. Contrary to L. Russo, who emphasizes the continuity and the commensurability in the history of science, he suggests that one should stress also discontinuity and incommensurability. Russo loses what is new and different in relation to Hellenistic science. He interprets the history of science as a repetition of the same Hellenistic paradigm. In his work, there is no emergence of novelty. From the other side, criticizing his exaggeratedly formalistic point of view, the author refers to the arguments of Heyting, Brouwer and I. Lakatos.
Year
Volume
43
Issue
Pages
287-292
Physical description
Document type
ARTICLE
Contributors
author
  • K. Kosciuszko, Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski, Instytut Filozofii, ul. Oczapowskiego 4, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
CEJSH db identifier
07PLAAAA03196609
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.ff8bea73-7dae-32c4-a238-87bf1eafaa02
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.