Catching Up And Falling Behind: Four Puzzles After Two Decades Of Post-Communist Transformation / Doganianie Czy Pozostawanie w Tyle: Cztery Zagadki Po Dwóch Dekadach Transformacji Postkomunistycznej

• Authors: Zenonas Norkus
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

After more than two decades since the exit from Communism, no former communist country has been completely successful in catching up with the technological frontier countries. However, they divide into two groups: those which decreased the GDP gap with frontier countries since 1989-1990, and those which failed to do so. One may ask: What were the decisive causal conditions for their progress or failure in convergence? Were they the early implementation of Washington consensus style market reforms; their neighbourhood with advanced affluent countries; peaceful transition; accession to the EU; endowment with natural resources; state sovereignty before postcommunism; or interactions between these factors (or others)? Because of the small N, statistical analysis is not an appropriate tool for testing these hypotheses. Hence this paper uses qualitative comparative analysis to identify four explanatory puzzles of the catching-up growth performance of the postcommunist countries.

PL

Po ponad dwudziestu latach od upadku komunizmu, żaden z byłych krajów bloku komunistycznego nie był w stanie całkowicie dogonić krajów technologiczne przodujących. Jednak, kraje postkomunistyczne można podzielić na dwie grupy: te, którym udało się zmniejszyć lukę w produkcie krajowym brutto (PKB) w stosunku do krajów technologiczne przodujących, i te, którym nie udało się tego zrobić. Nasuwa się zatem pytanie, jakie uwarunkowania zadecydowały o powodzeniu lub niepowodzeniu konwergencji? Czy to było wczesne wdrożenie reform rynkowych w stylu Konsensusu waszyngtońskiego; Sąsiedztwo zaawansowanych gospodarczo krajów zamożnych; spokojny, pokojowy przebieg transformacji systemowej; przystąpienie do Unii Europejskiej, zasobność kraju w zasoby naturalne, skala suwerenności państwa przed transformacją lub interakcje między tymi czynnikami (lub inne czynniki)? Ze względu na małą liczebność próby (N), analiza statystyczna nie jest odpowiednim narzędziem do testowania tych hipotez. Dlatego w artykule zastosowano jakościową analizę porównawczą identyfikując cztery zagadki w wyjaśnianiu przyczyn powodzenia lub klęski wzrostu doganiającego w krajach postkomunistycznych.

Keywords

EN

post-communism; catching up growth; qualitative comparative analysis; market reforms; location; EU membership; war; natural resources; statehood

PL

postkomunizm; wzrost doganiający; jakościowa analiza porównawcza; reformy rynkowe; lokalizacja; członkostwo w UE; wojny; zasoby naturalne; państwowość

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 18
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 63-79

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2015-12-17

Contributors

author

Zenonas Norkus

• Vilnius University, Lithuania., Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Sociology

References

• Adalian R. P. (2010), Historical Dictionary of Armenia. 2nd ed., Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Md.
• Balcerowicz L. (1995), Socialism68, Capitalism, Transformation, Central European University Press, Budapest.
• Balmaceda M. (2013), The Politics of Energy Dependency: Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania Between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian Pressure, 1992-2012, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
• Berg-Schlosser D. (2012), Mixed Methods in Comparative Politics: Principles and Applications, Palgrave, Houndmills.
• Campos N., Coricelli F., Moretti L. (2013), Economic Growth and European Integration: a Counterfactual Analysis. < http://extranet.isnie.org/uploads/isnie2013/campos_coricelli_moretti.pdf >. 20.07.2015.
• Caramani D. (2009), Introduction to the Comparative Method with Boolean Algebra, Sage, Los Angeles.
• Colgan J. D. (2013), Petro-Aggression: When Oil Causes War, Cambridge UP, New York.
• Cox J. (2005), Slovenia. Evolving Loyalties, Routledge, London.
• Cronqvist L. (2007), Konfigurationelle Analyse mit Multi-Value QCA als Methode der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschafts mit einem Fallbeispiel aus der Vergleichenden Parteienforschung (Erfolg Grüner Parteien in den achtziger Jahren). <http://archiv.ub.uni-marburg.de/diss/z2007/0620/pdf/cronqvist.pdf.> . 20.07.2015.
• Cronqvist L. (2011), Tosmana: Tool for Small-N Analysis [Computer Programme], Version 1.3.2.0. University of Trier, Trier. <http://www.compasss.org/files/tosmana_1312.zip >. 20.07.2015.
• Eurostat (2014), GDP per capita in PPS. <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tec00114&plu gin=1> 20.07.2015.
• Karmazinaitė S., Maniokas K., Žeruolis D. (2014), Lietuvos dešimtmetis Europos Sąjungoje: dideli lūkesčiai, maži pokyčiai? [Ten Years of Lithuania in the EU: High Expectations, Low Transformation?]‚ ‘Politologija‘, Vilnius University Press, Nr. 4 (76), pp. 40-91. <http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/politologija/article/view/4875/3131> 20.07.2015
• King L. P. (2001), The Basic Features of Post-Communist Capitalism: Firms in Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, Praeger Press, Westport, Conn.
• Kuzio T. (2001), Transition in Post-Communist States: Triple or Quadruple?, ‘Politics‘, Wiley, Vol. 21, Nr. 1, pp. 168-177.
• Laar M. (2002). Estonia: Little Country that Could, Centre for Research into Post- Communist Economies, London.
• Lankina T. V., Getachew L. (2006), A Geographic Incremental Theory of Democratization: Territory, Aid, and Democracy in Postcommunist Regions, ‘World Politics‘, Cambridge UP, Vol. 58, Nr. 4, pp. 536-582.[Crossref]
• Lauristin M., Vihalemm P. (2009), The Political Agenda During Different Periods of Estonian Transformation: External and Internal Factors, ‘Journal of Baltic Studies‘, Routledge, Vol. 40, Nr.1, pp.1-28.[WoS][Crossref]
• Lauristin M., Norkus Z., Vihalemm P. (2011), On Sociology’s Contribution to Knowledge of the Baltic Way, ‘Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas‘, Vilnius University Press, Nr. 2 (29), pp. 128-155. <http://www.journals.vu.lt/sociologija-mintis-ir-veiksmas/article/download/6129/5037>. 20.07.2015
• Luong P. J., Weinthal E. (2006), Rethinking the Natural Resource Curse: Ownership Structure, Institutional Capacity, and Domestic Constraints, ‘Annual Review of Political Science‘, Annual Reviews, Vol. 9, pp. 241-263.[Crossref][WoS]
• Norkus Z. (2012), On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Patterns in Post-Communist Transformation, Apostrofa, Vilnius.
• Norkus Z., Morkevičius V. 2011. Kokybinė lyginamoji analizė. Vadovėlis aukštųjų mokyklų studentams [Qualitative Comparative Analysis. A Textbook for Higher School Students], Lietuvos HSM duomenu archyvas (LiDA), Kaunas.
• Offe C. (1991), Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe, ‘Social Research‘, John Hopkins UP, Vol. 58, Nr. 4, pp. 865-892.
• Ploeg van der F., Venables A. J. (2012), Natural Resource Wealth: The Challenge of Managing a Windfall, ‘Annual Review of Economics‘, Annual Reviews, vol. 4: pp. 315-337.
• Ragin Ch. C. (1987), The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, University of California Press, Berkeley. Ragin Ch. C. (2000), Fuzzy-set Social Science, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
• Ragin Ch. C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Rihoux B., Ragin Ch. eds. (2009), Confgurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
• Ross M., Homer E. (1976), Galton’s Problem in Cross-National Research, ‘World Politics‘, Cambridge UP, Vol. 29, Nr. 1, pp. 1-28.[Crossref]
• Ross M. (2015), What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse?, ‘Annual Review of Political Science‘, vol. 18: pp. 239-259.[WoS]
• Schaefer, J. M., ed. (1974), Studies in Cultural Diffusion: Galton‘s Problem. New Haven: HRAF.
• Schneider C. Q., Wagemann C. (2012), Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
• Schweizer Th. (1987), Methodological Problems of Cross-Cultural Comparison, HRAF Press, New Haven.
• Stark D., Bruszt L. (1998), Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Thiem A., Duşa A. (2013), Qualitative Comparative Analysis with R: A User's Guide, Springer, New York.
• Walder A. ed. (1995), The Waning of the Communist State: Economic Origins of Political Decline in China and Hungary, University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Wallerstein I. (2000), The Essential Wallerstein, The New York Press, New York.
• Wallerstein I. (2004), World-systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press, Durham.
• Wick K., Bulte E. (2009), The Curse of Natural Resources, ‘Annual Review of Resource Economics‘, Annual Reviews, 1: pp. 139-55.
• Wilson A. (2011), Belarus: the Last Dictatorship in Europe. Yale UP, New Haven.
• World Bank (2002), Growth Challenges and Government Policies in Armenia. Washington, D.C. : World Bank. <https://www.wdronline.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/14069/multi0page.pdf?sequence= 1> . 20.07.2015.
• World Bank (2012), World Development Indicators 2012 May Release. < http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators/wdi-2012 >. 20.07.2015.
• World Bank (2014), World Development Indicators 2015. <http://data.worldbank.org/datacatalog/ world-development-indicators> 20.07.2015

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/cer-2015-0029