Exploring the Theories of Radicalization

• Authors: Asta Maskaliūnaitė
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

After the London bombings in July 2005, the concern of terrorism scholars and policy makers has turned to “home-grown” terrorism and potential for political violence from within the states. “Radicalization” became a new buzz word. This article follows a number of reviews of the literature on radicalization and offers another angle for looking at this research. First, it discusses the term “radicalization” and suggests the use of the following definition of radicalization as a process by which a person adopts belief systems which justify the use of violence to effect social change and comes to actively support as well as employ violent means for political purposes. Next, it proposes to see the theories of radicalization focusing on the individual and the two dimensions of his/her motivation: whether that motivation is internal or external and whether it is due to personal choice or either internal (due to some psychological traits) or external compulsion. Though not all theories fall neatly within these categories, they make it possible to make comparisons of contributions from a variety of different areas thus reflecting on the interdisciplinary nature of the study of terrorism in general and radicalization as a part of it.

Keywords

EN

radicalization; theories; terrorism; ideology; grievance; threat

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: International Studies. Interdisciplinary Political and Cultural Journal
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 17
• Pages: 9-26

Dates

published

2015-12-01

online

2015-12-30

Contributors

author

Asta Maskaliūnaitė

• Baltic Defence College,12 Riia St., Tartu, Estonia

References

• Bjørgo, Tore. Strategies for Preventing Terrorism. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013.
• Bongar, Bruce. “The Psychology of Terrorism: Defining the Need and Describing the Goals’, Psychology of Terrorism.” Bongar, Bruce, ed. Psychology of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
• Borum, Randy. Psychology of Terrorism. Tampa: University of South Florida, Web. 2004. <https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/208552.pdf?q=psychology-of-terrorism>.
• Bush, George W. “President Bush’s Speech in Monterrey, Mexico.” PBS Newshour, Web. 22 March 2002 <http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/white_house-jan-june02-bush_03-22/>.
• Carpenter, Joel. Revive Us Again: The Reawakening of American Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
• Crenshaw, Martha. “The Logic of Terrorism: Terrorist Behavior as a Product of Strategic Choice.” Reich, Walter. Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind. Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998.
• Dalgaard-Nielsen, Anja. Studying violent radicalization in Europe. Part I. Potential Contribution of Social Movement Theory. DIIS Working Paper. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2008.
• -----. Studying violent radicalization in Europe. Part II. The potential contribution of socio-psychological and psychological approaches. DIIS Working paper. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies, 2008.
• Della Porta, D. Social movements, political violence and the state: a comparative analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
• English, Richard. Terrorism. How to Respond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
• European Commission Expert Group. Radicalization Processes Leading to Acts of Terrorism. Brussels: European Commission, 2008.
• Ferracuti, F. “Ideology and repentance: Terrorism in Italy.” Reich, W. Origins of Terrorism. Psychologies, Ideologies, Theologies, States of Mind. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998.
• German, Mike. “Debunked NYPD Radicalization Report Just Won’t Die.” Web. 2013 <https://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-religion-belief/debunked-nypd-radicalization-report-just-wont-die.>
• Gurr, Ted. Why Men Rebel. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010 (1970).
• Homeland Security Institute. Radicalization: An Overview and Annotated Biography of Open-Source Literature. Final Report. Arlington: Homeland Security Institute, 2006.
• House of Commons Home Affairs Committee. Roots of Violent Radicalization. London: Stationery Office Limited, 2012.
• Huq, Aziz. “Modelling Terrorist Radicalization.” Duke Forum for Law and Social Change, 2010.
• McCauley, Clark and Sophia Moskalenko. Friction. How Radicalization Happens to Them and Us. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
• -----. “Measuring Political Mobilization: The Distinction Between Activism and Radicalism.” Terrorism and Political Violence, 2009.
• Moghaddam, Fathali. “The Staircase to Terrorism: A Psychology Exploration.” Bongar, Bruce et al. Psychology of Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, (2007): 69-80.
• Muslim American Civil Liberties Coalition. “CountertERRORism policy. MACLC’s Critique of the NYPD’s Report on Homegrown Radicalism,”2008.
• Nasser-Eddine, Minerva et al. Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Literature Review. Edinburgh South Austalia: Counter Terrorism and Security Technology centre, 2011.
• Neumann, Peter. “Introduction.” Neumann, Peter, ed. Perspectives on Radicalization and Political Violence. London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalization and Political Violence, 2008.
• NYPD. Radicalization in the West. The homegrown threat. New York: NYPD Intelligence Division, 2007.
• Pisiou, Daniela. Islamist Radicalisation in Europe. An Occupational change process. London: Routledge, 2012.
• Post, Jerrold. “Terrorist psycho-logic: Terrorist behavior as a product of psychological forces.” Reich, Walter. Origins of terrorism. Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1998.
• Rae, Johnathan. “Will it ever be possible to profile terrorist?” Journal of Terrorism Research (2012).
• Richardson, Louise, ed. The Roots of Terrorism. Madrid: Club de Madrid series on Democracy and Terrorism, 2006.
• Roy, Olivier. Globalized Islam. The Search for a New Ummah. London: C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd, 2001.
• Rubenstein, Richard. Alchemists of revolution. Terrorism in the modern world. New York: Basic Books, 1987.
• Sageman, Marc. Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.
• Schmid, Alex. Radicalisation, De-Radicalisation, Counter-Radicalisation: A Conceptual Discussion and Literature Review. ICCT Research Paper. The Hague: International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, 2013.
• Sedgwick, Mark. “The Concept of Radicalization as a Source of Confusion.” Terrorism and Political Violence (2010): 479-494.
• Silke, A. Research on Terrorism. Trends, Achievements and Failures. London: Frank Cass, 2004.
• -----. “The Devil You Know: Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism.” Terrorism and political violence, 2001.
• Silke, A. “The impact of 9/11 on research on terrorism.” Ranstorp, M. Mapping Terrorism Research. State of the art, gaps and future direction. London: Routledge, 2007.
• Stampnitzky, Lisa. Disciplining terror: How experts invented “Terrorism.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
• Zartman, W. “Need, Creed and Greed in Intrastate Conflict.” Arnson, C. and W. Zartman. Rethinking the Economics of War. The Intersection of Need, Creed, and Greed. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2005.
• Tilly, Charles and Sydney Tarrow. Contentious politics. OUP USA, 2012.
• Trujillo, Humberto, Juan Ramirez and Ferran Alonso. “Indicios de persuasión coercitiva en el adoctrinamiento de terroristas yihadistas: hacia la radicalización violenta.” Universitas Psychologica (2009).
• Wintrobe, Ronald. “Can suicide bombers be rational?” 2001. http://www.diw.de/deutsch/service/veranstaltungen/ws_consequences/docs/diw_ws_consequences200206_wintroepdf. 6 September 2007.
• Volkan, Vamik. “September 11 and Societal Regression.” Group Analysis (2002).

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/ipcj-2015-0002