Leaders And Followers In The Effectiveness Of Public Safety Services In European States – A Spatial Frontier Approach

• Authors: Agata Żółtaszek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Public safety is an important factor in both public and private life. Simultaneously it is one of the most regionally diverse sectors, due to historical, cultural, social, legal, and financial differences.Therefore, it is very difficult to compare public safety policies and facilities directly. However, assessment and comparison are crucial factors for defining the best practices and implementing the “learning-from-the-best” policy, which is important in the process of regional development and globalization. Fortunately some quantitative methods, such as DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) enable this kind of research. DEA allows for analyzing relative effectiveness based on inputs and outputs, without incorporating procedural specifics of public safety. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to perform a regional analysis of the technical effectiveness of public safety systems in European states in 2003 and 2012 by utilizing an optimization method of DEA. Based on the results of this research countries are divided into two groups - effective and ineffective. Countries with effective systems are considered leaders. They present best practices which should be treated as benchmarks for the countries with ineffective systems, i.e. followers. In the research, inputs of the Data Envelopment Analysis consist of human and financial resources, as these are crucial for the functioning of public safety systems. The outputs are transformations of major crime categories. The analysis has been carried out for selected European countries in 2003 and 2012. This analysis indicates that among the countries with effective public safety systems are Finland, Norway, Romania and Poland.The worst technical efficiency could be observed in Belgium, the UK, Estonia, and Italy, which are underperforming and wasting a large proportion of their resources. This research indicates that despite many differences among states’ public safety policies, improvement and regional development can be stimulated and achieved by implementing the “learning-from-the-best” policy.

Keywords

EN

regional analysis; public safety; economics of crime; Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 17
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 253-272

Dates

published

2014-12-01

online

2014-12-30

Contributors

author

Agata Żółtaszek

• Ph.D., University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, Department of Spatial Econometrics

References

• Benson B.L., Zimmerman P.R (ed.) (2010) Handbook on the Economics of Crime, Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Charnes A., Cooper W., Rhodes A. (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, ʻEuropean Journal of Operations Researchʼ.
• Eide E., Rubin P.H., Mehlop Shepherd J. (2006), Economics of Crime, Now Publishers Inc.
• Eurostat Crime and criminal justice (crim) Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS) (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_SDDS/EN/crim_esms.htm) (03.06.2014).
• Compiling agency: Eurostat, the statistical office of the European Union.
• Gospodarowicz, M. (2000), Procedury analizy i oceny banków. [in] Materiały i studia NBP zeszyt nr 103, Narodowy Bank Polski Departament Analiz i Badań, Warszawa, pp. 48-51; Golany B., Roll Y. (1989) Anapplication procedure for DEA. OMEGA Heft Vol. 17, pp. 240-247.
• Galinienė B., Dzemydaitė G. (2012), Spatial Data Envelopment Analysis Method for the Evaluation of Regional Infrastructure Disparities, ʻSocial Technologiesʼ 2012, 2(2), p. 390-403.
• Gospodarowicz A. (2002), Analiza i ocena banków oraz ich oddziałów, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Oskara Langego, Wrocław.
• Kourtit K., Nijkamp P. (2013), In search of creative champions in high-tech spaces: a spatial application of strategic performance management, ʻJournal of regional scienceʼ, vol. 53, no. 5, 2013, pp. 749-777.
• Ortmeier P. J. (1998), Public Safety and Security Administration, Gulf Professional Publishing.
• Seiford L.M., and Zhu J. (2003), Context-dependent Data Envelopment Analysis - Measuring attractiveness and progress, Omega, 31, 2003, pp. 397-408.
• Statystyki ogólne Policji: Postępowania wszczęte, przestępstwa stwierdzone i wykrywalność w latach 1999 - 2013 (2014) (http://statystyka.policja.pl/st/ogolne-statystyki/47682,Postepowaniawszczete- przestepstwa-stwierdzone-i-wykrywalnosc-w-latach-1999-2013.html) (04.05.2014).
• Suzuki S., Nijkamp P. (2011), A Stepwise Projection Data Envelopment Analysis for Public Transport Operations in Japan, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, TI 2011-113/3.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/cer-2014-0044