PL EN


2014 | 01 |
Article title

Ludo-narratywizm, czyli proceduralizm Bogosta na tle sporu ludologii z narratologią

Content
Title variants
PL
Ludo-narrativism as Bogost’s proceduralism in the light of the ludology-narratology debate
Languages of publication
Abstracts
EN
The ludology-narratology dispute has been dismissed and neglected by many researchers. Theorists on both sides of the conflict created theories assimilating the concepts of their opponents. However, in my opinion, Ian Bogost — a scientist not involved in the dispute — has the most interesting solution to the problem. Bogost’s basic concepts — unit operations comparative criticism and procedural rhetoric theory – combine interpretations of game rules with those of narratives. The achievements of Bogost seem less known and appreciated in the Polish game studies. In this article, I will present the basic theories from Bogost’s main books: Unit Operations: An Approach to Videogame Criticism and Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames in the context of ludology versus narratology debate.
Year
Volume
01
Physical description
Dates
published
2014
References
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11089/8848
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.hdl_11089_8848
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.