2007 | 5 | 51-79
Article title

Discrete Entailment-Based Linking and -EENouns in English

Title variants
Languages of publication
Barker (1998) argues that since the referent of an -ee noun can be an indirect object, a direct object, a prepositional object, or a subject, -ee nouns cannot be described as a syntactic natural class. Portero Muñoz (2003) concurs and offers a semantic analysis based on Logical Structure (LS) in the framework of Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). This article proposes that RRG's macroroles (Actor and Undergoer) can be derived with two entailments and without any need for LS. Its analysis improves Portero Muñoz's, presenting additional evidence that subjects that allow -ee noun formation are Undergoers. It also explains why most -ee nouns are direct objects in spite of the fact that the suffix originated as a referent for indirect objects. Finally, it offers an explanation for nouns like amputee, pluckee, twistee, benefactee, malefactee, biographee, catapultee, razee, standee, attendee.
Physical description
  • Wake Forest University
  • Alonso, M. 1962. Evolución sintáctica del español. Sintaxis histórica del español desde el iberorromano hasta nuestros días. Madrid: Aguilar.
  • Alsina, A. 1996. The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar. Evidence from Romance. Stanford: CSLI Lectures Notes ć 62.
  • Barker, C. 1998. "Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation". Language 64, 695-727.[Crossref]
  • Bauer, L. 1987. "-Ee by gum!" American Speech 62, 315-329.[Crossref]
  • Bengtsson, E. 1927. Studies on Passive Nouns with a Concrete Sense. Lund: Hakan Ohlsson.
  • Blake, B. J. 2001. Case. New York: Cambridge UP.
  • Bresnan, J. 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Bresnan, J. (ed.). 1982. "The passive in lexical theory". In: Bresnan J. (ed.), 3-86.
  • Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • Croft, W. 1993. "Case marking and the semantics of mental verbs". In: Pustejovsky J. (ed.), 55-72.
  • Culicover, P. et al. 1977. Formal Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
  • Davis, A. R. 2001. Linking by Types in the Hierarchical Lexicon. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • Delbecque, N. and B. Lamiroy. 1996. "Towards a typology of the Spanish dative". In: W. van Belle and B. Van Langendonck (eds), 71-117.
  • Dowty, D. 1991. "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection". Language 67, 547-619.
  • Draye, L. 1996. "The German dative". In: van Belle W. and W. van Langendonck (eds), 155-215.
  • Dressman, M. R. 1994. "The suffix -ee". In: Little G. D. and M. Montgomery (eds), 155-161.
  • Farrell, P. 1994. Grammatical Relations and Thematic Roles. New York: Garland.
  • Farrell, P. 2001. "Functional shift as category underspecification". English Language and Linguistics 5, 109-130.
  • Fernández Ramírez, S. 1987. Gramática española. El pronombre. Vol. prepared J. Polo. Madrid: Arco/libros, S.A.
  • Foley, W. A. and R. D. van Valin, Jr., 1984. Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
  • García, E. 1975. The Role of Theory in Linguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  • Gili y Gaya, S. 1961. Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Spes S.A.
  • Givón, T. 1997. "Grammatical relations: An introduction". In: Givón T. (ed), 1-84.
  • Givón, T. 1997. Grammatical Relations. A Functionalist Perspective. Typological Studies in Language 35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • González, L. 1998. "Dative/accusative alternations in gustar-type verbs". Spanish Applied Linguistics 2, 137-167.
  • González, L. 2005a. "On the difference between washing machines and waiting lists". Hispania 88, 190-200.[Crossref]
  • González, L. 2005b. "Entailment-based linking theory and some implications for universal language". Journal of Universal Language 6, 29-63.
  • Grimshaw, J. 1982. "On the lexical representation of Romance reflexive clitics". In: Bresnan J. (ed), 87-148.
  • Grimshaw, J. 1990. Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gruber, J. S. 1976. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Heinz, W. and J. Matiasek 1994. "Argument structure and case assignment in German". In: J. Nerbonne et al. (eds), 199-236.
  • Harris, A. 1984. "Inversion as a rule of universal grammar: Georgian evidence". In: Perlmutter D. M. and C. Rosen (eds), 259-291.
  • Horn, L. R. 1980. "Affixation and the unaccusative hypothesis". Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 16, 134-146.
  • Huddleston, R. D. and G. K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Jespersen, O. 1923. Growth and Structure of the English Language. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
  • Jespersen, O. 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. New York: Holt.
  • Kayne, R. 1975. French Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Keyser, S. J. and T. Roeper. 1984. "On the middle and ergative constructions in English". Linguistics Inquiry 15, 381-416.
  • Kishimoto, H. 1996. "Split intransitivity in Japanese and the unaccusative hypothesis". Language 72, 248-286.[Crossref]
  • Kuno, S. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Lamiroy, B. and N. Delbecque. 1998. "The possessive dative in Romance and Germanic languages". In: van Langendonck W. and W. van Belle (eds), 29-74.
  • Lapesa, R. 1983. Historia de la lengua española. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
  • Legendre, G. 1989. "Unaccusativity in French". Lingua 79, 95-164.[Crossref]
  • Levin, B. and M. Rappaport. 1988. "Non-event -er nominals: A probe into argument structure". Linguistics 26, 1067-1083.
  • Levin, B. and M. Rappaport Hovav 1995 [1999]. Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Little, G. D. and M. Montgomery (eds), 1994. Centennial Usage Studies, 78. Tuscaloosa and London: Alabama UP.
  • Marantz, A. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Marchand, H. 1960. The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
  • Marcos Marín, F. 1978. Estudios sobre el pronombre. Madrid: Gredos.
  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2002. Online.
  • Nerbonne, J. et al. 1994. German in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • Perlmutter, D. M. 1978. "Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis". Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: California UP.
  • Perlmutter, D. M. 1984. "Working 1s and inversion in Italian, Japanese, and Quechua". In: Perlmutter D. M. and C. Rosen (eds), 292-330.
  • Perlmutter, D. M. and C. Rosen 1984. Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: Chicago UP.
  • Portero Muñoz, C. 2003. "Derived nominalizations in -ee: a Role and Reference Grammar based semantic analysis". English Language and Linguistics 7, 129-159.[Crossref]
  • Pustejovsky, J. (ed). 1993. Semantics and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Rappaport Hovav, M. and B. Levin, 1992. "-Er nominals: Implications for the theory of argument structure". In: Stowel T. and E. Wehrli (eds), 127-153.
  • Real Academia Española (RAE). 1985. Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. 10th reprinting. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
  • Rosen, C. 1984. "The interface between semantic roles and initial grammatical relations". In: Perlmutter D. M. and C. Rosen (eds), 38-77.
  • Rydén, M. and S. Brorström. 1987. The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English: With Special Reference to the Late Modern Period. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
  • Ryder, M. E. 1999. "Bankers and blue-chippers: an account of -er formation in present-day English". English Language and Linguistics 3, 269-297.[Crossref]
  • Safire, W. 1982. "What is the good word?" New York: Times Books, 63-64.
  • Shibatani, M. 1976. "Causativization". In: Shibatani M. (ed), 239-293.
  • Shibatani, M. (ed). 1976. Sintax and Semantics, Vol. 5: Japanese Generative Grammar. New York: Academic Press, 239-293.
  • Somers, H. L. 1984. "On the validity of the complement-adjunct distinction in valency grammar". Linguistics 22, 507-530.
  • Stowel, T. and E. Wehrli (eds). 1992. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 26: Syntax and the Lexicon. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • van Belle, W. and W. van Langendonck (eds). 1996. The Dative. Vol. 1. Descriptive Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • van Hoecke, W. 1996. "The Latin dative". In: van Belle W. and W. van Langen-donck (eds), 3-37.
  • van Langendonck, W. and W. van Belle (eds). 1998. The dative. Vol. 2. Theoretical and Contrastive Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • van Valin, R. D., Jr. 1990. "Semantic parameters of split intransitivity". Language 66, 221-260.[Crossref]
  • van Valin, R. D., Jr. and R. J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
  • Wasow, T. 1977. "Transformations and the Lexicon". In: Culicover P. et al. (eds), 327-360.
  • Wechsler, S. 1995. The Semantic Basis of Argument Structure. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • Whitley, S. 2002. Spanish/English Contrasts. Washington: Georgetown UP.
  • Zamora Vicente, A. 1960. Dialectología española. Madrid: Gredos.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.