Grammar Learning Strategies and Language Attainment: Seeking a Relationship

• Authors: Mirosław Pawlak
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Despite major advances in research on language learning strategies, there are still areas that have received only scant attention, and one of them is undoubtedly learning grammar. The paper contributes to the paucity of empirical investigations in this domain by presenting the findings of a study which sought to investigate the relationship between the use of grammar learning strategies (GLS) reported by 142 English Department students and target language attainment, operationalized as their performance in a practical grammar course and the end-of-the-year examination. Information about GLS use was obtained by means of a tool that was designed on the basis of a theoretical scheme proposed by Oxford, Rang Lee and Park (2007) in which GLS are divided into three categories depending on whether they represent implicit learning with focus on form, explicit inductive learning and explicit deductive learning. The analysis failed to find a strong positive relationship between the use of GLS and achievement, irrespective of the level of the BA program, or statistically significant differences in this respect between lower-level and higher-level participants. The highest, albeit very weak, correlation was identified between the use of GLS associated with explicit deductive learning and grammar course grades, which testifies to the traditional nature of instruction the subjects receive. The findings serve as a basis for putting forward a handful of recommendations for learning, teaching and testing grammar as well as directions for future studies into grammar learning strategies.

Keywords

EN

grammar learning strategies; language attainment; language proficiency; instructional mode

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2009
• Volume: 7
• Pages: 43-60

Dates

published

2009-01-01

online

2009-12-23

Contributors

author

Mirosław Pawlak

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Kalisz

References

• Anderson, N. 2005. L2 learning strategies. In Hinkel, E. (ed.). 2005. 757-771.
• Bade, M. 2008. Grammar and good language learners. In Griffiths, C. (ed.). 2008b. 174-184.
• Bialystok, E. 1981. The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal 65. 24-35.
• Bremner, S. 1999. Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in Hong Kong. Canadian Modern Language Review 55. 490-514.[Crossref]
• Carter, R. and Nunan, D. (eds). 2001. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chamot, A. U. 2004. Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 1. 12-25.
• Cohen, A. D. and Macaro, E. (eds). 2007. Language learner strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• DeKeyser, R. 2003. Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. (eds). 2003. 313-348.
• Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Doughty, C. J. 2003. Instructed SLA. In Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. (eds). 2003. 256-310.
• Doughty, C. J. and Long, M. H. (eds). 2003. The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford.: Blackwell.
• Dreyer, C. and Oxford, R. L. 1996. Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In Oxford, R. L. (ed.). 2001b. 61-74.
• Droździał-Szelest, K. 1997. Language learning strategies in the process of acquiring a foreign language. Poznań: Motivex.
• Erhman, M., Leaver, B. and Oxford, R. L. 2003. A brief overview of individual differences in language learning. System 31. 313-330.
• Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition (first edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ellis, R. 1997. SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ellis, R. 2006. Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40. 83-107.[Crossref]
• Ellis, R. 2008. The study of second language acquisition (second edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fortune, A. 1992. Self-study grammar practice: Learners' views and preferences. ELT Journal 46. 160-171.[Crossref]
• Green, J. M. and Oxford, R. L. 1995. A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly 29. 261-297.
• Grenfell, M. and Macaro, E. 2007. Claims and critiques. In Cohen, A. D. and Macaro, E. (eds). 2007. 9-28.
• Griffiths, C. 2008a. Strategies and good language learners. In Griffiths, C. (ed.). 2008b. 83-98
• Griffiths, C. 2008b. (ed.). Lessons form good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hinkel, E. (ed.). 2005. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Karmiloff-Smith, A. 1979. A functional approach to child language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Larsen-Freeman, D. 2003. Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Toronto: Thomson and Heinle.
• Macaro, E. 2001. Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms. London: Continuum.
• Macaro, E. 2006. Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal 90. 320-337.[Crossref]
• Magogwe, J. M. and Oliver, R. 2007. The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System 35. 338-352.
• McDonough, S. 1999. Learner strategies. Language Teaching 32. 1-18.[Crossref]
• Mullins, P. Y. 1992. Successful English language learning strategies of students enrolled at the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Unpublished PhD dissertation, International University, San Diego, CA.
• Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. 2008a. The use of grammar learning strategies among secondary school students. In Pawlak, M. (ed.). 2008b. 139-148.
• Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. 2008b. Rozwijanie autonomii przy użyciu Europejskiego portfolio językowego a podnoszenie poziomu poprawności gramatycznej [Developing autonomy by means of the European Language Portfolio and increasing grammatical accuracy. In Pawlak, M. (ed.). 2008c. 197-206.
• Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H. and Todesco, A. 1996 (1978). The good language learner. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
• Nisbet, D. L., Tindall, E. R. and Arroyo, A. A. 2005. Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Chinese university students. Foreign Language Annals 38. 100-107.[Crossref]
• Oliphant, K. 1997. Acquisition of grammatical gender in Italian as a foreign language. (Net Work #7). Honolulu: University of Hawaii
• O'Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. 1990. Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Osanai, D. 2000. Differences in language learning strategies between male and female, and also between Asian and Latino ESL students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
• Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, M.A.: Heinle.
• Oxford, R. L. 2001. Language learning strategies. In Carter, R. and Nunan, D. (eds). 2001. 166-172.
• Oxford, R. L. (ed.). 2001b. Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
• Oxford, R. L. and Ehrman, M. 1995. Adults' language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System 23. 359-386.
• Oxford. R. L., Rang Lee, K. and Park, G. 2007. L2 grammar strategies: the Second Cinderella and beyond. In Cohen, A. D. and Macaro, E. (eds). 2007. 117-139.
• Park, G. P. 1994. Language learning strategies: Why do adults need them?. Manuscript, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
• Park, G. P. 1997. Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean university students. Foreign Language Annals 30. 211-221.[Crossref]
• Pawlak, M. 2006. The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Kalisz-Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
• Pawlak, M. 2008a. Advanced learners' use of strategies for learning grammar: A diary study. In Pawlak, M. (ed.). 2008b. 109-125.
• Pawlak, M. (ed.). 2008b. Investigating English language learning and teaching. Poznań - Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
• Pawlak, M. (ed.). 2008c. Autonomia w nauce języka obcego - co osiągnęliśmy i dokąd zmierzamy [Autonomy in language learning: Achievement and prospects for the future]. Poznań - Kalisz - Konin: Adam Mickiewicz University Press and State School of Higher Professional Education in Konin Press.
• Pawlak, M. 2009a. Instructional mode and the use of grammar learning strategies. In Pawlak, M. (ed.). 2009.
• Pawlak, M. (ed.). 2009b. New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (Special issues of Studies in Pedagogy and Fine Arts Vol. VIII). Poznań - Kalisz: Adam Mickiewicz University Press.
• Philips, V. 1991. A look at learner strategy use and ESL proficiency. The CATESOL Journal 4. 57-67.
• Politzer, R. L. and McGroarty, M. 1985. An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly 19. 103-123.[Crossref]
• Reiss, M. A. The good language learner: Another look. Canadian Modern Language Review 41. 511-23.
• Rubin, J. 1975. What the ‘Good Language Learner’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9. 41-51.[Crossref]
• Sheorey. R. 1999. An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System 27. 173-190.
• Stern, H. H. 1975. What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review 31. 304-318.
• Stevens, F. 1984. Strategies for second language acquisition. Montreal: Eden Press.
• Takeuchi, O. 1993. Language learning strategies and their relationship to achievement in English as a foreign language. Language Laboratory 30. 17-34.
• Takeuchi, O., Griffiths, C. and Coyle, D. 2007. Applying strategies to contexts: The role of individual, situational, and group differences. In Cohen, A. D. and Macaro, E. (eds). 2007. 69-92.
• Tilfarlioğlu, Y. 2005. An analysis of the relationship between the use of grammar learning strategies and student achievement at English preparatory classes. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 1. 155-169.
• Wharton. G. 2000. Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning 50. 203-243.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10015-009-0004-7