Questionnaire-based pronunciation studies: Italian, Spanish and polish students’ views on their English pronunciation

• Authors: Marta Nowacka
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article is an attempt to review the most recent phonetic literature on the application of questionnaires in phonetic studies. In detail, we review the scope of pronunciation questionnaire-based surveys with respect to Polish and non-Polish students of English. In addition, this paper aims to examine European students’ beliefs and attitudes towards their own English pronunciation and is also intended to provide some arguments for or against the use of foreign-accented rather than native models of pronunciation in phonetic instruction. The data come from three groups of informants, namely: Italian, Spanish and Polish students of English. With respect to foreign, non-Polish respondents, the study was conducted at the University of Salento in Italy and the University in Vigo, Spain within the framework of the Erasmus Teacher Mobility Programme in two consecutive academic years: i.e. 2010/2011 and 2011/2012. As regards Polish respondents, our research involved subjects from six different tertiary schools, i.e. five universities and one college, located in various parts of Poland. On balance, the results of our study give an insight into the phonetic preferences of adult European advanced students of English with reference to the importance of good native-like pronunciation, the aims of pronunciation study, factors contributing to phonetic progress and their self-study pronunciation learning strategies. Our findings point to the fact that students of English wish to speak with good pronunciation, set a high native-like standard for themselves, report having benefited from their phonetic instruction and exposure to native English and that they work on their pronunciation by means of various, mostly cognitive, strategies. Rather than casting new light on teaching pronunciation, the outcome of this study is consistent with the findings of other research on foreign students’ choice of preferred pronunciation model, which is undeniably native rather than foreign-accented.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2011
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 43-61

Dates

published

2012-10-01

online

2012-10-21

Contributors

author

Marta Nowacka

• University of Rzeszów

References

• Baran, M. 2006. Phonetics learning preferences of Polish students. Field dependence, field independence as a moderate variable. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego V [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 5], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 9-22. Płock: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Barrera Pardo, D. 2004. Can Pronunciation Be Taught? A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 17: 6-38 (http:,,publicaciones.ua.es,filespubli,pdf,02144808RD22945419.pdf) (date of access: 6 December, 2011).
• Basso, R. 2000. Pronunciation: Student Awareness of Learning Styles. Speak Out! 26: 4-11.
• Benrabah, M. 2010. English Pronunciation Preferences: Research by ‘Indirect’ Questionnaire. In English Pronunciation: Issues and Practices (EPIP): Proceedings of the First International Conference, ed. A. Henderson, 37-53. Chambery Cedex: Université de Savoie.
• Bradford, B. and J. Kenworthy. 1991. Phonology on Teacher Training Courses, Speak Out! 9: 12-15.
• Bryła, A. 2006. European veto to the ideological assumptions of the LFC voiced by continental learners of English (survey analysis), In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego w Polsce VI [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 6], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 18-35. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Celce-Murcia, M., D. Brinton and J. M. Goodwin. 1996. Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cenoz, J. and M. L. Garcia-Lecumberri. 1999. The acquisition of English pronunciation: learners’ views, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 9: 3-15.
• Ciszewski, T. 2004. Transkrypcja fonetyczna. Mity i uprzedzenia [Phonetic transcription. Myths and prejudice]. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego IV [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 4], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 28-34. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Dalton, Ch. and U. Smit. 1997. On the motivation of advanced pronunciation learners. Speak Out! 21: 5-9.
• Dörnyei, Z. 2003. Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Droździał-Szelest, K. 1997. Language learning strategies in the process of acquiring a foreign language. Poznań: Motivex.
• Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., J. Weckwerth and J. Zborowska. 1999. Teaching phonetics at the School of English, AMU, Poznań, Poland. In Proceedings of Phonetics Teaching & Learning Conference, 31-34. UCL, London, 14-15 April 1999, http:,,www.phon.ucl.ac.uk,home,johnm,poznan.htm (date of access: 26 March, 2007).
• Edwards, M. 1992. Modelos lingüísticos de la enseńanza aprendizaje de segundas lenguas: la enseńanza-aprendizaje del sistema fonológico del inglés en hispanohablantes, In Bilingüísmo y adquisición de lenguas: Actas del IX Congreso Nacional de AESLA, eds. F. Etxeberría and J. Arzamendi, 219-229. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
• Fraser, H. 2001. Teaching Pronunciation: A handbook for teachers and trainers: Three frameworks for an Integrated Approach. New South Wales: Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs, DETYA, http:,,www-personal.une.edu.au,~hfraser, (date of access: 26 March, 2007).
• Gatbonton, E., P. Trofimovich and M. Magid. 2005. Learners’ Ethnic Group Affiliation and L2 Pronunciation Accuracy: A Sociolinguistic Investigation, TESOL Quarterly 39, 3: 467-488.
• Gonet, W. 2006. Success in the acquisition of English phonetics by Poles. A pilot study. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego w Polsce VI [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 6], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 70-88. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Gut, U. 2007. Learner corpora in second language prosody research and teaching. In Non-Native Prosody: Phonetic Description and Teaching Practice, eds. J. Trouvain and U. Gut, 145-167. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Henderson, A. in press. The English Pronunciation Teaching in Europe Survey (EPTiES) and the collaborative generation of new knowledge, paper presented at Accents’2010: IV International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English, University of Łódź, 9-11 December 2010. http:,,www.filolog.uni.lodz.pl,accents2010,Abstracts.htm#smo) (date of access: 7 February, 2010).
• Henderson, A., D. Frost, U. Cunningham, A. Kautzsch, A. Kirkova-Naskova, D. Levey, E. Tergujef and E. Waniek-Klimczak. in press. Joint Session on English Pronunciation Teaching in Europe Survey, paper presented at Accents’ 2011: V International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English, Univeristy of Łódź, 15-17 December 2011.
• Hu, X. and S. M. Reiterer. 2009. Personality and pronunciation talent in second language acquisition, In Language Talent and Brain Activity, eds. G. Dogil and S. M. Reiterer, 97-129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Janicka, K. 2005. Pronunciation standards of English for non-native speakers of English: A case against Lingua Franca Core. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University.
• Janicka, K., M. Kul and J. Weckwerth. 2008. Polish Students’ Attitudes to Native English Accents as Models for EFL Pronunciation, In English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and J. Przedlacka, 251-292. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Josipović Smojver, V. and M.-M. Stanojević. 2010. Stratification of EFL: identity constructions of learners and speakers, paper presented at: Accents’ 2010: IV International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English, University of Łódź, 9-11 December 2010. http:,,www.filolog.uni.lodz.pl,accents2010,Abstracts.htm#smo (date of access: 7 February, 2010).
• Keys, K. J. 1999. Making the right noises: pronunciation and teacher training in Brazil, Speak Out! 24: 40-44.
• Luke, Ch. [nd]. Lesson plan for student teachers: creative ways of teaching pronunciation in FLE classes. http:,,www.edb.utexas.edu,field, seminar29.html (date of access: 26 March, 2007).
• MacDonald, S. 2002. Pronunciation - views and practices of reluctant teachers, Prospect. Australian Journal of TESOL 17,3: 3-15.
• Murphy, D. in press. Evaluation of a pedagogical model of L2 pronunciation learning: the case for a mixed methods approach, Abstracts ‘Accents 2011’: 17, paper presented at Accents’ 2011: V International Conference on Native and Nonnative Accents of English, University of Łódź, 15-17 December 2011, http:,,filolog.uni.lodz.pl,accents2011,Abstracts.htm (date of access: 29 November, 2011).
• Murphy, J. 1997. Phonology courses offered by METASOL programmes in the US, TESOL Quarterly 31: 741-764.[Crossref]
• Nardo, D. and S. M. Reiterer. 2009. Musicality and the phonetic language aptitude. In Language Talent and Brain Activity, eds. G. Dogil and S. M. Reiterer (eds.), 213-255. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Nasser-Eddine, A. 2011. Second language acquisition: the articulation of vowels and the importance of tools in the learning process. In The Acquisition of L2 Phonology, eds. J. Arabski and A. Wojtaszek, 3-15. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Nowacka, M. 2008. Phonetic Attainment in Polish University and College Students of English: a Study in the Productive and Receptive Pronunciation Skills. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University.
• Nowacka, M. 2010. Native and Non-native Perception of Foreign-accented Speech: Do Polish and English raters have the same ear for nativelikness?. In Issues in Accents of English 2: Variability and Norm, ed. E. Waniek-Klimczak, 61-96. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Pawlak, M. 2006. On the use of pronunciation learning strategies by Polish foreign language learners. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego w Polsce VI [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 6], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 121-135. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Pawlak, M. 2008. Another look at the use of pronunciation learning strategies: an advanced learner’s perspective. In Issues in Accents of English, ed. E. Waniek-Klimczak, 304-322. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Pawlak, M. 2010. Designing and piloting a tool for the measurement of the use of pronunciation learning strategies, In Research in Language: Special Issue on Researching Variability and Teaching Accents of English 8, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak and L. Shockey, 189-202. Łódź: Łódź University Press.
• Pawlak, M. in press. The use of questionnaires in research on learning and teaching second language pronunciation, Abstracts ‘Accents 2011’: 25, paper presented at Accents’ 2011: V International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English, University of Łódź, 15-17 December 2011, http:,,filolog.uni.lodz.pl,accents2011,Abstracts.htm (date of access: 29 November, 2011).
• Peterson, S. 2000. Pronunciation Learning Strategies: A first look. Unpublished research report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 450 599, FL 026 618).
• Porter, D. and S. Garvin. 1989. Attitudes to Pronunciation in EFL. Speak Out! 5: 8-14.
• Pospieszyńska, M. and B. Wolski. 2003. Elementy fonetyki suprasegmentalnej w kontekście rozumienia tzw. tekstów autentycznych [The elements of suprasegmental phonetics in the context of authentic text comprehension]. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego II [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 2], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 79-85. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Presser, S., J. M. Rothgeb, M. P. Couper, J. T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin and E. Singer (eds). 2004. Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.
• Rajadurai, J. 2001. An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Teaching Pronunciation to Malaysian TESL Students. Forum 39: 10-17. http:,,exchanges.state.gov,forum,vols,vol39,no3,p10.htm (date of access: 26 March, 2007).
• Remiszewski, M. 2008. Lingua Franca Core: Picture Incomplete. In English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and J. Przedlacka, 293-308. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Scheuer, S. 2008. Why Native Speakers are (Still) Relevant? In English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and J. Przedlacka, 111-130. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Scheuer, S. in press. Why Polish and French students of English do not sound the same., Abstract ‘Accents 2011’: 33, paper presented at Accents’ 2011: V International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English, University of Łódź, 15-17 December 2011, http:,,filolog.uni.lodz.pl,accents2011,Abstracts.htm (date of access: 29 November, 2011).
• Sifakis, N. S. and A.-M. Sougari. 2005. Pronunciation Issues and EIL Pedagogy in the Periphery: A Survey of Greek State School Teachers’ Beliefs, TESOL Quarterly 39, 3: 467-488.[Crossref]
• Sobkowiak, W. 2002. English speech in Polish eyes: What university students think about English pronunciation teaching and learning. In Accents and speech in teaching English phonetics and phonology, eds. E. Waniek-Klimczak and P. J. Melia, 177-96. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Sobkowiak, W. 2008. Why Not LFC? In English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and J. Przedlacka (eds), 131-149. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Stanojević, M.-M., V., Kabalin-Borenić and V., Josipović-Smojver. in press. Combining three types of data in studying attitudes to English as a Lingua Franca, Abstracts ‘Accents 2011’: 43, paper presented at Accents’ 2011: V International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English, University of Łódź, 15-17 December 2011, http:,,filolog.uni.lodz.pl,accents2011,Abstracts.htm (date of access: 29 November, 2011).
• Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2008. Lingua Franca Core, Phonetic Universals and the Polish Context. In English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and J. Przedlacka, 151-176. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2004. Jaki model wymowy angielskiej? - dyskusji ciąg dalszy [What model of English pronunciation? - discussion continued]. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego IV [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 4], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 116-123. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Szpyra-Kozłowska, J., J. Frankiewicz and W. Gonet. 2002. Aspekty fonetyki angielskiej nauczane w polskich szkołach średnich [Aspects of English phonetics taught in Polish secondary schools]. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego I [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 1], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 9-27. Płock: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Szpyra-Kozłowska, J., J. Frankiewicz and R. Święcicki. 2006. The language laboratory and modern pronunciation pedagogy. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego V [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 5], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 285-303. Płock: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. and I. Pawlak. 2010. Listener attitudes to male and female voices. In Issues in Accents of English 2: Variability and norm, ed. E. Waniek-Klimczak, 115-132. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Timmis, I. 2002. Native-speaker norms and international English:
• A classroom view. ELT Journal 56, 3: 240-249.
• Tyurina, S. and L. Koltzova. in press. ESP teaching or does accent matter in professional discourse, Abstracts ‘Accents 2011’: 48, paper presented at Accents’ 2011: V International Conference on Native and Non-native Accents of English, University of Łódź, 15-17 December 2011, http:,,filolog.uni.lodz.pl,accents2011,Abstracts.htm (date of access: 29 November, 2011).
• Vishnevskaya, G. 2008. Foreign Accent: Phonetic and Communication Hazards. In Issues in Accents of English, ed. E. Waniek-Klimczak, 235-251. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
• Walker, R. 1999. Proclaimed and perceived wants and needs among Spanish teachers of English, Speak Out! 24: 25-32.
• Waniek-Klimczak, E. 1997. Context for Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology at Polish Universities and Colleges: A Survey. In Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology II: Accents’ 97, ed. E. Waniek-Klimczak (ed.), 5-17. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Waniek-Klimczak, E. and K. Klimczak. 2008. Target in Speech Development: Learners’ Views. In English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene, eds. K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk and J. Przedlacka, 229-249. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Wrembel, M. 2002. Miejsce fonetyki języka angielskiego w szkole [The place of English language phonetics at school]. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego I [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 1], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 29-40. Płock: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Wrembel, M. 2003. Rola metakompetencji w akwizycji fonologii języka obcego w świetle badań dotyczących efektywności procesu nauczania wymowy [The role of metacompetence in the acquisition of foreign language phonology]. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego II [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 2], eds. W. Sobkowiak and E. Waniek-Klimczak, 150-158. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Wrembel, M. 2005. The role of metacompetence in the acquisition of foreign language pronunciation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Poznań: Adam Mickiewicz University.
• Wysocka, H. 2003. Czy i jak uczyć fonetyki języka obcego? [Shall we teach the phonetics of as foreign language, and how to do it?]. In Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego II [Phonetics in Foreign Language Teaching 2], eds. W. Sobkowiak, E. Waniek-Klimczak, 159-184. Konin: Wydawnictwo PWSZ.
• Yeou. M. 2010. Pronunciation Instruction in Moroccan Higher Education: Students’ Attitudes and Teachers’ Views. In English Language Teaching and the Reform of University Studies, eds. S. Diouny and M. Yeou, 55-77. Publication de Faculté des Lettres: Chouaib Doukkali. Casblanca: Impremerie Najah, http:,,ucd.academia.edu,MohamedYeou,Papers,459522,Teaching_pronunciation_in_the_New_Educational_Reform_Students_attitudes_and_current_practice (date of access: 29 November, 2011).
• ---

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10015-011-0048-3