Transfer, similarity or lack of awareness? inconsistencies of German learners in the pronunciation of lot, thought, strut, palm and bath

• Authors: Alexander Kautzsch
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The current study presents acoustic analyses of non-high back vowels and low central vowels in the lexical sets LOT, THOUGHT, STRUT, PALM and BATH as pronounced by German learners of English. The main objective is to show that learners of English at university level are highly inconsistent in approximating the vowels of their self-chosen target accents British English (BrE) and American English (AmE). To that end, the acoustic qualities of the English vowels of learners are compared to their native German vowels and to the vowels of native speakers of BrE and AmE. In order to facilitate statements about the effect of increased experience, the study differentiates between students in their first year at university and in their third year or later. The results obtained are highly variable: In some cases the learners transfer their L1 vowels to English, other cases show clear approximations to the target vowels, while other cases again document the production of new vowels neither found in German nor in English. However, close approximation to the target vowels only sometimes correlates with higher proficiency. This might be an indicator of a low level of awareness of systematic differences between the BrE and AmE vowel systems. But the data also indicate that the more advanced learners produce more distinct AmE BATH vowels and BrE THOUGHT vowels than the less advanced learners, which points to a partial increase of awareness resulting from increased experience. All in all it seems that raising the awareness of differences between target accents in L2 instruction is necessary if the envisage goal is for learners to reach near-native pronunciation.

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2012
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 225-241

Dates

published

2012-10-01

online

2012-10-21

Contributors

author

Alexander Kautzsch

• University of Regenburg

References

• Best, C. and W. Strange. 1992. "Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on crosslanguage perception of approximants". Journal of Phonetics 20: 305-331.
• Best, C. 1994. "The emergence of native-language phonological influence in infants: A perceptual assimilation model." In H. Nusbaum, J. Goodman and C. Howard, eds. The Transition from Speech Sounds to Spoken Words: The Development of Speech Perception. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 167-224.
• Best, C. 1995. "A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception." In Strange, ed. 1995: 171-204.
• Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. No date. "Praat: Doing phonetics by computer". [www.praat.org; accessed 31/06/2011] .
• Bohn, O.-S. 2002. "On phonetic similarity". In P. Burmeister, T. Piske and A. Rohde, eds. An Integrated View of Language Development. Trier: WVT, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, 191-216.
• Deterding, D. 1990. "Speaker Normalization for Automatic Speech Recognition". Ph.D.Thesis, Cambridge University.
• Deterding, D. 1997. "The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation". Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27: 47-55.
• Deterding, David, Jennie Wong and Andy Kirkpatrick. 2008. "The pronunciation of Hong Kong English". English World-Wide 29(2): 148-175.
• Flege, J. E. 1995. "Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems". In Strange, ed. 1995: 233-277.
• Gass, S. M. and Selinker, L. 2008. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (3rd ed.). New York and London: Routledge.
• Hansen Edwards, J.G. and M.L. Zampini, eds. 2008. Phonology and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Hillenbrand, J., L. A. Getty, M. J. Clark and K. Wheeler. 1995. "Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels". Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5):3099-3111.[WoS]
• Kautzsch, A. 2010a. "Exploring L1 transfer in German Learners of English: High front vowels, high back vowels and the BED/BAD distinction." Research in Language (Special Issue: Proceedings of ACCENTS 2009, Lodz) 8: 63-84.
• Kautzsch , A. 2010b. Rhoticity in German Learners of English. Paper presented at World Englishes 2010 in Vancouver, Canada, August 2010.
• Kendall, T. and E.R. Thomas. 2010. "Vowels: Vowel Manipulation, Normalization, and Plotting in R. R package, version 1.1." [Software Resource: http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/ ]
• Kortmann, B. 2005. "Chapter V: Contrastive Linguistics: English and German". In B. Kortmann. 2005. Linguistics: Essentials. Berlin: Cornelsen, 156-191.
• Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.
• Kuhl, P.K. 1991. "Human adults and human infants exhibit a perceptual magnet effect for the prototypes of speech sounds, monkeys do not." Perception and Psychophysics 50: 93-107.[PubMed]
• Kuhl, P.K. 1993. "Early linguistic experience and phonetic perception: implications for theories of developmental speech perception." Journal of Phonetics 21: 125-139.
• Major, R. C. 2008. "Transfer in second language phonology. A review." In: Hansen Edwards and Zampini, eds. 2008: 63-94.
• Labov, W., S. Ash and C. Boberg. 2006. The Atlas of North American English. Berlin: Mouton-de Gruyter.
• Schmidt, R. 1990. "The role of consciousness in second language learning." Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
• Schmidt, R. 1994. "Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial grammars and SLA." In N. Ellis, ed. Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages. London: Academic Press, 165-209.
• Schmidt, R. 1995. "Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning." In R. Schmidt, ed. Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, 1-63.
• Schmidt, R. 2001. "Attention." In P. Robinson, ed. Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-32.
• Schmidt, R. 2010. "Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning". In W. M. Chan, S. Chi, K. N. Cin, J. Istanto, M. Nagami, J. W. Sew, T. Suthiwan and I. Walker. Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, Singapore. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies, 721-737.
• Schmidt, R. and S.N. Frota. 1986. "Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese." In R. R. Day, ed. Talking to Learn: Conversation in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 237-326.
• Selinker, L. 1972. "Interlanguage". International Review of Applied Linguistics 10, 209-231.
• Strange, W. 2007. "Cross-language phonetic similarity of vowels. Theoretical and methodological issues." In O.-S. Bohn and M.J. Munro, eds. 2007. Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning. In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 35-56.
• Strange, W. and V.L. Shafer. 2008. "Speech perception in second language learners: There-education of selective perception." In: Edwards and Zampini, eds. 2008: 153-192.
• Strange, W. ed. 1995. Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research, Baltimore: York Press.
• The R Project for Statistical Computing. No date. "R". [www.r-project.org/, accessed 31/06/2011].
• Thomas, E. R. and T. Kendall. 2007. NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. [http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/, accessed: 07/06/2012].
• Traunmüller, H. 1997. "Auditory scales of frequency representation". [http://www2.ling.su.se/staff/hartmut/bark.htm, accessed: 07/06/2012].
• Wells, J.C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• ---

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10015-011-0029-6