The Phonological Process with Two Patterns of Simplified Chinese Characters

• Authors: Zheng Jin , Junehee Lee , Yang Lee
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper analyzed word recognition in two patterns of Chinese characters, cross referenced with word frequency. The patterns were defined as uni-part (semantic radical/component only) and bi-part (including the phonetic radical/component and the semantic radical/component) characters. The interactions of semantic and phonological access in both patterns were inspected. It was observed that in the naming task and the pronunciation-matching task, the subject performance involving the uni-part characters showed longer RT than the bi-part characters. However, with the lexical decision and meaning-matching tasks the uni-part characters showed shorter RT than the bi-part characters. It was also observed that the frequency, which is regarded as a lexical variable, displayed a strong influence. This suggests that Chinese characters require lexical access in all tasks. This study also suggested that the phonological process is primary in visual word recognition; as there is a significant phonological effect in processing the Chinese bi-part characters, resulting in either the facilitation or inhibition of phonology due to the differing demands of the two tasks

Keywords

EN

phonological process; lexical access; word frequency; Chinese character; bilingual

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 11
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 389-403

Dates

published

2013-12-01

online

2014-03-11

Contributors

author

Zheng Jin

• Institute of Educational Science, Zhengzhou Normal University, China,

author

Junehee Lee

• Department of psychology, Gyeongsang National University, Korea

author

Yang Lee

• Department of psychology, Gyeongsang National University, Korea,

References

• Baron, J., & Strawson, C. 1976. Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(3), 386-393.[Crossref]
• Chen, M. J., Yung, Y. F., & Ng, T. W. 1988. The effect of context on the perception of Chinese characters. In: I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen & M. J. Chen (eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 27-39). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.
• Coltheart, M. (1985). Cognitive neuropsychology and the study of reading. In: M. I.Posner., & G. S. M. Matin (eds.) Attention and d performance XI (pp. 3~37).Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
• Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Hailer, M. 1993. Models of reading aloud: dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological review, 100(4), 589-608.[Crossref]
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. 2001. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Coslett, H. B. 1991. Read but not write “idea”: evidence for a third reading mechanism.Brain and Language, 40(4), 425-443.[Crossref]
• Hoosain, R., & Osgood, C. E. 1983. Information processing times for English and Chinese words. Perception and Psychophysics, 34, 573-577.Hsieh. Shu-K. (Eds.) 2006. [Crossref]
• Hanzi, Concept and Computation: a preliminary survey of Chinese characters as a knowledge resource in Natural Language Processing.Tobias-lib: ub Tübingen, Germany.
• Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. 1981. Orthographic variations and visual information Processing. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 377-414.[PubMed][Crossref]
• Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L. & Tzeng, A. K. Y. 1992. Automatic activation of linguistic information in Chinese character recognition. In: R. Frost & L. Katz (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 119-130). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
• Jean, G. (Eds.) 1992. The story of alphabets and scripts. London: Thames& Hudson.
• Jin Z. Nonselective access of English phonology in bi-scriptal Chinese-Korean visual word recognition. Cognitive Processing, 2013, 14, 435-441.[WoS][PubMed]
• Lee, Y. 2003. The orthographical processes. In M. Jo (eds.), Psycholinguistics,edited (pp. 67-97). Seoul: Hakjisa.
• Lee, Y., Moreno, A. M., Park, H., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. 2006. Phonological assimilation & visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(6), 513-530.[Crossref]
• Leong, C. K. 1986. What does accessing a morphemic script tell us about reading and reading disorders in an alphabetic script? Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 82-102.[Crossref]
• Levelt, W. J. M. 1999. Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Science, 3(6), 223-232.
• Lukatela, G., Frost, S. J., & Turvey, M. T. 1999. Identity priming in English is compromised by phonological ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 775-790.[Crossref]
• Mattingly, I. G. 1992. Linguistic awareness and orthographic form. In R. Frost & L.
• Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, mo1phology, and meaning (pp. 11-26). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
• Neely, J. H. 1991. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). \
• Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. 1985. From orthography to phonology: an attempt at an old interpretation. In: K.E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall & M. Coltheart, Surface dyslexia: neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 335-359).
• Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Peng, D. L., Guo, D. J. & Zhang, S. L. 1985. The retrieval of information of Chinese characters in making similarity judgment under recognition condition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 17, 227-234.
• Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y. , & Tan, L. H. 2002. How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing system approach. In H. S. R. Kao, C.K. Leong, & D. G. Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 36-60). Hong Kong: University Press.
• Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. 2005. The Lexical Constituency Model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43-59.[Crossref][PubMed]
• Perfetti, C. A. & Tan, L. H. 1998a. The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in visual Chinese character identification, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24: 101-118.
• Perfetti, C. A. & Tan, L. H. 1998b. The constituency model of Chinese character identification. In: J. Wang, A. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (in press).
• Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. 1991. Phonemic processes in reading Chinese words, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 633-643.
• Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. 1995. The universal word identification reflex. The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 33 (pp. 159-189). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
• Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. 1989. The distributed development model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev, 96, 523-568.
• Strain, E., Patterson, K. E., & Seidenberg, M. S. 1995. Semantic influence on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: leaning, memory, and cognition, 21, 1140-1154.[WoS]
• Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. 1997a. Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning?, Journal of Memory and Language 37: 41-57.
• Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. 1998. Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts.Reading and Writing, 10, 165-200.[Crossref]
• Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R. & Siok,W.W. T. 1996. The activation of phonological codes before access to character meaning in written Chinese, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22: 865-883.
• Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. 1994. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291 [Crossref]
• Wang,Q., Chi,Z.R., Feng,D.D., & Zhao,R.C. 2000. “Hidden Markov random field based approach for off-line handwritten Chinese character recognition,” Accepted by the 15th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, Barcelona, Spain.
• Xu, Y., Pollatsek, A., & Potter, M. 1999. The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 838-857.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/rela-2013-0005