H. Cohens Ethik und ihre Rezeption in der russischen Philosophie des Rechts

• Authors: Belov, Vladimir

Title variants

EN

Cohen’s ethics and its reception in the Russian philosophy of law

Abstracts

EN

The article draws attention to one remarkable feature in the perception of the Hermann Cohen doctrine in Russia, namely special attention on the part of Russian philosophers of the twentieth century to the turn of the ethical theories of the founder of the Marburg school of neo-Kantianism. In Russia, the most representative approach to the analysis of Cohen’s ethical theories is one conducted from the perspective of the philosophy of law. Ethical theories of the Marburg philosopher were in the center of scientific debate of the most famous Russian theorists of law – P.I. Novgorodtsev, B.A. Kistyakovsky, E.V. Spektorsky. The appeal rights of Russian theorists to analyze ethical problems Cohen highlighted the relation of law and morality. The central theme of the arguments in this respect was the theme of ethics orientation of the Marburg philosopher on jurisprudence. Of particular importance in view of the historicist and positivist tendencies that prevailed at the end of the 19th century in legal science in Russia, was rehabilitation of Cohen’s and his followers’ the concept of “natural law”. The main drawback of the criticism coming from Russian theorists of law in relation to Cohen is that their approach to the ideas of this great German thinker is not systematic enough, attempting to consider their ethical views independently from other parts of their philosophical constructions.

Keywords

EN

Cohen; ethical theory; philosophy of law; Russian philosophers; neo-Kantianism

• Publisher: Bialystok University Press
• Journal: IDEA. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 27
• Pages: 373-381

Dates

published

2015

Contributors

author

Belov, Vladimir

References

• Savalsky V.A. Grundlagen der Philosophie des Rechts im wissenschaftlichen Idealismus. Marburg Schule der Philosophie. Cohen, Natorp, Stammler et al. T. 1 // Wissenschaftliche Notizen von der Kaiserlichen Universität Moskau, Jurid. Fakultät, Ausg. 33, M., 1909. 361 p. [Savalskij V.A. Osnovi filosofii prava v naučnom idealizme. Marburgskaja shkola filosofii. Kogen, Natorp, Shtammler i dr. T. 1 // Učenii zapiski Moskovskogo Imperatorskogo universiteta, jurid. f-ta, vip. 33].
• Spektorsky E. Aus dem Reich der reinen Ethik // Probleme der Philosophie und Psychologie. 1905. № 78. S. 384–412. [Spektorskij E. Iz oblasti čistoj etiki // Voprosi filosofii i psihologii].
• Nowgoroder P.I. Russischer Anhänger von H. Cohen // Probleme der Philosophie und Psychologie. 1909. № 99. S. 636. [Novgorodzev P.I. Russkij posledovatel G. Kogena // Voprosi filosofii i psihologii].
• Savalsky V. Antwort auf Professor Novgorodtsev // Probleme der Philosophie und Psychologie. № 105. 1910. S. 361. [Savalskij V. Otvet prof. Novgorodzevu // Voprosi filosofii i psihologii].
• N.A. Dmitrieva “Russischer Neukantianismus: Marburgin Russland. Historische und philosophische Essays” M., 2007, S. 213. [Dmitrieva N.A. “Russkoje neokantianstvo: Marburg v Rossii. Istoriko-filosofskije očerki].
• Kistyakovsky B.A. Sozialwissenschaften und Recht // Kistyakovsky B.A. Philosophie und Soziologie des Rechts. St. Petersburg., 1998, S. 233. [Kistjakovskij B.A. Sozialnie nauki i pravo // Kistjakovskij B.A. Filosofija i soziologija prava].
• E.A. Frolova Neukantianische Philosophie des Rechts in Russland in den späten XIX – Anfang XX. M. 2013 S. 194–195. [Frolova E.A. Neokantianskaja filosofija prava v Rossii v konze XIX – načale XX].

Identifiers

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/11320/3944

DOI

10.15290/idea.2015.27.21