PL EN


2017 | Volume 13 | Issue 1 | 110-118
Article title

Expanding the boundaries of compulsory citizenship behavior: Its impact on some organizational outputs

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Researches have mainly been focused on Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) positive effects to organizations. On the other hand, Compulsory Citizenship Behavior (CCB) is a rather new subject in both national and international literature. Transformation of organizational citizenship behaviors, which are expected to have positive effects on the organizational success into CCB due to various administrative and social pressures, brings about numerous negative consequences for employees and the organization. But the quantity of studies conducted on this subject is very limited for the time being. In this framework, the main aim of this study is to contribute to literature by analyzing the dynamics of CCB in a different culture and different line of business. In this study, relations between CCB and some positive and negative organizational attitudes and behaviors are examined. 635 people working in various accommodation businesses have participated in this research. Findings have shown that CCB is positively correlated with negative organizational consequences; and negatively correlated with positive organizational attitudes and behaviors. According to this, manager/supervisor related CCBs increase employees’ intentions to quit work, their level of burnout, job stress, social loafing behaviors, and conflict with their colleagues; and decrease their innovative behaviors, identification with the organization, and individual oriented OCBs.
Year
Volume
Issue
Pages
110-118
Physical description
Dates
published
2017-04-15
Contributors
  • Faculty of Economics and Business, Girne American University, Cyprus (Northern)
author
  • Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, European University of Lefke, Cyprus (Northern)
author
  • Faculty of Aviation and Aeronautical Science, Ozyegin University, Turkey
References
  • Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. 1983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee citizenship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 587-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/255908
  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Niehoff, B. P. (2004). The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 14(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.05.004
  • Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. 1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725.
  • Folger, R. 1993. Justice, motivation and performance beyond role requirements. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3), 239-248. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01419447
  • George J. M., & Brief, A. P. 1992. Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.310
  • Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., & Malshe, A. 2009. Students' perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.37012178
  • Kidwell, R., Mossholder, K. & Benneth, N. 1997. Cohesiveness and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 23(6), 775-793. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300605
  • Kirkman, B.L., & Rosen, B. 1999. Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/256874
  • Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational ıdentification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  • Moorman, R. H. 1991. Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
  • Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. 1994. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475
  • Mulvey, P.W., & Klein, H.J. 1998. The impact of perceived loafing and collective efficacy on group goal processes and group performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74(1), 62-87. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2753
  • Organ, D.W. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, England: Lexington Books.
  • Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. 1995. A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x
  • Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & Mackenzie, S. B. 1997. Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262-270. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.262
  • Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
  • Porpora, D. V. 1989. Four concepts of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19(2), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00144.x
  • Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. 2001. The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306-1314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1306
  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D., & Near, Y. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
  • Spector, P.E., & Jex, S. M. 1998. Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 356-367. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356
  • Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Hoobler, J., & Ensley, M. D. 2004. Moderators of the relationships between coworkers' organizational citizenship behavior and fellow employees' attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.455
  • Turnipseed, D., & Murkison, G. 1996. Organizational citizenship behavior an examination of influence the workplace. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 17, 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437739610111222
  • Van Dyne, L., & Lepine, J. A. 1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108-119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. 2006. Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 36(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2006.00297.x
  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. 2007. Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9034-5
  • Williams, L., & Anderson, S. 1991. Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.mhp-85727e53-6b9d-4bec-9bd9-40ac0505df4e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.