Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 1(10) | 57-77

Article title

Niekeynesowska zależność pomiędzy tempem wzrostu gospodarczego a wielkością dochodów i wydatków publicznych (w relacji do PKB) w latach 2001–2015 w 11 państwach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej należących do Unii Europejskiej

Authors

Selected contents from this journal

Title variants

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Contrary to conventional economics textbooks and the point of view of most politicians reduction in public spending and government deficit can boost economic growth. The most important condition to achieve non-Keynesian effects of fiscal consolidation is reliable and durable nature of the actions taken to alter the future market expectations. But the economic environment is important too. It may strengthen or offset the expansionary effects of consolidation – a period of stagnation in the neighboring countries, preceded by a depreciation of the exchange rate, a common fiscal and monetary expansion, an increase in investors’ appetite for risk, among others, will strengthen them. The analysis of the correlation shows a strong negative relationship between the average level of economic growth and the average size of the public sector in the economy (measured by the level of public revenue and public expenditure in relation to GDP) in the long run in 11 countries of Central and Eastern Europe belonging to the European Union. That’s why a significant and sustainable reduction of public spending in Poland, that allow then for a sustainable reduction of the fiscal burden would accelerate long-term economic growth. The positive effect of the consolidation would be the highest, if these activities were carried out in 2011–2012 and were accompanied by a growth oriented policy mix.

Year

Issue

Pages

57-77

Physical description

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

References

  • Alesina, A.F., Ardagna, S., Large changes in fiscal policy: Taxes versus spending, NBER Working Paper, No. 15438, October 2009.
  • Alesina, A.F., Ardagna, S., The design of fiscal adjustments, NBER Working Paper, No. 18423, September 2012, doi: 10.3386/w18423.
  • Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., Perotti R., Schiantarelli, F., Fiscal policy, profits, and investment, NBER Working Paper, No. 7207, July 1999, doi: 10.3386/w7207.
  • Arin, K.P., Koray, F., Are some taxes different than others? An empirical investigation of the effects of tax policy in Canada, „Empirical Economics” 2006, t. 31, nr 1, doi: 10.1007/s00181-005-0032-7.
  • Auerbach, A.J., Gorodnichenko, Y., Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy, „American Economic Journal: Economic Policy” 2012, t. 4, nr 2, doi: 10.1257/pol.4.2.1.
  • Barry, F., Devereux, M.B., Expansionary fiscal contraction: A theoretical exploration, „Journal of Macroeconomics” 2003, t. 25, nr 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0164-0704(03)00004-1.
  • Batini, N., Callegari, G., Melina, G., Successful austerity in the United States, Europe and Japan, „IMF Working Paper” 2012, nr 190(12).
  • Baum, A., Koester, G., The impact of fiscal policy on economic activity over the business cycle – evidence from a threshold VAR analysis, Deutsche Bundesbank, „Economic Studies” 2011, nr 3.
  • Baxa, J., What data say about the effects of fiscal policy in the Czech Republic?, 2010.
  • Benk, S., Jakab, Z., Non-keynesian effects of fiscal consolidation: An analysis with an estimated DSGE model for the Hungarian economy, „OECD Economics Department Working Paper” 2012, nr 945.
  • Bertola, G., Drazen, A., Trigger points and budget cuts: Explaining the effects of fiscal austerity, „NBER Working Paper” 1991, nr 3844.
  • Blanchard, O., Perotti, R., An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output, „NBER Working Paper” 1999, nr 7269, doi: 10.3386/w7269.
  • Boiciuc, I., The effects of fiscal policy shocks in Romania. A SVAR approach, „Procedia Economics and Finance” 2015, t. 32, doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01578-6.
  • Cieślik, E., Jankowska, E., Górniewicz, G., Piotrowicz, A., Redo, J., Redo, M., Siemiątkowski, P., Ekonomiczne aspekty integracji wybranych państw Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, Toruń 2015.
  • Cuaresma, J.C., Eller, M., Mehrotra, A., The economic transmission of fiscal policy shocks from western to eastern Europe, „BOFIT Discussion Paper” 2011, nr 12.
  • de Castro, F.F., de Cos, P.H., The economic effects of exogenous fiscal shocks in Spain, a SVAR approach, „ECB Working Paper” 2006, nr 647.
  • Edelberg, W., Eichenbaum, M., Fisher, J.D.M., Understanding the effects of a shock to government purchases, „Review of Economic Dynamics” 1999, t. 2, nr 1, doi:10.1006/redy.1998.0036.
  • Égert, B., Fiscal policy reaction to the cycle in the OECD: pro- or counter-cyclical?, „OECD Economics Department Working Paper” 2010, nr 76.
  • Fels, G., Froehlich, H.P., Germany and the world economy: A German view, „Economic Policy” 1987, t. 2, nr 4.
  • Franta, M., Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy in the Czech Republic: Evidence based on various identification approaches in a VAR framework, „Czech National Bank Working Paper” 2012, nr 13.
  • Giavazzi, F., Pagano, M., Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary tales from two small European economies, „NBER Macroeconomics Annual” 1990, t. 5.
  • Giudice, G., Turrini, A., in’t Veld, J., Non-keynesian fiscal adjustments? A close look at expansionary fiscal consolidations in the EU, „Open Economies Review” 2007, t. 18, nr 5, doi: 10.1007/s11079-007-9026-8.
  • Guajardo, J., Leigh, D., Pescatori, A., Expansionary austerity: New international evidence, „IMF Working Paper” 2011, nr 158(11).
  • Hellwig, M., Neumann, M.J.M., Vaubel, R., Miller, M., Economic policy in Germany: Was there a turnaround?, „Economic Policy” 1987, t. 2, nr 5, doi: 10.2307/1344622.
  • Hemming, R., Kell, M., Mahfouz, S., The effectiveness of fiscal policy in stimulating economic activity: a review of the literature, „International Monetary Fund Working Paper” 2002, t. 208(2).
  • Heppke-Falk, K.H., Tenhofen, J., Wolff, G.B., The macroeconomic effects of exogenous fiscal policy shocks in Germany: A disaggregated SVAR analysis, „Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, Economic Studies” 2006, nr 41.
  • Hjelm, G., Effects of Fiscal Contractions: The importance of preceding exchange rate movements, „The Scandinavian Journal of Economics” 2002, t. 104, nr 3.
  • International Monetary Fund, Will it hurt? Macroeconomic effects of fiscal consolidation, „World Economic Outlook: Recovery, Risk, and Rebalancing” October 2010.
  • Jordà, Ò., Taylor, A.M., The Time for Austerity: Estimating the Average Treatment Effect of Fiscal Policy, „NBER Working Paper” 2013, nr 19414.
  • Kandil, M., Morsy, H., Fiscal stimulus and credibility in emerging countries, „IMF Working Paper” 2010, nr 123(10).
  • Lambertini, L., Tavares, J.A., Exchange rates and fiscal adjustments: Evidence from the OECD and implications for the EMU, „Contributions in Macroeconomics” 2005, t. 5, nr 1.
  • Mirdala, R., Effects of fiscal policy shocks in the European transition economies, „MPRAPaper” 2009, nr 19481.
  • Owsiak, S., Niekeynesowskie podejście do gospodarki i finansów publicznych, „Studia Ekonomiczne” 2016, nr 294.
  • Perotti, R., Estimating the effects of fiscal policy in OECD countries, „IGIER Working Paper” 2004, nr 276.
  • Redo, M., An analysis of economic changes in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe belonging to the European Union in the years 2003–2014, „Torun International Studies” 2015a, t. 1, nr 8, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2015.008.
  • Redo, M., Bezpieczeństwo finansów publicznych – wpływ ekspansji fiskalnej na poziom kosztu kapitału w Polsce na tle państw Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej [w:] Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne państwa. Uwarunkowania, procesy, skutki, red. A. Jackiewicz, A. Trzaskowska-Dmoch, CeDeWu, Warszawa 2017.
  • Redo, M., Istota i znaczenie oficjalnych aktywów rezerwowych w gospodarkach rozwijających się, „Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej we Wrocławiu” 2013, nr 37(5).
  • Redo, M., The analysis of the amount and structure of foreign exchange reserves in Poland in the years 1998–2014, „Law and Administration in Post-Soviet Europe” 2015b, t. 2, doi: 10.1515/lape-2015-0004.
  • Redo, M., Siemiątkowski, P., Zewnętrzne bezpieczeństwo finansowe państwa, UMK w Toruniu, 2017, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2017.100.
  • Romer, C.D., Romer, D.H., The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks, „NBER Working Paper” 2007, nr 13264.
  • Rzońca, A., Ciżkowicz, P., Non-keynesian effects of fiscal contraction in new member states, „European Central Bank Working Paper” 2005, nr 519.
  • Siwińska-Gorzelak, J., Dług publiczny a cykliczność polityki fiskalnej, „Bank i Kredyt” 2015, nr 46(1).
  • von Hagen, J., Strauch, R., Fiscal consolidations: Quality, economic conditions, and success, „Public Choice” 2001, t. 109, nr 3, doi:10.1023/A:1013073005104.
  • Dane statystyczne Eurostat, Real GDP growth rate – volume. Percentage change on previous year, 2001–2015 (data dostępu 16.10.2016).
  • Eurostat, Total general government expenditure – Percentage of GDP, 2001–2015 (data dostępu 16.10.2016).
  • Eurostat, Total general government revenue – Percentage of GDP, 2001–2015 (data dostępu 16.10.2016).
  • GUS, Kwartalne wskaźniki makroekonomiczne, II kwartał 2006 – III kwartał 2016 (data dostępu 6.12.2016).
  • GUS, Roczne wskaźniki makroekonomiczne, 2000–2015 (data dostępu 15.11.2016).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.mhp-9a8e7238-a4af-43e4-bcb3-1437e953fa0b
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.