Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 15 - Przywództwo polityczne w Polsce i na świecie | 49-76

Article title

Przywództwo polityczne jako wynik wzajemnej relacji między przywódcą a jego zwolennikami

Content

Title variants

EN
Political leadership as a result of the interaction between the leader and his followers

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Considers presented in this article fall under the topic of perspectives of relational leadership. Exploration of the specific mechanism in the construction of the relationships between the political leaders and their followers have been the subject of psychological needs. Complementary to those needs can be the foundation of coherent relations between the leader and his followers. Coherent relationships can also provide the similarity principle which is most frequently mentioned among the many reasons to establish inter-personal relationships. The authors principle in the article is referred to as the cognitive similarities of a leader and his followers. These considerations are preceded by an analysis of a specific type of relationship between a leader and his followers called a charismatic leadership. In this case charisma is not seen as the feature of a single leader, but as a product of the social perception of a larger group of people.

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

References

  • Ambady N., Bernieri F. J., Richeson J., Toward a Histology of Social Behavior: Judgmental Accuracy from Thin Slices of the Behavioral Stream, "Advances in experimental social psychology" 2000, No 32.
  • Ambady N., Rosenthal R., Thin Slices of Expressive Behavior as Predictors of Interpersonal Consequences: A Meta-Analysis, „Psychological Bulletin” 1992, No. 111(2).
  • Aronson E., Wilson T. D., Akert R. M., Psychologia społeczna. Serce i umysł, Poznań 1997.
  • Bar M., Neta M., Linz H., Very First Impressions, „Emotion” 2006, Vol. 6.
  • Benard E., Neltner W., Paciorkowski B., The Effect of Similarity of Personality Traits between Political Candidates and Voters on Liking of Candidate.
  • Berry D.S., Taking People at Face Value: Evidence for the Kernal of Truth Hypothesis, „Social Cognition” 1990, No. 8(4).
  • Brower H.H., Schoorman F.D., Tan H.H., A Model of Relational Leadership: The Integration of Trust and Leader-Member Exchange, „The Leadership Quarterly” 2000, No. 11 (2).
  • Brunswik E., Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments, Berkeley C.A. 1956.
  • Buss D.M., Human Mate Selection, „American Scientist”, 1985, No. 73(I-II).
  • Byrne D., Nelson D., Attraction as a Linear Function of Positive Reinforcement, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 1965, No. 1.
  • Brzozowski P., Skala wartości (SW). Polska adaptacja Value Survey M. Rokeacha, Warszawa 1990.
  • Caprara G.V., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C., Fraley R.Ch., When Likeness Goes with Liking: the Case of Political Preferences, „Political Psychology” 2007, Vol. 28, Issue 5.
  • Caprara G.V., Vecchione M., Barbaranelli C., Fraley C., When Parsimony Subdues Distinctiveness: Simplified Public Perceptions of Politicians' Personality, „Political Psychology” 2002, No. 23.
  • Caprara G.V., Zimbardo P., Personalizing Politics, „American Psychologist” 2004, No. 59(7).
  • Caprara G.V., Barbaranelli C., Consiglio C., Picconi L., Zimbardo P., Personalities of Politicians and Voters: Unique and Synergistic Relationships, „Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” 2003, No. 84.
  • Costa P.T., McCrae R.R., Osobowość dorosłego człowieka. Perspektywa teorii pięcioczynnikowej, Kraków 2005.
  • Dachler H.P., Hosking D.M., The Primacy of Relations in Socially Constructing Organizational Realities, w: Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism, ed. by D.M. Hosking, H.P. Dachler, K.J. Gergen, Aldershot 1995.
  • Drath W., The Deep Blue Sea: Rethinking the Source of Leadership, San Francisco 2001.
  • Elms E., Personality in Politics, New York 1976.
  • Funder D. C., Errors and Mistakes: Evaluating the Accuracy of Social Judgment, „Psychological Bulletin” 1987, No. 101(1).
  • Fromm E., Ucieczka od wolności, przeł. O. i A. Zimilscy, Warszawa 2008.
  • Graen G.B., Scandura T., Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing, w: Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 9, ed. by B.M. Staw, L.L. Cummings, Greenwich, CT 1987
  • Graen G., Uhl-Bien M., The Transformation of Professionals into Self-managing and Partially Self-designing Contributors: Toward a Theory of Leadership-making, „Journal of Management Systems” 1991, No. 3 (3).
  • Heider F., The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York 1958.
  • Hollander E.P., Leadership Dynamics: A Practical Guide to Effective Relationships, New York 1978.
  • Iyer R., Graham J., Koleva S., Ditto P., Haidt J., Beyond Identity Politics: Moral Psychology and the 2008 Democratic Primary, „Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy” 2010, No. 10(1).
  • Jakubowska U., Politycy oraz cechy mentalności społeczno-politycznej ich zwolenników, w: Potoczne wyobrażenia o demokracji. Psychologiczne uwarunkowania i konsekwencje, pod red. J. Reykowskiego, Warszawa 1996.
  • Jakubowska U., Przywództwo polityczne, w: Podstawy psychologii politycznej, pod red. K. Skarżyńskiej, Poznań 2002.
  • Jermier J.M., Introduction: Charismatic Leadership: Neo-Weberian Perspectives, „Leadership Quarterly” 1993, No. 4.
  • Karwat M., Charyzma i pseudocharyzma, w: Przywództwo polityczne, pod red. T. Bodio, „Studia Politologiczne”, Vol. 5, Warszawa 2001.
  • Katz D., Patterns of Leadership, w: Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. by J.N. Knutson London 1973.
  • Katz D., Kahn R.L., The Social Psychology of Organization, New York 1978.
  • Klein J.M., House R.J., On Fire: Charismatic Leadership and Levels of Analyses, „Leadership Quarterly” 1995, No. 6.
  • Kozielecki J., Potrzeba hubrystyczna a działanie transgresyjne, „Przegląd Psychologiczny” 1984, Vol. XXVII/2.
  • Lord R.G., Brown D.J., Freiberg S.J., Understanding the Dynamics of Leadership: The Role of Follower Self-concepts in the Leader/follower Relationship, „Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proces¬ses” 1999, No. 78.
  • Maslow A.H., Motywacja i osobowość, Warszawa 1990.
  • Maslow A.H., Teoria hierarchii potrzeb, w: Problemy osobowości i motywacji w psychologii amerykańskiej, pod red. J. Reykowskiego, Warszawa 1964.
  • Maslow A.H., W stronę psychologii istnienia, Warszawa 1986.
  • Murrell K.L., Emergent Theories of Leadership for the Next Century: To¬wards Relational Concepts, „Organization Development Journal” 1997, No. 15 (3).
  • Newcomb T., The Acquaintance Process, New York 1961.
  • Pervin L.A., Psychologia osobowości, Gdańsk 2002.
  • Pilch I., Makiawelizm jako osobowościowy predykator zachowań wyborczych, „Preferencje Polityczne” 2011, nr 2.
  • Pilch I., Wartości podstawowe a preferencje ideologiczne i decyzje wyborcze w wyborach do sejmu 2011, „Preferencje Polityczne” 2012, nr 3.
  • Post J.M., Narcissism and the Charismatic Leader-follower Relationship, „Political Psychology” 1986, No. 4.
  • Post J.M., Narcissism and the Charismatic Leader-Follower Relationship, w: Leaders and Their Followers in a Dangerous World: The Psychology of Political Behavior, ed. by J.M. Post, A. George, New York 2004.
  • Rokeach M., The Nature of Human Values, New York 1973.
  • Rokeach M., The Two-value Model of Political Ideology and British Politics, „British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology” 1979, No. 18.
  • Siegel A.M., Heinz Kohut and the Psychology of the Self, New York 1996.
  • Skarżyńska K., Młode elity polityczne: charakterystyka psychologiczna, „Studia Psychologiczne” 1996, nr 2.
  • Skarżyńska K., Podobieństwo poglądów czy osobowość kandydata na prezydenta: motywy decyzji wyborczych najmłodszych wyborców, „Kultura i Społeczeństwo” 1997, nr 4.
  • Spinrad W., Charisma: A Blighted Concept and an Alternative Formula, „Political Science Quarterly” 1991, No. 106, 2.
  • Stogdill R.M., Coons A.E., Leader Behavior: Its Description and Measurement, Columbus 1957.
  • Stone W., The Psychology of Politics, London 1974.
  • Strelau J., D. Doliński, Psychologia. Podręcznik akademicki, Gdańsk 2008
  • Tomaszewski T., Podstawowe formy organizacji i regulacji zachowania, w: Psychologia, pod red. T. Tomaszewskiego, Warszawa 1975.
  • Turska-Kawa A., Poczucie alienacji a użytkowanie mediów. W poszukiwaniu nowych obszarów zastosowania teorii użytkowania i gratyfikacji, Katowice 2011.
  • Turska-Kawa A., Profile psychologiczne kandydatów na Prezydenta RP, w: Wybory prezydenckie 2010, pod red. J. Okrzesika, W. Wojtasika, Katowice 2011.
  • Uhl-Bien M., Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the Social Processes of Leadership and Organizing, „Leadership Quarterly” 1996, Vol. 17, Issue 6.
  • Uhl-Bien M., Graen G., Scandura T., Implications of Leader-member Exchange (LMX) for Strategic Human Resource Management Systems: Relationships as Social Capital for Competitive Advantage, w: Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, Vol. 18, ed. by G.R. Ferris, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 2000.
  • Wilner A.R., The Spellbinders: Charismatic Political Leadership, New Heaven 1984.
  • Wojciszke B., Człowiek wśród ludzi. Zarys psychologii społecznej, Warszawa 2002.
  • Wojtasik W., Sukces Ruchu Palikota w świetle czynników możliwego sukcesu politycznego (Political Opportunity Structure), „Preferencje Polityczne” 2012, nr 3.
  • Worsley P., The Trumpet Shall Sound: A Study of “Cargo” Cults in Melanisia, New York 1968.
  • Vecchione M., Gonzalez Castro J.L., Caprara G.V., Voters and leaders in the mirror of politics: similarity in personality and voting choice in Italy and Spain, „International Journal of Psychology” 2011, Vol. 46, No. 4.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.mhp-a7466a95-4ff6-487c-be07-a278f1167686
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.