2018 | Volume 14 | Issue 3 | 570-586
Article title

Corruption awareness and ethical decision making in Indonesia

Title variants
Languages of publication
In countries with high susceptibility to corruption, internal government auditors play an important role in combating and mitigating the corruption problem. Since corruption is unethical behavior, government internal auditors must have ethical standards if they are to be effective. Research surrounding the processes of ethical decision making has had mixed outcomes. This article examines the effect of corruption awareness in Indonesian society as a whole, and Indonesian organizations in general. Ethical intensity issues are examined, as are the organizational factors that impact on ethical decision-making. Results are mediated by ethical sensitivity and professional skepticism, with the theoretical framework of ethical decision-making being supported. Additional analysis examining the effect of gender, education level and experience on ethical decision-making process is provided.
Physical description
  • Faculty of Economics and Business, Muria Kudus University, Indonesia
  • La Trobe Business School, La Trobe University, Australia
  • La Trobe Business School, La Trobe University, Australia
  • AICPA (1997a). Due care in the performance of work. Statement on auditing standards No. 1. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. New York: AICPA.
  • AICPA (1997b). Statement of auditing standards No. 82: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. New York: AICPA.
  • AICPA (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statement on auditing standards No.99. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. New York: AICPA.
  • AICPA (2006). Understanding the entity and its environment and assessing the risks of material misstatement. Statement on auditing standards No. 109. New York: AICPA.
  • Al-Kazemi Ali A., & Zajaz G. (1999). Ethics sensitivity and awareness within organizations in Kuwait: An empirical exploration of espoused theory and theory-in-use. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(40), 353-361.
  • Bernardi, R. A., & D. F. Arnold, Sr. (1997). An examination of moral development within public accounting by gender, staff level, and firm. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(4), 653-668.
  • Bowman, D., & Gilligan G. (2007). Public awareness of corruption in Australia. Journal of Financial Crime, 14(4), 438-452.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, Application, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
  • Chia A. & Mee, L.S. (2000). The effect of issue characteristics on recognition of moral issues. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 255-269.
  • Choi, Do L., & Perry, J. L. (2010). Developing a tool to measure ethical sensitivity in public administration and its application. International Review of Public Administration, 14(3), 1-12
  • Chou, C. O., Bentler P. M., & Satora, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard error for non-normal data in the covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo case study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347-357.
  • Corless, J. C. (2009). Fraud awareness of internal auditor. The Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 4(2), 93-109.
  • Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants' ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101-121.
  • Dickerson, C. (2009). Ethical decision making in public accounting: Investigating factors that influence auditor ethical sensitivity. Dissertation Submitted to Faculty of Education Claremont Graduate University.
  • Dye, K. M. (2007). Corruption and fraud detection by public sector auditors. EDPACS, 36(5/6), 6-15.
  • Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.
  • Fernandes, J. J. (1994). Preparing tomorrow's internal auditor. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(2), 20-23.
  • Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2011). Business ethics: Ethical decision making & Cases, 8th Edition, South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Ferrell, O. C., & Weaver K. M. (1978). Ethical beliefs of marketing managers. Journal of Marketing, 42(2) 69-73.
  • Friedberg, A. (1998). Ethical aspects of internal auditing. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(8), 895-905.
  • Friestad, M. R., & Wright, P. (1999). Everyday persuasion knowledge. Psychology and Marketing, 16(2), 185-194.
  • Fritzsche, D. J., & Oz, E. (2007). Personal values influence on the ethical dimension of decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 335-343.
  • Harris, J., & C. Sutton (1995). Unravelling the ethical decision-making process: Clues from an empirical study comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 805-817.
  • Heaston, P. H, Cooper, R. W., & Frank, G. L. (1993). The ethical environment of the internal auditor. The Internal Auditor, 50(3), 18-24.
  • Hill, N., Stevenson, K., & Clarke, P. (1998). Factors that affect ethical reasoning abilities of US and Irish small firms accounting practitioners. Research on Accounting Ethics, 4, 145-166.
  • Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?. Psychology Bulletin, 112, 351-362.
  • Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Business of Macromarketing, 6, 5-16.
  • Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149-171.
  • Hookway, C. (1990). Skepticism. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • IFAC (2004). The auditor's responsibility to consider fraud in an audit of financial statements. International Federation of Accountant. ISA No 240.
  • James, W., & McManus, L. (2011). An empirical study of the influence of mentors and organizational climate on the ethical attitudes and decision-making of national female business graduates in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Business Ethics Education, 8, 31-54.
  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366-396.
  • Jones, J., Massey, D. W., & Thorne, L. (2003). Auditors' ethical reasoning: insight from past research and implication for the future. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 45-103.
  • Kantor, J. & Weisberg, J. (2002). Ethical attitudes and ethical behavior: are managers role models? International Journal of Manpower, 23(8), 687-707.
  • Kerler, W. A. & Killough, L. N. (2009). The effects of satisfaction with a client's management during a prior audit engagement, trust, and moral reasoning on auditors' perceived risk of management fraud. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, 109-136.
  • Klitgaard, R. (1998). International cooperation against corruption. IMF/World Bank, Finance and Development, 35(1), 3.
  • Knapp, C. A., & Knapp, M. C. (2001). The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 25-37.
  • Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives the classification of educational goals. Handbook II. Affective domain. London: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.
  • Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In Lickona, T., Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues. Holt, NY: Rinehart and Winston.
  • Kompas (2011). Indonesia Peringkat ke 100, Indeks Korupsi Indonesia [Indonesia Ranking to 100, Indonesia Corruption Index]. Retrieved May 14, 2018, from [In Indonesian].
  • Lam, K., & Shi, G. (2007). Factors affecting ethical attitudes in Mainland China and Hong Kong. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 463-479.
  • Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R. A., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate is and what it should be: The role of gender, academic status and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 205-217.
  • Mautz, R. K., & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The philosophy of auditing. American Accounting Association. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
  • McDevitt, R., Giapponi, C., & C. Tromley (2007). A model of ethical decision making: The integration of process and content. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 219-229.
  • Myint U. (2000). Corruption: Causes, consequences and cures. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 7(2), 33-58.
  • Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1-34.
  • Newstrom, J. M., & Ruth, W. A. (1975). The ethics of management and the management of ethics, MSU Business Topics, 23(Winter 1975), 29-37.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Owhoso, V. D. (2002). Mitigating gender-specific superior ethical sensitivity when assessing likelihood of fraud risk. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14(3), 360-374.
  • Paolillo, J. G. P., & Vitell, S. J. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(1), 65-75.
  • PCAOB (2007). An audit of internal control over financial reporting that is integrated with an audit of financial statements. PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 5. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.
  • PCAOB (2008). Proposed auditing standards related to the auditor's assessment of and response to risk. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). Retrieved May 15, 2018, from
  • Rest, J. R. (1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
  • Rest J. R. (1986). Moral development: advances in research and theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Rose, J. M. (2007). Attention to evidence of aggressive financial reporting and intentional misstatement judgments: effect of experience and trust. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19, 215-229.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Roxas, M. L., & Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 149-165.
  • Shaub, M. K. (1989). An empirical examination of the determinants of auditor ethical sensitivity. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Texas Tech University.
  • Shaub, M. K., Finn, D. W., & Munter, P. (1993). The effects of auditors’ ethical orientation on commitment and ethical sensitivity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 5, 145-169.
  • Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. (1996). Ethics, experience and professional skepticism: A situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8(Supplement), 124-157.
  • Siegel, P. H., & Miller, J. R. (2010). An international comparison of social interaction attributes of internal auditors: an analysis using the firo-B. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 14(1), 83-98.
  • Sweeney, J. (1995). The ethical expertise of accountants: An exploratory analysis. Research on Accounting Ethics, 1, 213-234.
  • Transparency International (2016). Retrieved December 15, 2017, from
  • Valentine, S., & Page, K. (2006). Nine to Five: Skepticism of Women's Employment and Ethical Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 63, 53-61.
  • Wilks T. J., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors' sensitivity to fraud-cues. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(3), 719-745.
  • Wimbush, J. C., & Shepard, J. M. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 637-647
  • Wimbush, J. C., Shepard, J. M, & Markham, S. E. (1997). An empirical examination of the relationship between ethical climate on ethical behavior from multiple level analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(16), 1705-1716.
  • Wright, M. (1995). Can moral judgement and ethical behavior be learned?. Management Decision, 33(10), 17-29.
  • Yetmar, S. A., & Eastman K. K. (2000). Tax practitioner' ethical sensitivity: a model and empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 271-288.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.