Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2021 | 10 | 1-22

Article title

Studying the Post-Socialist City in Yugoslavia: An Examination of Multi-Disciplinary Methodologies and Theoretical Approaches

Authors

Content

Title variants

PL
Badanie przestrzeni miasta postsocjalistycznego na obszarze byłej Jugosławii: analiza wielodyscyplinowych metodologii i perspektyw teoretycznych

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Od upadku ładu komunistycznego w Europie na początku lat 90. XX wieku, czemu towarzyszył rozpad Jugosławii i wojna, która naznaczyła ostatnią dekadę minionego stulecia na Bałkanach, intensywnie rozwijają się badania naukowe poświęcone Europie Południowo-Wschodniej. Od początku nowego tysiąclecia pojawiają się projekty akademickie dotyczące dwudziestowiecznej architektury, zaś nowe pokolenie historyków architektury i urbanistyki z rosnącym zainteresowaniem rozwija poruszaną dotąd tematykę. Jednakże badania nad architekturą okresu postsocjalistycznego w miastach zachodnich Bałkanów odgrywają drugorzędną rolę w porównaniu z aktywnością naukową poświęconą architekturze modernizmu w Jugosławii, jak też miejscu architektury w przemianach społeczno-politycznych podczas zimnej wojny. Badania przestrzeni miejskiej w okresie postsocjalistycznym zajmują marginalne miejsce w dyskursie historii architektury i urbanistyki, zaś projekty naukowe o tej tematyce rozwijają się głównie w perspektywie socjologii, antropologii społecznej i geografii miasta. Celem artykułu jest analiza dotychczasowej literatury dotyczącej architektury postsocjalistycznej oraz miejskiego, ideologicznego i socjologicznego dziedzictwa socjalistycznej Jugosławii; przedstawione przeze mnie prace starają się również określić możliwe kierunki dalszych studiów nad tą problematyką. Uważam, że analiza wielodyscyplinowych badań naukowych dotyczących architektury socjalizmu i okresu post-socjalistycznego może być kluczowym krokiem w procesie odkrywania znaczeń jugosłowiańskiej i postjugosłowiańskiej przestrzeni miejskiej, jak też w próbach scharakteryzowania jej specyfiki. Pod względem metodologicznym artykuł rekonstruuje sposoby badania typowe dla poszczególnych dyscyplin oraz ich punkty wspólne, jak też dokonuje analizy istniejącego już dyskursu naukowego. Ponadto dzięki badaniu różnorodnych perspektyw metodologicznych i teoretycznych w studiach na temat miast Europy Środkowej w artykule zaproponowano możliwe kierunki dalszych prac badawczych nad architekturą i urbanistyką okresu postsocjalistycznego w krajach byłej Jugosławii.
EN
Since the end of the state-socialist era in the early 1990s – and effectively, since the end of the Yugoslav federation and the subsequent wars that had engulfed the Western Balkans for almost a decade – the study of the twentieth-century South-Eastern Europe has intensified. The scholarship on the region’s twentieth-century architecture has been prolific since the early years of the new millennium, and the new generation of urban and architectural scholars has further amplified this trend. However, an inquiry into the post-socialist city in Western Balkans has been relegated largely to the secondary position to the study of the Yugoslav modernist architecture and its role within the socio-political mechanisms of the Cold War era. In this discourse, the study of the post-socialist urban space remains lacking in architectural and urban history – it is mainly conducted within the methodological and theoretical frameworks of sociology, socio-cultural anthropology, and urban geography. To bridge this scholarly gap and identify possible new trajectories of inquiry, I probe into the different scholarship dealing with the post-socialist city and the urban, ideological, and social remnants of the state-socialist era in former Yugoslavia. I argue that the study of the multi-disciplinary nature of the scholarship examining the state-socialist and post-socialist city serves as a vital step in the more comprehensive understanding of the (post-)Yugoslav architectural space, its particulars, and idiosyncrasies. Methodologically, I identify and outline the different disciplinary strands in the study of the post-socialist space in general, and post-Yugoslav space in particular, followed by an analysis of the established discourses and their points of interference and overlap. By investigating qualitative methodologies and different theoretical approaches in the study of the Central-East European and Yugoslav post-socialist city, I explore the post-socialist urban space in former Yugoslavia in a wide-ranging manner, ultimately identifying conduits for future research.

Year

Issue

10

Pages

1-22

Physical description

Dates

published
2021

Contributors

author
  • Univerzita Karlova [Charles University], Prague

References

  • Alić, D., & Gusheh, M. (1999). Reconciling national narratives in socialist Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Baščaršija Project, 1948–1953. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 58(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/991434
  • Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., & Szelenyi, I. (Eds.). (1996). Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712733
  • Bartmanski, D. (2011). Successful icons of failed time: Rethinking post-communist nostalgia. Acta Sociologica, 54(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699311412625
  • Blagojević, Lj. (2007). Novi Beograd: Osporeni modernizam. Zavod za udžbenike.
  • Cavrić, B., Toplek, S., & Šiljeg, A. (2008). Participatory measurements of sustainable urban development and quality of life in post-socialist Zadar, Croatia. Spatium, 2008(17–18), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT0818045C
  • Czaplicka, J. J., Gelazis, N., & Ruble, B. A. (Eds.). (2009). Cities after the fall of communism: Reshaping cultural landscapes and European identity. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Davenport, B. (2015). ‘A heritage of resistance’ – The changing meanings of Belgrade’s Generalstab. In M. L. Stig Sorensen & D. Viejo-Rose (Eds.), War and cultural heritage: Biographies of place (pp. 156–183). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107444911.007
  • Enyedi, G. (1996). Urbanization under socialism. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelenyi (Eds.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 100–118). Blackwell Publishing. https:// doi.org/10.1002/9780470712733.ch4
  • Ferenčuhová, S., & Gentile, M. (2016). Introduction: Post-socialist cities and urban theory. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4–5), 483–496. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15387216.2016.1270615
  • Graan, A. (2013). Counterfeiting the nation? Skopje 2014 and the politics of nation branding in Macedonia. Cultural Anthropology, 28(1), 161–179. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01179.x
  • Gunzburger Makaš, E. (2005). Interpreting multivalent sites: New meanings for Mostar’s Old Bridge. Centropa, 5(1), 59–69.
  • Harloe, M. (1996). Cities in the transition. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelenyi (Eds.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 1–29). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470712733.ch1
  • Häußermann, H. (1996). From the socialist to the capitalist city: Experiences from Germany. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelenyi (Eds.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 214–231). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470712733.ch7
  • Heider, B. (2019). What drives urban population growth and shrinkage in postsocialist East Germany? Growth and Change, 2019(50), 1460–1486. https://doi. org/10.1111/grow.12337
  • Heřmanová, M., & Lehečka, M. (2019). Arrival city: Invisible diversity at Prague’s housing estates. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 2019(2), 58–67. https:// verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_public_det&id=564224
  • Herscher, A. (2010). Violence taking place: The architecture of the Kosovo conflict. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804776226
  • Hirt, S., Ferenčuhová, S., & Tuvikene, T. (2017). Conceptual forum: The ‘post-socialist’ city. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4–5), 497–520. https:// doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2016.1271345
  • Horvatinčić, S. (2020). Between memory politics and new models of heritage management: Rebuilding Yugoslav memorial sites ‘from below’. ICOMOS-Hefte des Deutschen Nationalkomitees, 73, 108–115. https://www.bib.irb.hr/1060871
  • Jansen, S. (2005). Who’s afraid of white socks? Towards a critical understanding of post-Yugoslav urban self-perceptions. Ethnologia Balkanica, 2005(9), 151– 167. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=145840
  • Jovanović, M., & Ratkaj, I. (2014). Functional metamorphosis of New Belgrade. disP – The Planning Review, 50(4), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.201 4.1007653
  • Kazimierczak, J., & Szafrańska, E. (2019). Demographic and morphological shrinkage of urban neighbourhoods in a post-socialist city: The case of Łódź, Poland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B. Human Geography, 101(2), 138–163. https://doi. org/10.1080/04353684.2019.1582304
  • Kirn, G. (2014). Transnationalism in reverse: From Yugoslav to post-Yugoslav memorial sites. In C. De Cesari & A. Rigney (Eds.), Transnational memories (pp. 313–338). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110359107.313
  • Kristiánová, K. (2016). Post-socialist transformations of green open spaces in large scale socialist housing estates in Slovakia. Procedia Engineering, 161, 1863–1867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.715
  • Kulić, V., Mrduljaš, M., & Thaler, W. (2012). Modernism in-between: The mediatory architectures of socialist Yugoslavia. Jovis.
  • Le Normand, B. (2014). Designing Tito’s capital: Urban planning, modernism, and socialism in Belgrade. The University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctt7zwb9j
  • Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2010). The future of housing systems after the transition – The case of the Czech Republic. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 43(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.04.001
  • Marcińczak, S., Gentile, M., & Stępniak, M. (2013). Paradoxes of (post)socialist segregation: Metropolitan sociospatial divisions under socialism and after in Poland. Urban Geography, 34(3), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638. 2013.778667
  • Marcuse, P. (1996). Privatization and its discontents: Property rights in land and housing in the transition in Eastern Europe. In G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, & I. Szelenyi (Eds.), Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 119–191). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1002/9780470712733.ch5
  • Martín-Díaz, J. (2014). Urban restructuring in post-war contexts: The case of Sarajevo. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 63(3), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.15201/ hungeobull.63.3.5
  • Mattioli, F. (2014). Unchanging boundaries: The reconstruction of Skopje and the politics of heritage. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(6), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2013.818569
  • Molnar, V. (2010). The cultural production of locality: Reclaiming the ‘European city’ in post-wall Berlin. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(2), 281–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00894.x
  • Mrduljaš, M., & Kulić, V. (Eds.). (2012). Unfinished modernisations: Between utopia and pragmatism. UHA/CCA.
  • Ouředníček, M. (2016). The relevance of “Western” theoretical concepts for inves-tigations of the margins of post-socialist cities: The case of Prague. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57(4–5), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/153872 16.2016.1256786
  • Petrović, B. (2016). The Haussmannian Paris and the neoclassical Skopje (The Skopje 2014 Project). Belgrade Journal of Media and Communications, 2016(9), 23–33. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=470374
  • Petrović, M. (2001). Post-socialist housing policy transformation in Yugoslavia and Belgrade. European Journal of Housing Policy, 1(2), 211–231. https://doi. org/10.1080/14616710110083434
  • Radović Mahečić, D. (2015). The case of Dubrovnik: UNESCO World Heritage Site under siege, 1991–92. In J. M. Mancini & K. Bresnahan (Eds.), Architecture and armed conflict: The politics of destruction (pp. 27–43). Routledge.
  • Shaw, M. (2004). Urbicide in Bosnia. In S. Graham (Ed.), Cities, war and terrorism: Towards an urban geopolitics (pp. 154–172). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Stanilov, K. (Ed.). (2007). The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism. Springer. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6053-3
  • Štiks, I. (2015). ‘New left’ in the post-Yugoslav space: Issues, sites, and forms. Socialism and Democracy, 29(3), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2015.1089094
  • Štraus, I. (1991). Arhitektura Jugoslavije 1945–1990. Svjetlost.
  • Svirčić Gotovac, A., & Kerbler, B. (2019). From post-socialist to sustainable: The City of Ljubljana. Sustainability, 11(24), Article 7126. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su11247126
  • Temelová, J., Novák, J., Ouředníček, M., & Puldová, P. (2011). Housing estates in the Czech Republic after socialism: Various trajectories and inner differentiation. Urban Studies, 48(9), 1811–1834. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010379279
  • Vujovic, S. (2000). An uneasy view of the city. In N. Popov (Ed.), The road to war in Serbia: Trauma and catharsis (pp. 123–146). Central European University Press.
  • Walasek, H. (2015). (Ed.). Bosnia and the destruction of cultural heritage. Ashgate. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315569789
  • Waley, P. (2011). From modernist to market urbanism: The transformation of New Belgrade. Planning Perspectives, 26(2), 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/026654 33.2011.550444
  • Young, C., & Kaczmarek, S. (2008). The socialist past and postsocialist urban identity in Central and Eastern Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 15(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776407081275
  • Zarecor, K. (2018). What was so socialist about the socialist city? Second World urbanity in Europe. Journal of Urban History, 44(1), 95–117. https://doi. org/10.1177/0096144217710229
  • Zarecor, K., & Špačková, E. (2012). Czech paneláks are disappearing, but the housing estates remain. Architektúra & Urbanizmus, 2012(3–4), 288–301. https://www. ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=229958

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
31339668

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_11649_ch_2606
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.