Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 12 | 1-19

Article title

Holocaust Oral History Sources in the Yahad-In Unum Archive Collection (Based on Volhynia-Podolia General District Materials)

Content

Title variants

PL
Źródła historii mówionej o Holokauście w kolekcji Archiwum „Yahad-In Unum” (na przykładzie Okręgu Generalnego „Wołyń-Podole”)

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza zbioru źródeł historii mówionej o Holokauście z terenów okupowanych przez hitlerowców Okręgu Generalnego „Wołyń-Podole”, Komisariatu Rzeszy Ukraina, opublikowanych przez „Yahad-In Unum”, instytucję naukową znajdującą się w Paryżu, we Francji. Metodologia badań opiera się na zasadach historyzmu. Po raz pierwszy w historiografii przeanalizowano źródła historii mówionej o Holokauście, znajdujące się w „Yahad-In Unum”, zebrane z terytorium Okręgu Generalnego „Wołyń-Podole”. We Wnioskach wyjaśniono, że źródła historii mówionej „Yahad-In Unum” mają ogromny potencjał do badań nad Holokaustem. Posiadają wyjątkowe informacje, których nie można znaleźć w innych źródłach. Dokumenty niemieckie oraz sowieckie nie mogą w pełni określić procesu Holokaustu. Natomiast relacje świadków dają możliwości wszechstronnego wyjaśnienia tego tematu.
EN
The purpose of the article is to analyze the oral history collection of the Holocaust sources at the Yahad-In Unum scientific institution (Paris, France) on the example of the Nazi-occupied territories of the Volhynia-Podolia General District of Reichskommissariat Ukraine. The research methodology is based on the principles of historicism and scientific objectivity. Analysis of oral history sources is the main method of the research. Scientific novelty: For the first time in historiography, the oral history Holocaust sources of the Yahad-In Unum scientific institution were analyzed based on the example of the Volhynia-Podolia General District. The conclusions prove that the oral history sources of Yahad-In Unum have powerful potential for Holocaust studies. They have exclusive information that is not found in other sources. German and Soviet documents cannot fully shed light on Holocaust history. Instead, the stories of witnesses provide an opportunity to examine this topic in a multifaceted way. 

Year

Issue

12

Pages

1-19

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Рівненський державний гуманітарний університет [Rivne State University of Humanities], Rivne

References

  • Bodnar, H. (2021). “S’ohodni istoriia tvoryt’sia v Ukraїni”: Usna istoriia i dosvidy nezavershenykh revoliutsiї ta viĭny: Mirkuvannia pro dyskusiĭne i (ne)ochevydne. In H. Hrinchenko (Ed.), Slukhaty, chuty, rozumity: Usna istoriia Ukraїny ХХ–ХХІ stolit’ (pp. 31–57). TOV “Art-knyha”.
  • Dean, M. (Ed.). (2012). Encyclopedia of camps and ghettos, 1933–1945: Vol. 2. Ghettos in German-Occupied Eastern Europe. Indiana University Press.
  • Demant, F. (2019). The many shades of bystanding on social dilemmas and passive participation. In C. Morina & K. Thijs (Eds.), Probing the limits of categorization: The bystander in Holocaust history (pp. 90–106). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.9
  • Debua, P. (2011). Khranytel’ spohadiv: Kryvavymy slidamy Holokostu (V. Kadenko, Trans.). Dukh i Litera.
  • Desbois, P. (2013). The witnesses of Ukraine or evidence from the ground: The research of Yahad- In Unum. In The Holocaust in Ukraine: New sources and perspectives: Conference presentation (pp. 91–99). Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
  • Desbois, P. (2018). In broad daylight: The secret procedures behind the Holocaust by bullets. Arcade Publishing.
  • Ensel, R., & Gans, E. (2019). The Dutch bystander as non-Jew and implicated subject. In C. Morina & K. Thijs (Eds.), Probing the limits of categorization: The bystander in Holocaust history (pp. 107–127). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.10
  • Fulbrook, M. (2019). Bystanders: Catchall concept, alluring alibi, or crucial clue? In C. Morina & K. Thijs (Eds.), Probing the limits of categorization: The bystander in Holocaust history (pp. 15–35). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.5
  • Hrinchenko, H. (2007). Usna istoriia: Metodychni rekomendatsii z orhanizatsii doslidzhennia: Dlia studentiv i aspirantiv. Kharkivs’kyĭ natsional’nyĭ universytet imeni V. N. Karazina.
  • Hrinchenko, H., Rebrova, I., & Romanova, I. (2012). Usna istoriia v postradians’kykh doslidnyts’kykh praktykakh (na prykladi suchasnykh Bilorusiї, Rosiї ta Ukraїny). Ukraїns’kyĭ istorychnyĭ zhurnal, 2012(4), 172–187.
  • Kaparulin, Y. (2020). The Holocaust in Southern Ukraine: The response of survived Jews of Kalinindorf district after the German occupation. Colloquia Humanistica, 9, 153–180. https://doi.org/10.11649/ch.2020.011
  • Khoptiar, A. (2020). Holokost u Kamianets’-Podil’skiĭ oblasti: Khronolohiia, mekhanizmy, metody vynyshchennia ievreĭskoho naselennia (lypen’ 1941 – sichen’ 1943 rr.). Ukraїns’kyĭ istorychnyĭ zhurnal, 2020(3), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.15407/uhj2020.03.090
  • Kruglov, A. (2008). Jewish losses in Ukraine, 1941–1944. In R. Brandon & W. Lower (Eds.), The Shoah in Ukraine: History, testimony, memoralization (pp. 272–290). Indiana University Press.
  • Kruglov, А. (Ed.). (2002). Sbornik dokumentov i materialov ob unichtozhenii natsistami evreev Ukrainy v 1941–1944 godakh. Institut iudaiki.
  • Makovskaia, N. (2008). Arkhivy okupatsii 1941–1944 (2nd ed.). Kyievo-Mohylians’ka akademiia.
  • Mykhalchuk, R. (2020). “Small death jobs”: The role of forced civilian persons in the Nazi plans of the Holocaust in the general district of Volyn-Podillia (on the materials of Yahad-In Unum). East European Historical Bulletin, 15, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.24919/2519-058x.15.205144
  • Mykhalchuk, R. (2021). Rol’ ievreĭskoĭ vlasnosti v dynamitsi Holokostu v heneral’niĭ okruzi “Volyn’-Podillia”: Fokus mistsevoho neievreĭskoho naselennia. Problemy istoriї Holokostu: Ukraїns’kyĭ vymir, 13, 38–85. https://doi.org/10.33124/hsuf.2021.13.02
  • Shliakhtych, R. (2019). Holokost u sil’skiĭ mistsevosti Dnipropetrovs’koĭ oblasti (za materialamy svidchen’ ochevydtsiv z arkhivu Yahad-In Unum). Roxolania Historĭca, 2(17), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.15421/30190212
  • Usach, A. (2021). “To ne nimtsi…”: Mistsevi vynuvattsi Holokostu v neevreĭs’kykh usnoistorychnykh svidchenniakh. In H. Hrinchenko (Ed.), Slukhaty, chuty, rozumity: Usna istoriia Ukraїny ХХ–ХХІ stolit’ (pp. 143–161). TOV “Art-knyha”.
  • Williams, T. (2019). “I am not, what I am”: A typological approach to individual (in)action in the Holocaust. In C. Morina & K. Thijs (Eds.), Probing the limits of categorization: The bystander in Holocaust history (pp. 72–89). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.8
  • Zilinskyi, V. (2019). They were killed on the spot: The destruction of Jews during the nazi occupation in the territory of the Lviv region [Special issue]. Visnyk L’vivs’koho universytetu, 340–360.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
31339697

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_11649_ch_2908
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.