Quantum Meta-physics: Nonlocality and Limits of Determinism

• Authors: Bartosz Wesół

Abstracts

EN

This essay aims to show that the recent development of quantum theory may provide us with an answer to one of the most compelling metaphysical problems, namely the problem of determinism. First, I sketch the conceptual background and draw the distinction between metaphysical and epistemological determinisms. Then, on the ground of the analysis of the problem of determinism in quantum mechanics, I argue that (1) metaphysical determinism is independent of quantum-mechanical formalism, and (2) that quantum nonlocality makes epistemological determinism impossible. I also try to show that metaphysical determinism should be regarded as a Kantian regulative idea which sets the horizon for scientific inquiry but which at the same time lacks what Kant calls “objective validity.” The main conclusion is that metaphysical determinism should be regarded as an idealization – a formal, cognitive principle that we a priori assume and not something that we discover through scientific inquiry.

Keywords

EN

determinism; quantum mechanics; nonlocality; free will; Kant

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski
• Journal: Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 14-25

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Bartosz Wesół

• Faculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw

References

• Bell, John Stewart. “Are there Quantum Jumps?” In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, 201-212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
• Bell, John Stewart. “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.” In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, 14-21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
• Bell, John Stewart. “On the Impossible Pilot Wave.” In Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy, 159-168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
• Bigaj, Tomasz. Non-locality and Possible Worlds. Frankfurt-Lancaster-New Brunswick: Ontos Verlag, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110323306.
• Bigaj, Tomasz. “Non-local Character of Quantum Mechanics: 20 Years Later.” Activitas Nervosa Superior 61, no.1 (2019): 65-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41470-019-00046-z.
• Earman, John. A Primer on Determinism. Springer Science & Business Media, 1986.
• Einstein, Albert, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen. “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?” Physical Review 47, no. 10 (1935): 777-80. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777.
• Hilgevoord, Jan, and Jos Uffink. “The Uncertainty Principle.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed July 14, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/qt-uncertainty/.
• Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649.
• Lewis, Clive Staples. Mere Christianity. Harper Collins e-Books, 2001.
• Maudlin, Tim. Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77hrx.
• Poręba, Marcin. “Freedom, Symmetry Breaking and Reflective Judgements. An Attempt at an Incompatibilist Account of Freedom.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 1, no.1 (2017): 67-75.
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1986.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14394/eidos.jpc.2023.0030

Biblioteka Nauki

26917595