Określenia beneficjentów Kościoła katolickiego w szesnastowiecznej polszczyźnie

• Authors: Jolanta Migdał

Title variants

EN

Designations of the Beneficiaries of the Catholic Church in the 16th-Century Polish

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

The article discusses ten 16th-century designations of the beneficiaries of the Catholic Church, that is the persons endowed with offices, which were connected with specific profits. These names have been excerpted from the published volumes of Słownik polszczyzny XVI wieku (“The Dictionary of the 16th-Century Polish”). The article presents their origin and subsequent history. It is worth noting that the majority of the names of church beneficiaries that were confirmed in the 16th-century Polish language appeared just in that century. Despite the disappearance of offices and posts designated by them, the greater part of those lexemes have survived until today, if not in general Polish, than in its ecclesiastical variety as obsolete or historical lexemes. 

EN

The article discusses ten 16th-century designations of the beneficiaries of the Catholic Church, that is the persons endowed with offices, which were connected with specific profits. These names have been excerpted from the published volumes of Słownik polszczyzny XVI wieku (“The Dictionary of the 16th-Century Polish”). The article presents their origin and subsequent history. It is worth noting that the majority of the names of church beneficiaries that were confirmed in the 16th-century Polish language appeared just in that century. Despite the disappearance of offices and posts designated by them, the greater part of those lexemes have survived until today, if not in general Polish, than in its ecclesiastical variety as obsolete or historical lexemes. 

Keywords

PL

16th-century Polish; religious lexis; church beneficiaries

EN

16th-century Polish; religious lexis; church beneficiaries; 16th-century Polish; religious lexis; church beneficiaries

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Poznańskie Spotkania Językoznawcze
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 27

Dates

published

2014-01-01

Contributors

author

Jolanta Migdał

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Wydział Filologii Polskiej i Klasycznej

References

• Bajerowa I., 1980, Wpływ techniki na ewolucję języka polskiego, Kraków.
• Bańkowski A., 2000, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, t. 1–2, Warszawa.
• Bralczyk J. (red.), 2005, Słownik 100 tysięcy potrzebnych słów, Warszawa.
• Dubisz S. (red.), 2003, Uniwersalny słownik języka polskiego, t. 1–4, Warszawa.
• Encyklopedia Katolicka, 1973–2014, t. 1–19, Lublin.
• Gadacz T., Milerski B. (red.), 2001–2009, Religia. Encyklopedia PWN, t. 1–9, Warszawa.
• Malinowski M., Obcy język polski (236): Jak beneficjant stał się beneficjentem, www: obcyjezykpolski.strefa.pl/?md=archive&id=235 [dostęp: 15.05.2014].
• Mayenowa M.R., Pepłowski F., Mrowcewicz K. (red.), 1966–2011, Słownik polszczyzny XVI wieku, t. 1–35, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków.
• Moszyńska D., 1975, Morfologia zapożyczeń łacińskich i greckich w staropolszczyźnie, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków–Gdańsk.
• Salij J., 1997, Kościół jako instytucja, w: J. Salij, Pytania nieobojętne, Poznań, www.mateusz.pl lub www.nonpossumus.pl [dostęp: 15.05.2014].
• Sławski F., 1952–1982, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, t. 1–5, Kraków.
• Słownik języka polskiego XVII i 1. połowy XVIII wieku, www.sxvii.pl [dostęp: 15.05.2014].
• Urbańczyk S. (red.), 1953–2002, Słownik staropolski, t. 1–11, Kraków.
• www.ibl.waw.pl, tu: spxvi.edu.pl [dostęp: 15.05.2014].
• Zgółkowa H. (red.), 1994–2005, Praktyczny słownik współczesnej polszczyzny, t. 1–50, Poznań.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/10.14746/psj.2014.XXVII.7