Die Modularität als Schlüssel zum Verständnis des Sprachverarbeitungssystems – kognitive Modelle und ihre neuronale Basis

• Authors: Barbara Sadownik
• Languages of publication: DE

Abstracts

DE

The scope of this paper is the concept of modularity of language, which is a key to understanding the complexity of human cognitive system. The author of the paper presents various arguments in favor of the thesis that both moderate and extreme modularity-related theories allow, too much greater extent than non-modularity theories, for reconstruction and description of complex structures of the language perception and production.

Keywords

DE

modularity of mind; modular approaches; modular versus connectionist models of language processing; language perception; language production; syntactic processes in speech production; generative grammar; neuroimaging

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Glottodidactica
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 51-73

Dates

published

2014-01-01

Contributors

author

Barbara Sadownik

References

• Aitchinson, J., 1997. Wörter im Kopf. Eine Einführung in das mentale Lexikon. Tübingen:Niemeyer.
• Altman, G.T.M. (ed.), 1990. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Altmann, G.T.M., Steedman, M., 1988. Interaction with Context during Human Sentence Processing. Cognition 30, 191-238.
• Altmann, G.T.M., Kamide, J., 2004. Now You See It, Now You Don’t: Mediating the Mapping Between Language and the Visual World. In: Hendeson, J. M., Ferreira, F. (eds). The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World. New York: Psychology Press, 347-386.
• Anstatt, T. (ed.), 2007. Mehrsprachigkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Erwerb. Formen. Förderung.Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
• Binder, J., Frost, J.A. et al., 2000. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cerebral Cortex 10 (5), 512-28.
• Butterworth, B. (ed.), 1980. Language Production. Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press.
• Carruthers, P., 2006. The Architecture of the Mind: massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cavedini, P., Gorini, A., Bellodi, L., 2006. Understanding obsessive-compulsive disorder: focus on decision making. Neuropsychology Review 16 (1), 3-15.
• Chomsky, N., 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
• Chomsky, N., 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures, Dordrecht:Foris.
• Chomsky, N., 1984. Modular Approaches to the Study of the Mind. San Diego: University of California.
• Chomsky, N., 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N., 1995. The Minimalist Program. MA/London–Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N., 2000. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Crocker, W., Pickering, M.W., Charles Clifton, Ch., 2000. Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Dell, G., O’Seaghdha, P., 1991. Mediated and convergent lexical priming in language production: A comment on Levelt et al. 1991. Psychological Review 98, 604-614.
• Ellis, A., Young, A., 1988. Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hove, UK: Lawrence.
• Fodor, J., 1983. The Modularity of Mind. An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge Mass:MIT Press.
• Fodor, J., 1985. Précis of The Modularity of Mind. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8, 1-42.
• Fodor, J., 1998. Concepts. Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Fodor, J., 2000. The Mind Doesn't Work That Way. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Fodor, J., 2001. Language, Thought and Compositionality. Mind and Language 16, 1, 1-15.
• Fodor, J., Bever, Th. G., Garrett, M.F., 1974. The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Frazier, L., 1987. Theories of Sentence Processing. In: J. Garfield (ed.). Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 291-307.
• Frazier, L., 1990. Exploring the Architecture of the Language-Processing System. In: G.T.M. Altman, (ed.). Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 409-433.
• Frazier, L., Clifton, C., 1989. Successive Cyclicity in the Grammar and the Parser. Language and Cognitive Processes 4 (2), 93-126.
• Frazier, L., Clifton, C., 1996. Construal. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
• Frazier, L., Flores D’Arcais, G.B., 1989. Filler Driven Parsing: a Study of Gap Filling in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 331-44.
• Frazier, L., Villiers, J. (eds), 1990. Language Processing and Language Acquisition. Dordrecht:Kluwer.
• Friederici, A.D., 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 50, 259-281.
• Friederici, A., 2003. Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache. In: H.-O. Karnath, Thier, P. (eds). Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer, 215-241.
• Friederici, A.D., 2003. Sprachverarbeitung – Der Lauscher im Kopf. Geist und Hirn 2, 43-45.
• Friederici, A.D., 2004. Wie der Mensch Sprache versteht. Einblicke ins Gehirn. Bertha Benz-Vorlesung 22. Landenburg: Gottlieb Daimler und Karl Benz Stiftung.
• Friederici, A.D., 2005. Neuropsychological markers of early language acquisition: from syllables to sentences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 481-487.
• Friederici, A.D., 2006. Neurobiologische Grundlagen der Sprache. In: H.-O. Karnath,Thier, P. (eds), Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer. 2. Aufl., 346-355.
• Friederici, A.D. (ed.), 1999. Sprachrezeption. Band 2. Göttingen–Bern–Toronto–Seattle:Hogrefe.
• Friederici, A.D., Alter, K., 2004a. Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway view. Brain and Language 89, 267-276.
• Friederici, A.D., von Cramon, D.Y., 1999. Neurobiologische Grundlagen des Sprachverstehens.In: A.D. Friederici (ed.). Sprachrezeption. Band 2. Göttingen–Bern–Toronto–Seattle: Hogrefe, 307-349.
• Friederici, A.D., Kotz, S.A., 2003a. The brain basis of syntactic processes: Functional imaging and lesion studies. NeuroImage, Special Issue 20, 8-17.
• Friederici, A.D., Fiebach, C.J., Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., von Cramon, D.Y., 2006.Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 16, 1709-1717.
• Friederici, A.D., Gunter, T.C., Hahne, A., Mauth, K., 2004. The relative timing of syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. NeuroReport 15, 165-169.
• Friederici, A.D., Rüschemeyer, S.-A., Hahne, A., Friebach, C.J., 2003b. The role of the left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: Localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex 13, 170-177.
• Friederici, A.D., von Cramon, D.Y., Kotz, S.A., 2007. Role of the corpus callosum in speech comprehension: Interfacing syntax and prosody. Neuron 53 (1), 135-145.
• Friederici, A.D., Meyer, M., von Cramon, D.Y., 2000. Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language 74, 289-300.
• Garfield, J. (ed.), 1987. Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural Language Understanding, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Garrett, M.F., 1980. Levels of Processing in Sentence Production. In: Butterworth, B. (ed.). Language Production. Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. London: Academic Press, 66-97.
• Garrett, M.F., 1988. Processes in Language Production. In: Newmeyer, F.J. (ed.). Linguistic Theory: Extensions and Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press, 69-96.
• Hagoort, P., 2003. How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. NeuroImage 20 (Suppl. 1), 18-29.
• Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., Petersson, K.M., 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304, 438-41.
• Hartje, W., 2002. Funktionelle Asymmetrie der Großhirnhemisphären. In: Hartje, W., Poeck, K. (eds). Klinische Neuropsychologie. New York–Stuttgart: Thieme, 67-92.
• Hartje, W.K., Poeck, K. (eds), 2002. Klinische Neuropsychologie. New York–Stuttgart: Thieme.Henderson J. M., Ferreira F. (eds), 2004. The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World. New York: Psychology Press.
• Herrmann, Th., 1985. Allgemeine Sprachpsychologie. München: Urban & Scharzenberg.
• Herrmann, Th., Grabowski, J., 1994. Sprechen: Psychologie der Sprachproduktion. Heidelberg:Spektrum.
• Hickock, G., Poeppel, D., 2000. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (4), 131-138.
• Indefrey, P., Levelt, W.J.M., 2004. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition 92, 101-144.
• Jackendoff, R., 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
• Jackendoff, R., Pinker, S., 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for the evolution of language. Cognition 97, 211-225.
• Karnath, H.-O., Thier P. (ed.), 2006. Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer.
• Kotz, S.A., Frisch, S., von Cramon, D.Y., Friederici, A.D., 2003. Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 9, 1053-1060.
• Levelt, W.J.M., 1989. Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Levelt, W.J.M. (ed.), 1992. Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations. Cognition 42, 1-22.
• Levelt, W.J.M. (ed.), 1993. Lexical Access in Speech Production. Oxford: Blackwell.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/2014.41.1.4