Overconsumption, Procreation, and Morality

• Authors: John Mariana
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Thomas Young (2001) argues that overconsumption and procreation are morally equivalent, and thus that anyone who disapproves of overconsumption must arrive at the same normative judgment concerning procreation (or procreation beyond a certain threshold). Young presents an analogical argument in support of his claim, and defends it against four varieties of objections intended to show that the analogy is weak or faulty. I argue that Young’s defense of his argument fails, and that though a stronger case can be made for his claim of moral equivalence between procreation and overconsumption, a full defense of the claim would unfortunately require a moral theory that we presently do not have (namely, Derek Parfit’s Theory X, the theory of beneficence that would tell us how many people there should be). This is unfortunate because in the absence of successful rational grounds for such a claim concerning the moral value (or disvalue) of procreation relative to resource consumption, we are likely to overlook or misjudge the moral and other costs of population growth.

Keywords

EN

Population; population growth; overpopulation; overconsumption; environmentalism; procreation

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Ethics in Progress
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 52-65

Dates

published

2014-02-01

Contributors

author

John Mariana

• College of the Canyons, Santa Clarita, California

References

• Assadourian, E. et al. 2004. State of the World 2004. New York: W.W. Norton.
• Benatar, D. 2006. Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming Into Existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hall, Ch. A. S., Pontius Jr., R. G., Coleman, L., & Ko, J. 1994. “The Environmental Consequences of Having a Baby in the United States”. Population and Environment 15 (6): 505-524.
• Ignatieff, M. 2000. Virtual War: Kosovo and Beyond. New York: Picador. Leslie, J. 1996. The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of HumanExtinction. New York: Routledge.
• Modena, F., Rondinelli, C., & Sabatini, F. 2011. “Economic Insecurity and Fertility Intentions: The Case of Italy”. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Availablefrom: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/36353/.
• Narveson, J. 1967. “Utilitarianism and New Generations”. Mind 76 (301): 62-72.
• Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Tendo, M. & Meewalaarachchi, S. M. 2009. “Socio-Economic Determinants Affecting the Demand for Children: The Pervasive Sense of Crisis inJapan”. Meijo Asian Research Journal 1 (1): 77-83.
• Williams, B. 1981. “Persons, Character, and Morality”. In Wiliams, B. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1-19.
• Young, T. 2001. “Overconsumption and Procreation: Are They Morally Equivalent?”. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2): 183-192

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/eip.2014.1.3