Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 6 | 1 | 199-210

Article title

Searching for Bioethical Prescriptions in a Moral Lab

Content

Title variants

PL
Searching for Bioethical Prescriptions in a Moral Lab

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

PL
The paper reviews the book written by F.M. Kamm, entitled Bioethical Prescriptions: To Create, End, Choose, and Improve Lives (published in Oxford: Oxford University Press in 2013, pp. 599). Kamm is one of the most prominent analytical philosophers in moral philosophy, known from such works as Intricate Ethics (2007). She defends the rights-based approach to ethics and is also famous from constructing multilayered moral dilemmas. The review poses methodological questions, of whether scientific-like thought experiments performed in a moral lab, and the Method of Hypothetical Cases are able to transform our ethical dilemmas and provide any solutions. In the final part of the review, the first chapter of the book on Tolstoy’s essay (The Death of Ivan Ilych) is discussed in more detail.

Year

Volume

6

Issue

1

Pages

199-210

Physical description

Dates

published
2015-09-10

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie

References

  • Annas, G. 2010. Worst Case Bioethics. Death, Disaster, and Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ehics. Trans. W. D. Ross. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
  • Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Diamond, C. 1990. “How Many Legs.” In R. Gaita (ed.), Value and Understanding: Essays for Peter Winch. New York: Routledge: 149-178.
  • Dworkin, R. 1973. Life’s Dominion. An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage Books.
  • Dworkin, R. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge Mass., London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Kamm, F. M. 2007. Intricate Ethics. Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. 1984. “Choices, Values and Frames.” American Psychologist 39(4): 341-350.
  • Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 2010. Metafory w naszym życiu (Metaphors we Live By). Warszawa: Aletheia.
  • Nagel, T. 2005. “The Problem of Global Justice”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 33: 113-147.
  • Parens, E. & Asch, A. 2003. “Disability Rights Critique of Prenatal Genetic testing: Reflections and Recommendations.” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 9: 40-47.
  • Tolstoy, L. 2013. The Death of Ivan Ilych. Trans. L. & A. Maude. ReaderWorks. An Electronic Classics Series Publication.
  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”. Science 185(4157): 1124-31.
  • Williams, B. 1973. “Utilitarianism: For and Against.” In J. J. C. Smart, (ed.), An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_eip_2015_1_14a
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.