Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 23 | 247-300

Article title

Czy istnieją nowe możliwości zrozumienia składanek krzemiennych przy wykorzystaniu analizy czasowo-przestrzennej? Propozycja nowej metody

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
Are there any new possibilities to understand flint refitting using spatiotemporal analysis? A proposition of a new method

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Refitting of flint materials is in recent times a standard method of dealing with flint materials. Among the archaeologists, however, there is a feeling of insufficiency and disproportion between the time needed for conjoining the blocks and the scientific effects coming out of them. Above all, there is at present no method for comparing different effects with other conjoined blocks. Regardless it comes from one archaeological site or whether are from different ages or territorially distant from each other. The paper presents a proposition of a new method for the analysis of flint refittings. The idea of research is to determine the relationships between the various detached pieces. The results are presented in a graph which we can further analyze and compare with others. The process itself is similar to the simplification of functions invented by Newton and Gauss, which is why the name of the method: refitting calculus.

Year

Volume

23

Pages

247-300

Physical description

Dates

published
2019-09-16

Contributors

author
  • Państwowe Muzeum Archeologiczne

References

  • Allen, J. F. 1983 Maintaining Knowledge About Temporal Intervals. Communications of the Acm, 26(11), 832–843.
  • Asmussen, K., Qiang, Y., Maeyer, P. de, Weghe, N. van de 2009 Triangular models for studying and memorizing temporal knowledge. In C. L. Gómez, B. D. Martí, T. I. Candel (eds.), Proceedings of ICERI 2009 Conference. 16th–18th Nov 2009 (p. 1849–1859). Madrid: International Association of Technology, Education and Development.
  • Boroń, T. 2006 Organizacja przestrzeni w krzemienicach mazowszańskich na przykładzie zespołów krzemiennych ze stanowiska Nieborowa I, gm. Sawin, woj. lubelskie. Archeologia Polski, 51, 13–41.
  • Bosinski, G. 1966 Der paläelithischen Fundplaz Rheindahlen, Zeigelei Dressen-Westwand. Bonner Jahr- bücher, 166, 318–346.
  • Brézillon, M. N. 1971 La dénomination des objects de pierre taillée. Materiaux pour un vocabulaire des pré- historiens de langue française. IVe Supplement á Gallia Préhistoire. Paris: CNRS Éditions.
  • Bronowicki, J., Bobak, D. 1999 Schyłkowopaleolityczna pracownia krzemieniarska z miejscowości Ślęza (stanowisko 12) pod Wrocławiem. Przegląd Archeologiczny, 47, 7–25.
  • Cahen, D. 1989 Refitting Stone Artifacts: Why Bother? In de G. Sieveking, M. H. Newcomer (eds.), The Human Uses of Flint and Chert (p. 1–10). Cambridge: University Press.
  • Clarkson, C., Vinicius, L., Mirazon, M. 2006 Quantifying flake scar patterning on cores using 3D recording techniques. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 132–142.
  • Cooper, J., Qiu, F. 2006 Expediting and standardizing stone artifact refitting using a computerized suitability model. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 987–998.
  • Cziesla, E., Eickhoff, S., Arts, N., Winter, D. (eds.) 1990 The Big Puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Studies in Modern Archaeology 1. British Archaeological Reports International (Series 578). Bonn: Holos.
  • Cziesla, E. 1990 On Reffiting of Stone Artefacts. In E. Cziesla, S. Eickhoff, N. Arts, D. Winter (eds.), The Big Puzzle: International Symposium on Refitting Stone Artefacts, Monrepos, 1987. Studies in Modern Archaeology 1. British Archaeological Reports International (Series 578, p. 9–45). Bonn: Holos.
  • Delpiano, D., Peresani, M. 2017 Exploring Neanderthal skills and lithic economy. The implication of a refitted Discoid reduction sequencere constructed using 3D virtual analysis. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 16(8), 865–877.
  • Dziewanowski, M. 2006 Flint Assemblage Dręstwo 37. A Preliminary Analysis of Predetermined Swiderian Debitage. In A. Wiśniewski, T. Płonka, J. M. Burdukiewicz (eds.), The stone: technique and technology (p. 149–166). Wrocław. 2012 On the Classification of By-Products of the Reduction for Blades – Some Aspects of Technology in Swiderian Assemblages. Światowit, 9/B, 223–233.
  • Fiedorczuk, J. 2006 Final Paleolithic camp Organization as Seen from the perspective of Lithic Artifacts Refitting. Warszawa: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN.
  • Góralski, A. 1980 Twórcze rozwiązywanie zadań. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Grużdź, W., Pyżewicz, K., Migal, W., Przeździecki, M. 2011 Multi aspect analysis of flint materials from Suchodółka 3 site, the Świętokrzyskie voivodship. Światowit, 9(50), 245–278.
  • Hołówko, T. 2005 Kultura logiczna w przykładach. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Hofman, J. L. 1992 Putting the Pieces Together: An Introduction to Refitting. In J. L. Hofman, J. G. Enloe (eds.), Piecing Together Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology, British Archaeological Reports International (Series 578, p. 1–20). Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • Kirsh, D.2010 Thinking with external representations. Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, 25, 441–454.
  • Kobayashi, K. 2007 An obsidian refitting from Sos Höyük, eastern Turkey. Ancient Near Eastern, 4, 141–154.
  • Larson, M. L., Ingbar, E. E. 1992 Perspectives on refitting: Critique and a complementary approach. In J. L. Hofman, J. G. Enloe (eds.), Piecing Together Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeol- ogy, British Archaeological Reports International (Series 578, p. 151–162). Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • Leroi-Gourhan, A., Brézillon, M. 1966 L’Habitation Magdalenienne No. 1 Pincevent prés Montereau (Seine-et-Marne). Gallia Préhistoire, 9, 263–38.
  • Leroi-Gourhan, A., Brézillon, M.1972 Fouilles de Pincevent: Essai d’analyse ethongraphique d’un habitat magdalénien. VIIe supplement à Gallia Préhistoire.
  • Matraszek, B., Migal, W., Sałaciński, S. 2002 Składanki form rdzeniowych z jamy 424 z osady kultury pucharów lejkowatych ze stanowiska „Nad Wawrem” w Złotej, woj. świętokrzyskie. In B. Matraszek, S. Sałaciński (eds.), Krzemień świeciechowski w pradziejach, Materiały z konferencji w Ryni, 22–24.05.2000. Studia nad gospodarką surowcami krzemiennymi w pradziejach (p. 237–254). Warszawa: Państwowe Muzeum Archeologiczne.
  • Migal, W. 2006 On Various Methods of Lyngby Point Production. In A. Wiśniewski, T. Płonka, J. M. Burdukiewicz (eds.), The stone: technique and technology (p. 137–147). Wrocław.
  • Migal, W. 2007 On preferential points of the Final Paleolithic in Central European Lowland. In M. Kobusiewicz, J. Kabacinski (eds.), Studies in the Final Palaeolithic Settlement of the Great European Plain (p. 185–200). Poznań: Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Poznańskie Towarzystwo Prehistoryczne.
  • Ustyniak, I. 2015 Człowiek a czas: Kant Husserl (PhD Thesis). Łódź: University.
  • Pigeot, N. 1990 Technical and Social Actors: Flintknapping Specialists at Magdalenian Etiolles. Archa- eological Review from Cambridge, 9(1), 126–141.
  • Przeździecki, M. 2014 Krzemieniarstwo schyłkowopaleolitycznej kultury wołkuszańskiej w świetle analizy materiałów ze stanowiska 3 w Wołkuszu, gm. Lipsk n/Biebrzą, pow. augustowski, woj. Podlaskie (PhD Thesis). Warsawa: University.
  • Qiang, Y. 2012 Modeling temporal information in a two-dimensional space. Ghent, Belgium: Ghent University.
  • Qiang, Y., Delafontaine, M., Asmussen, K., Stichelbaut, B., Tre, G. de, Maeyer, P. de, Weghe, N. van de 2010 Modelling imperfect time intervals in a two-dimensional space. Control and Cybernetics, 39(4), 983–1010.
  • Szewczuk, W. 1984 Psychologia Zapamiętywania. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Scerri, E. M. L., Gravina, B., Blinkhorn, J., Faivre, J.-P., Delagnes, A. 2016 Can lithic attribute analyses identify discrete reduction trajectories? A quantitative study using refitted lithic sets. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 669–691.
  • Tomaszewski, A. J. 1986 Metoda składanek wytworów krzemiennych i jej walory poznawcze. Archeologia Polski, 31(2), 239–277.
  • Tversky, B. 2011 Visualizing Thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 499–535.
  • Wąs, M. 2005 Technologia krzemieniarstwa kultury janisławickiej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Inicjał.
  • Wilson, A. D., Golonka, S. 2013 Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(58), 1–13.
  • Wiśniewski, A., Serwatka, K., Badura, J. 2015 Nowe znaleziska kultury prądnickiej z terenu Płaskowyżu Głubczyckiego. Śląskie Sprawozdania Archeologiczne, 57, 7–30

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_fpp_2018_23_11
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.