Dialogic Signals in Argumentative Discussions o f Advanced Polish Learners of Englis dialogic signals

• Authors: Agnieszka Nowicka
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The first part of the paper deals with characteristics of classroom interaction as a type of institutional talk in a conversational analytic perspective. Next, the thesis is discussed concerning developing learners' interactional competence to foster learner discursive independence in argumentative discussions in English as a foreign language. Finally, after a short review of dialogic signals, the article presents a preliminary analysis of selected dialogic signals: evaluating reformulations and piggybacking as the ways of achieving reciprocity in argumentative discussions.

Keywords

EN

dialogic signalsargumentaitve discussions; learners of English

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Glottodidactica
• Year: 2005
• Volume: 30
• Pages: 177-194

Dates

published

2018-11-01

Contributors

author

Agnieszka Nowicka

References

• Atkinson, M.; Heritage, J. (eds.) (1984): Structures of Social Action. Studies in conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
• Basturkmen, H. (1998): Aspects of Impoverished Discourse in Academic Speaking: Implications for Pedagogy form a Mini-Corpus. Asian Journal o f English Language Teaching Vol. 8 , 81-91.
• Button, G.; Casey. N. (eds.) (1984): Generating topic: the use of topic initial elicitors. In: M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.): Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP, 167-191.
• Goodwin, C.; Goodwin M.J. (1990): Interstitial Argument. In: A. Grimshaw (ed.), 83-117.
• Górecka, J.; Nowicka, A. (2001): Rozwijanie autokontroli nad strategiami dyskursywnymi w interakcjach nacechowanych emocjonalnie u zaawansowanych studentów języka obcego. Neofilolog 20, 45-51.
• Grimshaw, A. (ed.) (1990): Conflict Talk. Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: CUP.
• Gülisch, E.; Kotschi, T. (1995): Discourse Production in Oral Communication. A Study Based on French. In: U. Quasthoff (ed.), 30-66.
• Heritage, J. (1984): A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), 299-346.
• House, J. (1982): Gambits in deutschen und englischen Alltagsdialogen. Versuch einer pragmatischkontrastiven Analyse. In: N. Denison; K. Sorning; H.P. Gadler; H. Grasseger, Perlokutionare Aspekte. Grazer Linguistische Studien 17/18, 110-121.
• Hutchby, J; Woofit, R. (1998): Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Polity Press.
• Jefferson, G. (1984): On stepwise transition from talk about trouble to inappropriately nextpositioned matters. In: M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), 191-223.
• Markee, N. (2000): Conversation Analysis. Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Mori, J. (1999): Well I may be Exaggerating But..: Self-Qualifying Clauses in Negotiation of Opinions Among Japanese Speakers. Human Studies 22, 447-473.
• Pomerantz, A. (1984a): Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In: M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), 57-102.
• Pomerantz, A. (1984b): Pursuing a response. In: M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), 152-165.
• Prokop, I. (1995): Erotetische Sprechakte im Deutschen und im Polnischen anhand natürlicher Gespräche. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
• Prokop, I. (2001): Typy interakcji w dydaktyce. Neofilolog 20, 13-22.
• Quasthoff, U. (ed.) (1995): Aspects o f Oral Communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
• Quasthoff, U. (1995): Orality and ontogenesis: towards the interactive constitution o f linguistic development. In: U. Quasthoff (ed.), 257-279.
• Sacks, H. (1984): Notes on methodology. In: M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), 21-28.
• Schegloff, E.A. (1984): On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In: Atkinson M. & J. Heritage (ed.), 28-53.
• Seedhouse, P. (1996): Learning Talk: A Study o f the Interactional Organization of the L2 Classroom from a CA Institutional Discourse Perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation.
• Silverman, D. (1998): Harvey Sacks. Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Smith, C. (2000): Facilitating ‘Persepectival Reciprocity’ in Mediation: Some reflections on a Failed Case. Human Studies 23,1-21.
• Wilczyńska, W. (1999): Uczyć się czy być nauczanym? O autonomii w przyswajaniu języka obcego. Warszawa: PWN.
• Wilczyńska, W. (2001): Autonomizacja jako przedmiot badań glottodydaktycznych. Neofilolog 20, 6- 12.
• Wilczyńska, W. (ed.) (2002): Doskonalenie się w komunikacji ustnej. Autonomizacja studentów a efektywność dydaktyki języków obcych. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/gl.2005.30.11