Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2013 | 3 | 1 | 47-88

Article title

Prywatne może być publiczne? Vouchery – najbardziej radykalna forma prywatyzacji amerykańskiej edukacji

Content

Title variants

EN
Private Might Be Public? Vouchers – the Most Radical Form of Privatization in American Education

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
Privatization is the main theme of educational politics in XXI century. The idea of vouchers is connected with the believe, that if parents can use publicly funded vouchers to cover tuition at the school of their choice, schools will be forced to compete for paying customers and hence will have reason to improve. But those who believe that education is a part of the implicit social contract required for an e ective democracy place emphasis on a school system that is free, publicly funded and guided by democratic decisions rather than that the market ones. Against vouchers was even Chief Justice Earl Warren, who have said that the opportunity of an education is a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.

Year

Volume

3

Issue

1

Pages

47-88

Physical description

Dates

published
2013-06-05

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

References

  • Apple M.W. 2006. Educating the „Right” Way. Markets, Standards, God and Inequality. NewYork.
  • ---
  • Arnove R.F. 1999. Introduction: Reframing Comparative Education: The Dialectic of Global the Local. W Comparative Education. The Dialectic of the Global and the Local. New York.
  • ---
  • Ascher C., N. Fruchter, R. Berne. 1996. Hard Lessons: Public Schools and Privatization. NewYork.
  • ---
  • Belfield C.R., H.M. Levin. 2005. Privatizing Educational Choice. Consequences for Parents, Schools and Public Policy. Boulder.
  • ---
  • Belfield C.R., H.M. Levin. 2007. The Price We Pay. Economic and Social Consequences of Inadequate Education. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Berman E.H. 1999. The Political Economy of Educational Reforms in Australia, England and Wales and the United States. W Comparative Education. New York.
  • ---
  • Betts J.R. 2005. The Economic Theory of School Choice. W Getting the Choice Right. Ensuring Equity and Efficiency in Education Policy. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Betts J.R., D. Goldhaber, L. Rosenstock. 2005. The Supply Side of School Choice. W Getting the Choice Right. Ensuring Equity and Efficiency in Education Policy. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Berube M.R. 1991. American Presidents and Education. New York.
  • ---
  • Brighouse H. 2000. School Choice and Social Justice. Oxford.
  • ---
  • Campbell D.E. 2006. School Choice And Social Cohesion. W Choice and Competition in American Education. New York.
  • ---
  • Carnoy M. 1999. Globalization and Educational Reform: What Planners Need to Know. Paris.
  • ---
  • Carnoy M. 2000. „School Choice? Or Is It Privatization?”. Educational Researcher 29 (7).
  • ---
  • Carnoy M. 2001. Do Vouchers Improve Failing Public Schools? W School Vouchers: Examining the Evidence. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Carnoy M. 2003. Does Privatization Improve Education? W Choosing Choice: School Choice in International Perspective. New York.
  • ---
  • Carnoy M., H.M. Levin. 1985. Schooling and Work in the Democratic State. Palo Alto.
  • ---
  • Carr M. 2011. „The Impact of Ohio’s Edchoice on Traditional Public School Performance”. The Cato Journal 31 (1).
  • ---
  • Chubb J.E. 2006. The Private Can Be Public. W Choice and Competition in American Education. New York.
  • ---
  • Chubb J.E., T. Moe. 1990. Politics, Markets and America’s Schools. Washington D.C.
  • ---
  • Chubb J.E., T. Moe. 1997. Politics, Markets and Equality in Schools. W Reducing Poverty in America. Thousand Oaks.
  • ---
  • Clotfelter Ch.T. 2001. „Are Whites Still Flying? Racial Patterns and Enrolment Shis in Urban Schools 1987–1996”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20.
  • ---
  • Coleman J.S. 1992. „Some Points on Choice in Education”. Sociology of Education 65, October.
  • ---
  • Comparative Education. The Dialectic of the Global and the Local. 1999. red. R.F. Arnove, C.A. Torres. New York.
  • ---
  • Corwin R.G., J.E. Schneider. 2005. The School Choice Hoax. Fixing America’s Schools. Westport.
  • ---
  • Coulson A. 1994. School Choice. New Haven.
  • ---
  • Coulson A. 1999. Market Education: The Unknown History. New York.
  • ---
  • Dalton B. 2012. „Grade Level and Science Achievement: US Performance in Cross-National Perspective”. Comparative Education Review 56 (1).
  • ---
  • Digest of Education Statistics 1999, 2000, Washington D.C.
  • ---
  • Farrel J.P. 1999. Changing Conception of Equality of Education. Forty Years of Comparative Evidence. W Comparative Education. Langham.
  • ---
  • Flam S., W. Keane. 1994. Public Schools, Private Enterprise. What We Should Know and What Do About Privatization. Lancaster.
  • ---
  • Friedman M. 1962. The Role of Government in Education. W M. Friedman. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago.
  • ---
  • Fuhrman S.H. 2003. Riding Waves, Trading Horses. The Twenty Years to Reform Education. W A Nation Reformed? Cambridge.
  • ---
  • Getting Choice Right. Ensuring Equity and Efficiency in Education Policy. 2005. red. J.R. Betts, T. Loveless. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Gill B.P. 2005. School Choice and Integration. W Getting Choice Right.Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Gill B.P., M.P. Timpane, D.C. Brewer. 2001. Rhetoric Versus Reality. What We Know and What We Need To Know about Vouchers and Charter Schools. Santa Monica.
  • ---
  • Glazer N. 2003. The American Way of School Reform. W A Nation Reformed? Cambridge.
  • ---
  • Goldhaber D., K. Guin, J. Henig, F. Hess, J. Weiss. 2005. How School Choice Affects Students Who Do Not Choose? Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Grossman P. 2003. Teaching: From a Nation at Risk to a Profession at Risk? W A Nation Reformed? Cambridge.
  • ---
  • Hamilton L.S., K. Guin. 2005. Understanding How Families Choose Schools. W Getting Choice Right. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Hanushek E.A. 1996. Student Resources and Student Performance. W Does Money Matter? Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Hanushek E.A., A.A. Lindseth. 2009. Schoolhouses, Courthouses and Statehouses. Solving The Funding-Achievement Puzzle in America’s Public Schools. Princeton.
  • ---
  • Hassel B.C. 2006. Charter Schools: Mom or Pops or Corporate Design. W Choice and Competition in American Education. Lanham.
  • ---
  • Hedges H.V., R.D. Laine, R. Greenwald. 1994. „Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes”. Educational Reasercher 23 (3).
  • ---
  • Henig J.R. 2005. Understanding the Political Con ict Over School Choice. W Getting Choice Right. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Hess F.M., T. Loveless. 2005. How School Choice Affects Student Achievement. W Getting Choice Right. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Heyneman S. 2005. The History and Problems in The Making Education Policy at the World Bank. W Global Trends in Education Policy. Amsterdam.
  • ---
  • Hill P.T. 2001. Introduction. W Rhetoric Versus Reality. Santa Monica.
  • ---
  • Hill P.T., J. Pierce, J. Guthrie. 1997. Reinventing Public Education: How Contracting Can Transform America’s Schools. Chicago.
  • ---
  • Howell, W.G., P.E. Peterson. 2002. The Education Gap. Vouchers and Urban Schools. Washington, D. C.
  • ---
  • Hoxby C.M. 2000. Would School Choice Change the Teaching Profession? Cambridge.
  • ---
  • Hoxby C.M. 2001. If Families Matter Most, Where Schools Come In? W Primer on America’s Schools. Stanford.
  • ---
  • Hoxby C.M. 2003. The Economics Of School Choice. Chicago.
  • ---
  • Hoxby C.M. 2006. Do Vouchers and Charters Push Public Schools to Improve? W Choice and Competition in American Education. Langham.
  • ---
  • Jones P. 2000. Globalization and Internationalism: Democratic Prospects for World. W Globalization and Education: Integration and Contestation Across The Cultures. Langham.
  • ---
  • Kahlenberg R. 2000. All Together Now: Creating Middle Class Schools through Public School Choice. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Kozol J. 2005. The Shame Of The Nation. The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. New York.
  • ---
  • Lemann N. 1991. „A False Panacea”. Atlantic Monthly, January.
  • ---
  • Levin H.M. 1998. ”Educational Vouchers: Effectiveness, Choice and Costs”. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17, June.
  • ---
  • Levin H.M. 2001. Privatizing Education. Can the Marketplace Deliver Choice, Efficiency and Social Cohesion? Boulder.
  • ---
  • Levin H.M. 2006. The Costs of Privatization. W Choice and Competition in American Education. Lanham.
  • ---
  • Lieberman M. 1986. Beyond Public Education. New York.
  • ---
  • Mecedo S. 2000. Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge.
  • ---
  • McMurtry J. 1998. Unequal Freedoms: the Corporate Markets As an Ethical System. Toronto.
  • ---
  • Merrifield J. 2001. The Schools Choice Wars. Langham.
  • ---
  • Mittang L.D., Ch. Connell. 2001. Setting the Agenda. Education Vouchers and the Media. W Privatizing Education. Boulder.
  • ---
  • Moe T. 2001a. Private Vouchers: Politics and Evidence. W School Choice or the Best Systems. What Improves Education? New York.
  • ---
  • Moe T. 2001b. Schools, Vouchers and American Public. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Moe T. 2006. A Union by any Other Name. W Choice and Competition in American Education. Lanham.
  • ---
  • Moore D., S. Davenport. 1998. Choice: the New Improved Sorting Machine. Madison.
  • ---
  • Morrow R.A., C.A. Torres. 1999. The State, Social Movements and Education Reform. W Comparative Education. Langham.
  • ---
  • Mundy K. 2007. Education For All: Paradoxes And Prospects Of A Global Promise. W Education for All: Global Promises, National Challenges. Amsterdam.
  • ---
  • Murphy D., H.F. Nelson, B. Rosenberg. 1997. The Cleveland Voucher Program: Who Choses? Who Gets Choosen? Who Pays? New York.
  • ---
  • Myers D.E. 2001. Criteria For Evaluating School Voucher Studies. W Privatizing Education. Boulder.
  • ---
  • Natriello G. 2001. Vouchers, Privatization and the Poor. W Privatizing Education. Boulder.
  • ---
  • Patrinos H., F. Barrera-Osorio, J. Guaqueta. 2009. The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnership in Education. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Petersman E.U. 2000. „The WTO Constitution and Human Rights”, Journal of International Economic Law 3 (25).
  • ---
  • Peterson P.E. 2006a. Reforming Education in Florida. Stanford.
  • ---
  • Peterson P.E. 2006b. Choice and Competition in American Education. Lanham.
  • ---
  • Rawls J. 1994. Teoria sprawiedliwości. Warszawa.
  • ---
  • Rouse C. 1998. Comment (to) T. Loveless, The Use and Misuse of Research in Educational Reform. W Education Policy. Washington D.C.
  • ---
  • Rothstein L.F. 1999. School Choice and Students with Disabilities. W School Choice and Social Controversy. Washington D.C.
  • ---
  • Rust V., J. James. 2005. Globalization and Educational Policy Shifts. W International Handbook on Globalization and Policy Research. Dordrecht.
  • ---
  • Samoff J. 1999. Institutionalizing International Infuence. W Comparative Education. Lanham.
  • ---
  • Sarason S. 1990. The Predictable Failure of Education Reform. San Francisco.
  • ---
  • Schneider M. et al. 1998. „Shopping for Schools: in the Land of the Blind, The One-Eyed Parent May Be Enough”. American Journal of Political Science 42, July.
  • ---
  • Schneider M., P. Teske, M. Marschall. 2000. Choosing Schools: Consumer Choice and the Quality of American Schools. Princeton.
  • ---
  • School Choice: A Special Report. 1992. Princeton.
  • ---
  • Smith K.B., K.J. Meier. 1995. The Case Against School Choice: Politics, Markets and Fools. Armonk.
  • ---
  • Smith M.S., B.W. Scoll. 1995. „The Clinton Human Capital Agenda”. Teachers College Record 96.
  • ---
  • Spring J. 2002. Political Agendas for Education: From the Religious Right to the Green Party. Mahwah.
  • ---
  • Spring J. 2008. „Research on Globalization and Education”. Review of Educational Research 78 (2).
  • ---
  • Steiner-Khamsi G. 2010. „The Politics and Economics of Comparison”. Comparative Education Review 54 (3).
  • ---
  • Tough Choices, Tough Times. The Report of the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce 2007. Washington, D.C.
  • ---
  • Tucker M. 2004. Reaching for Coherence in School Reform. The Case of America’s Choice. W Expanding the Research of Education Reforms. Perspectives From Leaders of The Scale-Up of Educational Interventions. Santa Monica.
  • ---
  • Vestergen D.A., D.L. Clark. 1998. „The Diminution In Federal Expenditures for Education During the Reagan Administration”. Phi Delta Kappan, October.
  • ---
  • West M.R. 2003. The Future of Tax Credits. W The Future of School Choice. Stanford.
  • ---
  • Wexler P. 1987. Social Analysis of Education: Afer the New Sociology. London.
  • ---
  • Whitty G., S. Power, D. Halpin. 1998. Devolution and Choice in Education: the School, the State and the Market. Buckingham.
  • ---
  • Witte J.F. 2000. The Market Approach to Education: An Analysis of American First Voucher Program. Princeton.
  • ---
  • Wolf P. J. 2005. School Choice and Civil Values. W Getting Choice Right. Washington D.C.
  • ---
  • Woodhouse H. 2001. „Ultimately Life is Not for Sale”. Interchange 33 (3).
  • ---
  • Woodhouse H. 2011. „Your Money or Your Life! A Critical Canadian Perspective on the World Bank „Reform Agenda” for Higher Education”. Journal of International Education.
  • ---
  • Zupan M.A. 2011. „The Virtues of Free Markets”. Cato Journal 31 (2).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_kse_2013_3_1_03
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.