Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 8 | 1 | 225-236

Article title

On the Epistemic Value of Eros. The Relationship Between Socrates and Alcibiades

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Several key lines concerning the relationship between Socrates and Alcibiades, extracted from the Symposium and the Alcibiades 1, are discussed for the purpose of detecting the epistemic value that Plato attributed to eros in his new model of education. As result of this analysis, I argue for the philosophical significance of the relationship between Socrates and Alcibiades as a clear example – even when failed – of the epistemic role of eros in the dialogically extended knowledge.

Keywords

EN

Year

Volume

8

Issue

1

Pages

225-236

Physical description

Dates

published
2017-10-24

Contributors

  • University of Edinburgh

References

  • Allen, D., 2010, Why Plato Wrote, Malden.
  • Brisson, L., 2016, “Éros éducateur: entre paiderastía et philósophia”, in: M. Tulli. M. Erler (eds.), Plato in Symposium. Selected Papers from the Tenth Symposium Platonicum, Sankt Augustin, pp. 24–35.
  • Brisson, L., 2006, “Agathon, Pausanias, and Diotima in Plato’s Symposium. Paiderastia and Philosophia”, in: J. H. Lesher, D. Nails, F. C. C. Sheffield (eds.), Plato’s Symposium. Issues in Interpretation and Reception, Cambridge, pp. 229–251.
  • Brisson, L., 2008. “Reminiscence in Plato”, in: J. Dillon, M.-É. Zovko (eds.), Platonism and Forms of Intelligence, Sankt Augustin, pp. 179–190.
  • Candiotto, L., fortchoming a. “Plato’s dialogically extended cognition. Cognitive transformation as elenctic catharsis”, in: P. Meinek, J. Devereux (eds.), Routledge Companion to Classics and Cognitive Theory, Routledge.
  • Candiotto, L., 2017. “Purification through emotions. The role of shame in Plato’s Sophist 230b4–e5”, Educational Philosophy and Theory (special issue “Bildung and paideia: Philosophical Models of Education”, eds. J. Dillon, M. L. Zovko). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1373338
  • Candiotto, L., 2015, “Aporetic State and Extended Emotions: the Shameful Recognition of Contradictions in the Socratic Elenchus”, Ethics & Politics 17, pp. 233–248 (special issue on “The Legacy of Bernard Williams’s Shame and Necessity”, ed. A. Fussi).
  • Candiotto, L., 2013, “Socrate e l’educazione dei giovani aristocratici”, in: A. Stavru, F. De Luise (eds.). Socratica III, Sankt Augustine, pp. 190–198.
  • Cooper, J. M. (ed.), 1997, Plato, Complete Works, Indianapolis–Cambridge.
  • Cornelli, G., 2016, “He longs for him, he hates him and he wants him for himself: The Alcibiades Case between Socrates and Plato”, in: G. Cornelli (ed.), Plato’s Style and Character, Berlin–Boston, pp. 281–295.
  • Cornford, F. M., 1950 (first version 1937). “The Doctrine of Eros in Plato’s Symposium”, in: F. M. Cornford, The Unwritten Philosophy and Other Essays, pp. Cambridge, pp. 68–80.
  • Danzig, G., 2010, Apologizing for Socrates. How Plato and Xenophon Created Our Socrates, Lanham.
  • Dorter, K., 1982, Plato’s Phaedo: An Interpretation, Toronto–London.
  • Gemes, K., 2015, “Freud and Nietzsche on the Nature and Value of Sublimation”, Iyyun – The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 64, pp. 243–263.
  • Gill, C., 1990, “Platonic Love and Individuality”, in: A. Loizon, H. Lesser (eds.), Polis and Politics. Essays in Greek Moral and Political Philosophy, Aldeshot, pp. 69–88.
  • Gordon, J., 2012, Plato’s Erotic World. From Cosmic Origins to Human Death, Cambridge.
  • Hatzefeld, J., 1951, Alcibiade. Étude sur l’histoire d’Athènes à la fin du V siècle, Paris.
  • Hobbs, A., 2006, “Female Imagery in Plato”, in: J. H. Lesher, D. Nails, F. C. C. Sheffield (eds.), Plato’s Symposium. Issues in Interpretation and Reception, Cambridge, pp. 252–271.
  • Lear, A., Cantarella, E., 2008, Images of ancient Greek pederasty: boys were their Gods, London–New York.
  • Nussbaum, M., 1994, “Platonic Love and Colorado Law: the Relevance of Ancient Greek Norms to Modern Sexual Controversies”, Virginia Law Review 80, pp. 1515–1651.
  • Renaut, O., 2016, “La pédérastie selon Pausanias: un défi pour l’éducation platonicienne”, in: M. Tulli, M. Erler (eds.), Plato in Symposium. Selected Papers from the Tenth Symposium Platonicum, Sankt Augustin, pp. 140–147.
  • Rowe, C., 2008, Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing, Cambridge.
  • Rudebusch, G., 2009, “Socratic Love”, in: S. Ahbel-Rappe, R. Kamtekar (eds.), A Companion to Socrates, Chichester, pp. 186–199.
  • Sassi, M. M., 2011, “Eros as psychic energy. Plato and fluxes of the soul”, in: M. Migliori, L. Napolitano Valditara, A. Fermani (eds.), Inner Life and Soul. Psychê in Plato, Sankt Augustin, pp. 251–265.
  • Scott, G. A., 2000, Plato’s Socrates as Educator, Albany.
  • Vallejo Campos, A., 2011, “The images of the Good and the interior life of the soul”, in: M. Migliori, L. Napolitano
  • Valditara, A. Fermani (eds.), Inner Life and Soul. Psychê in Plato, Sankt Augustin, pp. 299–306.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_pea_2017_1_14
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.