Embedded concepts: Comparative analysis of the meaning of education policies

• Authors: Jekatyerina Dunajeva , Hanna Siarova

Abstracts

EN

The study demonstrates that the definition and meaning of education, and by extension of educational inequality, are embedded in countries’ historical, political and social environments, while also responding to exogenous changes and international trends. We comparatively discuss the experience of 4 countries (Norway, Finland, Lithuania and Hungary) in order to unpack the historical underpinnings of the way education is framed in policy documents. Building on that, we review the effects of neoliberal ideas with their universalist dogma that have affected policy making in all cases, and assess to what extent the meaning of education was decoupled from its historical framework. Our findings are relevant for understanding not only the process of policy change, but in particular how the meaning of concepts within educational policy change over time. We suggest that embedded concepts carry meaning that has evolved over time and became strongly entangled with the country’s history and culture, while prevailing ideologies (neoliberalism and in the case of Hungary that of neoconservatism) also generate considerable effects on education policies.

Keywords

EN

embedded; education policy; neoliberalism; national context

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Przegląd Krytyczny
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 15-32

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Jekatyerina Dunajeva

• HUN-REN Centre for Social Sciences

• https://orcid.org/0000000318266731

author

Hanna Siarova

• Public Policy and Management Institute

• https://orcid.org/0000000223294449

References

• Ahonen, S. (2014). A School for All in Finland. In U. Blossing, G. Imsen, & L. Moos, The Nordic Education Model. Policy Implications of Research in Education (pp. 77-93). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Antikainen, A., Houtsonen, J., Houtsonen, H., & Kauppila, J. (1995). In Search of the Meaning of Education: The case of Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 39(4), 295-309.
• Bakke, I. B. (2023). Career and cultural context: collective individualism, egalitarianism and work-centrality in the career thinking of Norwegian teenagers. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 51(1), 1-16.
• Baltodano, M. (2023). Neoliberalism and the demise of public education: The corporatization of schools of education. In B. M. Jones, & S. J. Ball, Neoliberalism and Education (pp. 78-98). New York: Routledge.
• Bankauskaite, R., & Dunajeva, K. (2022). Country report Lithuania on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Vilnius: PPMI.
• Basic Education Act. (1998). Retrieved from https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1998/19980628
• Béland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2011). Introduction: Ideas and Politics. In D. Béland, & R. H. Cox, Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research (pp. 3-20). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Bell, L., & Stevenson, H. (2006). Education policy: Process, themes and impact. London: Routledge.
• Bjørnsrud, H., & Nilsen, S. (2021). De uferdige utdanningsreformer og Fagfornyelsen (LK20) : om det som var, det som er, og det som ennå ikke er til. Oslo: Gyldendal.
• Bjordal, I., & Haugen, C. R. (2021). (2021). Fra fellesskole til konkurranseskole : markedsretting i grunnskolen - sentrale virkemidler og lokale erfaringer. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
• Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (2014). 'A School for All' Encounters Neo-Liberal Policy. London: Springer.
• Bollig, S., Joos, M., Bindges, A.-L., Herzer, M., Kliche, H., & Rottwinkel, F. (2022). Country report Germany on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and update of education. Trier: Universitat Trier.
• Brunila, K. (2014). The rise of survival discourse in the era of therapization and neoliberalism. Education Inquiry, 5(1), 7-23.
• Bruzgelevičiūtė, R. (2008). Lietuvos švietimo kūrimas 1988-1997 [Development of Lithuanian education 1988-1997]. Vilnius: Sapnų sala.
• Cahill, K. (2015). Seeing the Wood from the Trees: A Critical Policy Analysis of Intersections between Social Class Inequality and Education in Twenty-first Century Ireland. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 301-316.
• Cardno, C. (2018). Policy Document Analysis: A Practical Educational Leadership Tool and a Qualitative Research Method. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 623-640.
• Carvalho, L. (2020). Revisiting the Fabrications of PISA. In G. Fan, & T. Popkewitz, Handbook of Education Policy Studies. Singapore: Springer.
• Codd, J. A. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235-247.
• Cohen, M. I. (2021). Education populism? A corpus-driven analysis of Betsy DeVos’s education policy discourse. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29(16).
• Corral-Granados, A., Rapp, A. C., & Smeplass, E. (2023). Nordic challenges related to exclusion and local responses in Swedish, Finnish, and Norwegian urban compulsory education. Education Inquiry.
• d'Agnese, V. (2018). Reclaiming Education in the Age of PISA: Challenging OECD’s Educational Order. New York: Routledge.
• Dobbins, M., & Martens, K. (2012). Towards an education approach à la finlandaise? French education policy after PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 23-43.
• Dunajeva, J. (2022). Comparative analysis report on the evolution of concepts, definitions and prioritization of vulnerable groups in public policy documents. PIONEERED.
• Dunajeva, J., Lőrincz, B., & Siarova, H. (forthcoming). Change and evolution of policy approaches to educational inequality in Hungary and Lithuania through time.
• Želvys, R. (2015). Lithuania: education policy and reforms, 1988-2014. In T. Corner, Education in the European Union: Post-2003 Member States (pp. 151-170). London: Bloomsbury.
• el Bouhali, C. (2015). The OECD Neoliberal Governance Policies of International Testing and Their Impact on Global Education Systems. In A. A. Abdi, L. Shultz, & T. Pillay, Decolonizing Global Citizenship Education (pp. 119–129). Boston: Brill.
• Fanelli, C., & Evans, B. (2015). Capitalism in the classroom: The commodification of education. Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research, 26.
• Ferge, Z. (2017). Iskola és esélyek [School and chances]. In Z. Ferge, Társadalom- és szociálpolitika. Magyarország 1990–2015 [Society and social policy. Hungary 1990–2015] (pp. 188–214). Budapest: Osiris.
• Halász, G. (2015). Education and Social Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Education, 50(3), 350–71.
• Hamilton, M., & Pitt, K. (2011). Changing policy discourses: Constructing literacy inequalities Author links open overlay panel. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(6), 596-605.
• Horst, C., & Pihl, J. (2010). Comparative perspectives on education in the multicultural Nordic countries. Intercultural Education, 21(2), 99-105.
• Joakim, J., Kvaale-Conateh, L. A., Jobst, S., Strand, D., Thyssen, G., Nagy, H. M., & Skrobanek, J. (2022). Country report Norway on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Bergen: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences and University of Bergen.
• Knodel, P., Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). PISA as an ideational roadmap for policy change: Exploring Germany and England in a comparative perspective. Globalization, Societies and Education, 11(3), 421-441.
• Kuusisto, A., Poulter, S., & Harju-Luukkainen, H. (2021). Worldviews and National Values in Swedish, Norwegian and Finnish Early Childhood Education and Care Curricula. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 11(2), 41-62.
• Lőrincz, B. (2022). Country report Hungary on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Budapest: Tárki.
• Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.
• Lergetporer, P., Werner, K., & Woessmann, L. (2018). Educational Inequality and Public Policy Preferences: Evidence from Representative Survey Experiments. Retrieved from IZA DP No. 11730: https://docs.iza.org/dp11730.pdf
• Marcussen, M. (2004). OECD Governance through Soft Law. In U. Mörth, Soft Law in Governance and Regulation. An Interdisciplinary Analysis (pp. 103-126). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 281–309.
• Martens, Kerstin, & Jakobi, A. P. (2010). Introduction to the OECD as an Actor in International Politics. In K. Martens, & A. Jakobi, Mechanisms of OECD Governance – International Incentives for National Policy making? (pp. 1-25).
• Matonyte, I., Šumskas, G., & Morkevičius, V. (2016). Europeanness of Lithuanian Political Elite: Europhilia, Russophobia and Neoliberalism. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 41(4), 150–172.
• Moutsios, S. (2009). International organizations and transnational education policy. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 39(4), 469-481.
• Muench, R., Wieczorek, O., & Dressler, J. (2023). Equity lost: Sweden and Finland in the struggle for PISA scores. European Educational Research Journal, 22(3), 413-432.
• Mukherjee, M. (2017). Global Design and Local Histories: Culturally embedded meaning-making for Inclusive Education. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 16(3), 32–48.
• Neumann, E. (2013). Politika a padsorok között. Az oktatási integrációs közpolitika Magyarországon (2002–2010) [Politics between the desks. Social policy of educational integration in Hungary (2002–2010)]. In E. Berényi, G. Erőss, & E. Neumann, Tudás és politika. A közpolitika-alkotás gyakorlatának nyomában [Knowledge and politics. Following the practice of public policy-making] (pp. 117–167). Budapest: L’Harmattan.
• Neumann, E. (2023). Education for a Christian nation: Religion and nationalism in the Hungarian education policy discourse. European Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 646-665.
• OECD. (2023). PISA 2022: Insights and Interpretations.
• Ouakrim-Soivio, N., Rautopuro, J., & Hildén, R. (2018). Shadows under the North Star: The inequality developing in Finnish school education. Nordidactica: Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education, 3, 65–86.
• Ozga, J., & Jones, R. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: the case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), 1-17.
• Parker, S., Gulson, K. N., & Gale, T. (2017). Policy and Inequality in Education . Singapore: Springer.
• Pata, K., Maslo, I., & Jõgi, L. (2021). Transforming Adult Education from Neo-liberal to Holistically Inclusive Adult Education in Baltic States. In N. Kersh, H. Toiviainen, P. Pitkänen, & G. Zarifis, Young Adults and Active Citizenship. Lifelong Learning Book Series, vol 26 (pp. 139–165). Cham: Springer.
• Pranckūnienė, E. (2017). The Dimensions Of Trust In Transition From Soviet to Neoliberal Education In Lithuania. European Educational Research Association. ECER.
• Rissanen, I., & Poulter, S. (2023). Religions and Worldviews as “The Problem” in Finnish Schools. In M. Thrupp, P. Seppänen, J. Kauko, & S. Kosunen, Finland’s Famous Education System (pp. 385-400). Singapore: Springer.
• Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2006). Globalization and the changing nature of the OECD’s educational work. In L. H., B. P., J. Dillabough, & H. Halsey, Education, globalization & social change (pp. 247-260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Robertson, S. L. (2012). Researching Global Education Policy: Angles In/On/Out... . In A. Verger, M. Novelli, & H. Altinyelken, Global Education Policy andInternational Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies. New York: Continuum.
• Saarinen, T., & Ursin, J. (2012). Dominant and emerging approaches in the study of higher education policy change. Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 143-156.
• Simonová, N. (2008). Educational Inequalities and Educational Mobility under Socialism in the Czech Republic. The Sociological Review, 56(3), 429-453.
• Skarpenes, O., & Sakslind, R. (2010). Education and Egalitarianism: The Culture of the Norwegian Middle Class. Sociological Review, 58(2), 219-243.
• Spring, J. (2008). Research on Globalization and Education. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 330-363.
• Spring, J. (2014). Globalization of Education: An Introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
• Szabó, Á. (1998). Szegénység és iskola. Kor- és kórkép a tanulásban akadályozott népesség iskoláztatásáról [Poverty and school. On the schooling of the population living with learning difficulties]. Budapest: Trezor.
• Teng, S. S., Bakar, M. A., & Layne, H. (2020). Education reforms within neoliberal paradigms: A comparative look at the Singaporean and Finnish education systems. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(4), 458-471.
• Toom, A., Kleemola, K., Hyytinen, H., & Tuononen, T. (2022). Country report Finland on Mapping concepts, definitions and prioritization in policy documents with special focus on educational inequality and tactics to enhance access and uptake of education. Helsinki: Helsingin Yliopisto.
• Torres, C. A. (2008). Education and neoliberal globalization. New York: Routledge.
• Uljens, M. (2007). The hidden curriculum of PISA - The promotion of neo-liberal policy by educational assessmen. In S. T. Hopman, G. Brinek, & M. Retzl, PISA zufolge PISA – PISA according to PISA. Does PISA keep what it promises? (pp. 295-303). Vienna: LIT Verlag.
• Urbanovič, J., Navickaitė, J., & Dačiulytė, R. (2019). Autonomy, Collaboration and Competition: The Impact of Education Management Reforms which Aim to Increase School Autonomy on Relations between Schools. The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, XII(1), 175-197.
• Verger, A., Novelli, M., & Altinyelken, H. (2012). GlobalEducation Policy and International Development: An Introductory Framework. In A. Verger, M. Novelli, & H. Altinyelken, Global Education Policy andInternational Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies. New York: Continuum.
• Volante, L., & Klinger, D. A. (2021). PISA and Education Reform in Europe: Cases of Policy Inertia, Avoidance, and Refraction. European Education, 53(1), 45-56.
• Volckmar, N. (2016). Utdanningshistorie: grunnskolen som samfunnsintegrerende institusjon. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.
• Wiig, K. (2023). Social inequality and the Norwegian education system: defining issues differently. Retrieved from University of Oslo: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/105106/1/Kaja-Wiig--Master-.pdf
• Zhou, X., Rinne, R., & Kallo, J. (2018). Shifting discourses of equality and equity of basic education: An analysis of national policy documents in China. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(3), 168-179.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/pk.2023.5.2.2

Biblioteka Nauki

28407242