The directions of development of the new Chinese ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ (BRI)

• Authors: Zdzisław W. Puślecki

Title variants

PL

Kierunki rozwoju nowej chińskiej inicjatywy Pasa i Drogi

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In this research work, the author focuses on the analysis of the directions of development of the new Chinese ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ (BRI) or ‘One Belt, One Road’ (OBOR) as a project launched by China to develop countries and improve global connectivity. First unveiled in 2013 by Chinese President Xi Jinping, the initiative continues to grow in scale and popularity. The initiative is focused on creating networks that will allow for a more efficient and productive free flow of trade as well as further integration of international markets both physically and digitally. BRI is comprised of the ‘21st Century Maritime Silk Road’ and the ‘Silk Road Economic Belt;’ together they will connect more than 65 countries making up over 62% of the world’s population, around 35% of the world’s trade and over 31% of the world’s GDP. It will take the form of a series of highways, railways and ports as well as facilities for energy, telecommunications, healthcare and education. It must be emphasized that the initiative merges both the land-based Silk Road (from China via Central Asia to Turkey and the EU) with the Maritime Route (via the Indian Ocean and Africa to Europe). Both routes were created with the intention of developing transportation infrastructure, facilitating economic development and increasing trade. This 21st-century initiative is not merely for China to romanticize its historical legacies: it carries major strategic economic and geopolitical calculations. The EU must decide now if and how to engage in these emerging processes. The main aim of the article is to present the directions of development of the new Chinese ‘Belt and Road Initiative’ (BRI) as a project, launched by China to develop countries and improve global connectivity.

PL

Szlak jedwabny od czasów starożytnych do wczesnego średniowiecza był głównym szlakiem handlowym łączącym Chiny z Europą i Bliskim Wschodem. Chiny zapowiedziały w roku 2013 rewitalizację tego szlaku dla intensywnego wsparcia swojej gospodarki. Zamierzają one przeznaczyć ok. 113 miliardów euro na infrastrukturę nowych tras handlowych do Europy, Azji i Afryki. Pojawiają się jednak obawy, że Chiny będą chciały w ten sposób rozszerzyć przede wszystkim swój wpływ na gospodarkę światową. Podkreśla się, że nikt nie chce Chinom zabronić budowy infrastruktury, lecz chodzi raczej o współpracę, która byłaby ekonomicznym sukcesem dla wszystkich stron. Z tego względu plany Australii, Stanów Zjednoczonych, Indii i Japonii w kierunku zachowania określonej równowagi, należy postrzegać raczej jako alternatywę niż jako konkurencję do nowego jedwabnego szlaku.

Keywords

EN

Belt and Road; initiative; China; European Union; infrastructure; Belt and Road; initiative; China; European Union; infrastructure

PL

pas i droga; inicjatywa; Chiny; Unia Europejska; infrastruktura

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Przegląd Politologiczny
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 33-54

Dates

published

2019-06-28

Contributors

author

Zdzisław W. Puślecki

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-9993

References

• Bagwell K., Staiger R. W. (1999), Domestic Policies, National Sovereignty and International Economic Institutions, “NBER Working Papers”, 7293, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
• Barreau J. (ed.) (1990), L’Etat enterpreneur. Nationalisation, gestion du secteur public concourrentiel, construction européenne, Paris.
• Bathelt H. (2003), Growth regimes in spatial perspective 1: innovation, institutions and social systems, “Progress in Human Geography”, 27 (6), pp. 789–804.
• Besha P. (2013), National, Regional and Sectoral Innovation Systems in China: General Overview and Case Studies of Renewable Energy and Space Technology Sectors, ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 – 1346.
• Cao C., Suttmeier R. P., Simon D. F. (2006), China’s 15-year science and technology plan, “Physics Today”, December, pp. 38–43.
• Crookes P. I. (2013), Resetting EU–China relations from a values-based to an interests-based engagement, Contemporary China Studies Programme, School of Interdisciplinary Area Studies, University of Oxford, 74 Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HP, UK.
• Doherty A. N., Lu F. V. (2013), China: Spectacular Growth and Inequality, “Journal of Business and Economics”, March, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 195–201.
• Downs E. S. (2008), China’s “New” Energy Administration, “China Business Review”, November–December.
• Hou M. I., Zhang D. W. (2012), Lessons from photovoltaic policies in China for future development, “Energy Policy” 51, pp. 38–45.
• https://www.aiib.org/en/projects/approved/index.htm, June 9, 2018.
• https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/building-new-silk-road, June 6, 2018.
• http://www.chinadiscovery.com/china-silk-road-tours/maps.html, June 9, 2018.
• http://www.chinainvestmentresearch.org/press/massive-chinese-lending-directed-to-silk-road/, June 9, 2018.
• http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/05/07/interactive-map-follow-the-roads-railways-and-pipelines-on-chinas-new-silk-road/, June 9, 2018.
• http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/commodities-crash-boosts-chinas-new-silk-road/, June 9, 2018.
• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312533416_One_Belt_One_Road_Visions_and_Challenges_of_China’s_Geoeconomic_Strategy, June 9, 2018.
• http://www.silkroutes.net/orient/mapssilkroutestrade.htm, June 9, 2018.
• http://www.silkroutes.net/OBOR/9MapWallStreetJounal.jpg, June 9, 2018.
• http://thediplomat.com/2015/09/chinas-silk-road-initiative-is-at-risk-of-failure/, June 9, 2018.
• https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/11/europe-china-new-silk-road, June 7, 2018.
• Jones K. (2015), Reconstructing the World Trade Organization for 21st Century, An Institutional Approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford–New York.
• Kuijs L. (2009), China through 2020 – A microeconomic scenario, “World Bank Research Paper”, no. 9.
• Heilmann S., Schmidt D. H. (2014), China’s Foreign Political and Economic Relations. A Unconventional Global Power, Rowman&Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland, USA.
• Pu X. (2018), One Belt, One Road: Visions and Challenges of China’s Geoeconomic Strategy, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312533416_One_Belt_One_Road_Visions_and_Challenges_of_China’s_Geoeconomic_Strategy, June 9, 2018.
• Xiaobo L. (2009), China’s regional innovation capacity in transition: An empirical approach, “Research Policy”, vol. 38, Issue 2, pp. 338–357.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/pp.2019.24.2.3