Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 6 | 293-306

Article title

Ustanie bytu prawnego spółki kapitałowej a wygaśnięcie jej długów

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
The end of the legal existence of a capital company and the expiration of its debts

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Under Polish law, indebted companies can be liquidated without satisfying all the creditors. Therefore, debts may remain without a debtor. This issue is controversial in the Polish judicature. One way of thinking considers debt to be so closely joined with the debtor that when the debtor’s existence ends with no successor, the debts also end their existence. The other opinion holds that debts of the liquidated company do not cease to exist and may be claimed from the guarantor. As a rule, in Polish law debt is not strictly connected to the debtor or creditor and a change of debtor or creditor is possible. An old Ius Commune rule nomina ossibus inhaerent is not recognized in Poland. Thus the opinion that debts do not vanish after the liquidation of a company is more correct from the dogmatic point of view. Such a stance is also supported by a recent change in the Law on National Court Register.
EN
Under Polish law, indebted companies can be liquidated without satisfying all the creditors. Therefore, debts may remain without a debtor. This issue is controversial in the Polish judicature. One way of thinking considers debt to be so closely joined with the debtor that when the debtor’s existence ends with no successor, the debts also end their existence. The other opinion holds that debts of the liquidated company do not cease to exist and may be claimed from the guarantor. As a rule, in Polish law debt is not strictly connected to the debtor or creditor and a change of debtor or creditor is possible. An old Ius Commune rule nomina ossibus inhaerent is not recognized in Poland. Thus the opinion that debts do not vanish after the liquidation of a company is more correct from the dogmatic point of view. Such a stance is also supported by a recent change in the Law on National Court Register.

Year

Volume

6

Pages

293-306

Physical description

Dates

published
2016-12-15

Contributors

author

References

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_ppuam_2016_6_19
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.