Lewica pozostawiona z TINA: Sztuka, alienacja i antykomunizm

• Authors: Angela Dimitrakaki

Title variants

EN

Left with TINA: Art, Alienation and Anti-Communism

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

PL

Prezentowany artykuł śledzi, w jaki sposób współczesne pole sztuki bywa nawiedzane przez kulturową i polityczną wyobraźnię właściwą dla czasów po 1989 roku, a uchwyconą w powieści Douglasa Couplanda Pokolenie X: Opowieści na czasy przyśpieszającej kultury (1991, 1998). Książka ta okazała się formacyjna z uwagi na prezentowane w niej stanowisko antypracy, jak również narrację wycofania w podziwie dla procesów przyspieszenia, która opisywała, jak zasady produkcji przekładają się na „oszołomione i zdezorientowane” style życia. Uprzywilejowanie przez przedstawicieli Pokolenia X perspektywy „mikrokosmosów” – gdzie wycofanie spotyka się z niskiej częstotliwości kolektywizmem – staje się jeszcze bardziej powszechne w kolejnych dekadach i utożsamione z demokracją realizowaną i idealizowaną w kategoriach polityki „anty” (w tym antyfaszyzmu), co znajduje liczne przykłady w polu sztuki w jego powiązaniu z etyczną lewicą. Stałe i gloryfikowane antagonizmy łączą w tym kontekście liberalne pole sztuki z polem społecznym, każdorazowo przepisując „anty” na TINA – zasadę „braku alternatywy” (ang. „there is no alternative” – TINA). TINA, jak argumentuję, przyjmuje szczególne figuracje w ramach przeważnie lewicowego obszaru sztuki, gdzie praktyki uwspólniania pozostają odcięte od polityki komunizmu, a technofilia – tak na gruncie, jak i poza polem sztuki – jest legitymizowana przez lewicę i prawicę jako substytut pragnienia komunizmu. Główne tezy artykułu prezentują się następująco: (a) opisane wyżej zjawiska są powiązane z politycznym procesem walki, którego głównym efektem jest alienacja – alienacja od wyobrażonego punktu końcowego owej walki; (b) wspomniana alienacja nie może być rozważana oddzielnie od hegemonii przyspieszenia, zwłaszcza w świetle traumatycznego wycofania z komunizmu i wycofania się samego komunizmu oraz stałego dla kapitalizmu przepracowywania prefiguratywnego antykomunizmu.

EN

The article traces the haunting of the contemporary art field by a post-1989 cultural and political imaginary captured in Douglas Coupland’s novel Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture (1991). This was a formative literary work for its anti-work stance but also the narrativisation of withdrawal in awe of processes of acceleration that saw production principles translating into “dazed and confused” lifestyles. The preference of Gen-Xers for “microcosms”, where withdrawal encountered low-fi collectivism, became more prevalent in subsequent decades and aligned with a democracy realised, and idealised, as the politics of “anti” (including anti-fascism) – exemplified in the art field in its association with an ethical left. Constant and glorified antagonisms join the liberal art field to the social field, forever re-scripting ‘anti’ as TINA – the principle that “there is no alternative”. TINA, it is argued, is assuming specific figurations within the largely left-inclined art terrain where commoning practices remain cut off from the propositional politics of communism while, both within and beyond the art field, technophilia is legitimised left and right as a substitute for the desire for communism. The main theses of the article are that: (a) such developments are intertwined with a political process of struggle that delivers alienation as their main outcome – that is, alienation from an imagined endpoint of the struggle and (b) that such alienation cannot be considered separately from the hegemony of acceleration in light of the traumatic withdrawal from, and of, communism and capitalism’s continuous re-working of prefigurative anti-communism.

Keywords

PL

sztuka współczesna; polityka anty; demokracja; alienacja; antykomunizm; Pokolenie X; akceleracjonizm; antyfaszyzm; etyczna lewica

EN

contemporary art; politics of anti; democracy; alienation; anti-communism; Generation X; accelerationism; anti-fascism; ethical left; contemporary art; politics of anti; democracy; alienation; anti-communism; Generation X; accelerationism; anti-fascism; ethical left

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Praktyka Teoretyczna
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 31
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 25-48

Dates

published

2019-05-08

Contributors

author

Angela Dimitrakaki

• School of History of Art University of Edinburgh Room 0.52, Hunter Building 74 Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9DF United Kingdom

References

• Abbing, Hans. 2002. Why Are Artists Poor? The Exceptional Economy of the Arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
• Aranda, Julieta, Anton Vidokle and Brian Kuan Wood (eds.). 2011. Are You Working Too Much? Post-Fordism, Precarity and the Labor of Art. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
• Beckett, Andy. 2017. “Accelerationism: How a Fringe Philosophy Predicted the Future”. The Guardian, May 11. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/11/accelerationism-how-a-fringe-philosophy-predicted-the-future-we-live-in.
• Bishop, Claire. 2004. “Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics”. October 110 (Fall): 51–79.
• Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. Trans. Simon Pleasance and Fiona Woods. Paris: Les presses du réel.
• Coupland, Douglas. 1991. Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
• Child, Danielle. 2019. Working Aesthetics: Labour, Art and Capitalism. London: Bloomsbury.
• Christie, Caroline. 2018. “Artist Luke Turner Withdraws from Athens Biennale over Heated Twitter Fiasco”. Document, September 6. nal.com/2018/09/artist-luke-turner-withdraws-from-athens-biennale-over-heated-twitter-fiasco/.
• Davis, Ben. 2013. 9.5 Theses on Art and Class. London: Haymarket.
• Dimitrakaki, Angela. 2015. “‘Elections Change Nothing’: On the Misery of the Democracy of Equivalence”. South as a State of Mind 14(1). https://www.documenta14.de/en/south/53_elections_change_nothing_on_the_misery_of_the_democracy_of_equivalence.
• Dimitrakaki, Angela. 2000. “Researching Culture/s and the Omitted Footnote: Questions on the Practice of Feminist Art History” (88–101). In Independent Practices: Representation, Location and History in Contemporary Visual Art, ed. Bryan Biggs, Angela Dimitrakaki and Juginder Lamba. Liverpool: Bluecoats Arts and Centre and Liverpool School of Art & Design.
• Dimitrakaki, Angela and Kirsten Lloyd. 2015. “‘The Last Instance’ – The Apparent Economy, Social Struggles and Art in Global Capitalism” (1–30). In ECONOMY: Art, Production and the Subject in the 21st Century, ed. Angela Dimitrakaki and Kirsten Lloyd.
• Dean, Jodi. 2015. “Donald Trump Is the Most Honest Candidate in American Politics Today: Where Other Candidates Appeal to a Fictitious Unity or Pretense of Moral Integrity, He Displays the Power of Inequality“. In These Times, August 12. http://inthesetimes.com/article/18309/donald-trump-republican-president.
• Dean, Jodi. 2012. The Communist Horizon. London: Verso.
• El Baroni, Bassam. 2017. “The Post-Agonistic Institution: Four Positions on the Structural Relation between Art and Democracy” (230–235). In How Institutions Think: Between Contemporary Art and Curatorial Discourse, ed. Paul O’Neill, Lucy Steeds and Mick Wilson. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Ellis-Petersen, Hanna. 2017. “Art Gallery Criticised over Neo-Nazi Artwork and Hosting Racist Speakers”. The Guardian, 22 February. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/feb/22/art-gallery-criticised-over-neo-nazi-artwork-and-hosting-racist-speakers.
• Federici, Silvia. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. New York: Autonomedia.
• Fisher, Mark. 2009. Capitalist Realism. New York: Zone Books.
• Foster, Hal. 1996. The Return of the Real: Art and Theory at the End of the Century. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Garside, Juliette, Jake Bernstein and Holly Watt. 2016. “How Offshore Firm Helped Billionaire Change the Art World for Ever”. The Guardian, April 7. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/07/panama-papers-joe-lewis-offshore-art-world-picasso-christies.
• Geras, Norman. 1988. “Ex-Marxism without Substance: Being a Real Reply to Laclau and Mouffe”. New Left Review 169: 34–61.
• Geras, Norman. 1987. “Post–Marxism?”. New Left Review 163: 40–82.
• Groys, Boris. 2014. “On Art Activism.” eflux journal 56. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/56/60343/on-art-activism/.
• Haas, Benjamin. 2018. “Student Activists Detained in China for Supporting Workers’ Rights.” The Guardian, November 12. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/12/ten-student-activists-detained-in-china-for-supporting-workers-rights.
• Harvey, David. 2007. “Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 610: 22–44.
• Havas, Deanna. 2016. “An Interview with Deanna Havas”. AQNB, August 15. https://www.aqnb.com/2016/08/15/an-interview-with-deanna-havas/.
• Hernandez, Javier C. 2018. “China’s Leaders Are Confronted with an Unlikely Foe: Ardent Young Communists”. The New York Times, September 28. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/28/world/asia/china-maoists-xi-protests.html.
• Hester, Helen. 2018. Xenofeminism. Cambridge: Polity.
• Holloway, John. 2002. How to Change the World without Taking Power. London: Pluto Press.
• Jameson, Fredric. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. London: Methuen & Co.
• Jameson, Fredric. 1991. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
• Kester, Grant. 2009. “Lessons in Futility: Francis Alÿs and the Legacy of May ‘68”. Third Text 23(4): 407–420.
• Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
• Lordon, Frédéric. 2014. Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza & Marx on Desire. Trans. Gabriel Ash. London: Verso. Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1983 [1974]. Libidinal Economy. Trans. Iain Hamilton Grant. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Miranda, Magally and Kyle Lane-McKinley. 2017. “Artwashing, or between Social Practice and Social Reproduction”. A Blade of Grass, February 1. http://www.abladeofgrass.org/fertile-ground/artwashing-social-practice-social-reproduction/.
• Majaca, Antonia and Jelena Vesić. 2017. “The Totalitarian Paradigm and the Making of Contemporary Art”. Public lecture, HKW Berlin, Sunday, December 10. https://www.hkw.de/en/programm/projekte/veranstaltung/p_136719.php
• Moody, Kim. 2018. “High Tech, Low Growth: Robots and the Future of Work”. Historical Materialism: Research in Critical Marxist Theory 26(4): 3–34.
• Neate, Patrick. 2007. “Generation X: The Slackers that Changed the World”. The Independent, February 18. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/generation-x-the-slackers-who-changed-the-world-436651.html.
• Negri, Antonio. 2019. “A 21st Century Fascist”. https://www.versobooks.com/blogs/4208-a-21st-century-fascist
• Noys, Benjamin. 2014. Malign Velocities: Accelerationism and Capitalism. Winchester: Zero Books.
• Παπαδόπουλος, Παύλος. 2018. «Πώς η Ελλάδα έγινε κομμουνιστική χώρα» [How Greece Became a Communist Country]. Καθημερινή, September 18. http://www.kathimerini.gr/984786/opinion/epikairothta/politikh/pws-h-ellada-egine-kommoynistikh-xwra.
• Riff, David and Dmitry Vilensky. 2009. “From Communism to Commons?”. Third Text 23(4): 465–480.
• Rifkin, Jeremy. 1995. The End of Work. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
• SDLD50. 2018. “The Biennial of Very Fine People, on Both Sides”. Metamute, September 12. http://www.metamute.org/community/your-posts/biennial-very-fine-people-both-sides.
• SDLD50. 2017. “Racism as Deep Trolling and Other New Centre Divisions”. SDLD50, April 4.
• https://shutdownld50.tumblr.com/post/159184519991/racism-as-deep-trolling-and-other-new-centre.
• Sholette, Gregory. 2010. Dark Matter: Art and Politics in the Age of Enterprise Culture. New York: Pluto Press.
• Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.
• Vishmidt, Marina. 2013. ‘“Mimesis of the Hardened and Alienated’: Social Practice as Business Model”. eflux journal 43.
• https://www.e-flux.com/journal/43/60197/mimesis-of-the-hardened-and-alienated-social-practice-as-business-model/.
• Yang, Yuan. 2019. “Inside China’s Crackdown on Young Marxists”. Financial Times Magazine, February 14.
• https://www.ft.com/content/fd087484-2f23-11e9-8744-e7016697f225.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/prt.2019.1.2