Umění a religiozita v esteticko-filozofickém systému Dmitrije Sergejeviče Merežkovského

• Authors: Jan Vorel

Title variants

EN

Art and Religiosity in the Aesthetic-Philosophical System of Dmitry Sergeyevich Merezhkovsky

• Languages of publication: CS

Abstracts

CS

The study is aimed on traces of religiosity in aesthetic-philosophical system of a Russian symbolistic poet,  prosaic  writer  and  thinker  D.S. Merezhkovsky.  The  study  analyses  selected Merezhkovsky’s works with focus on aesthetics, his essays, historiosophic prose and philosophic religious treatises. For Russian spiritual and art culture, importance of Merezhovsky is obvious, especially in connection with his effort to overcome crisis processes in religious, philosophical and art sphere, realized by means of synthesis and transcendence in modern culture.

EN

The study is aimed on traces of religiosity in aesthetic-philosophical system of a Russian symbolistic poet,  prosaic  writer  and  thinker  D.S.  Merezhkovsky.  The  study  analyses  selected Merezhkovsky’s works with focus on aesthetics, his essays, historiosophic prose and philosophic religious treatises. For Russian spiritual and art culture, importance of Merezhovsky is obvious, especially in connection with his effort to overcome crisis processes in religious, philosophical and art sphere, realized by means of synthesis and transcendence in modern culture.

Keywords

EN

Russian symbolism; theurgy; aesthetic-philosophical approaches; Hegelian concept of art; art and religion; synthesis in modern culture; work of art of D.S. Merezhkovsky; historiosophic prose

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Poznańskie Studia Slawistyczne
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 8

Dates

published

2015-01-01

Contributors

author

Jan Vorel

• Uniwersytet Ostrawski

References

• Broch H., 2009, Román-mýtus-kýč: eseje, přel. N. Macurová, Praha.
• Eliade M., 2004, Pojednání o dějinách náboženství, přel. J. Vacek, Praha.
• Losskij N.O., 2004, Dějiny ruské filozofie, přel. A. Černohous, Velehrad–Roma.
• Merežkovskij D.S., 1929, Tolstoj a Dostojevskij: život, tvorba, náboženství, přel. J. Bečka, Praha.
• Naldoniová L., 2010, Erós a jeho metamorfózy, Ostrava.
• Naldoniová L., 2012, Ruská sofiologie a věčné ženství, Ostrava.
• Řezníčková L., 2004,Moderna a historismus. Historické reprezentace v proměnách literatury na přelomu devatenáctého a dvacátého století, Praha.
• Zima P.V., 1995, Literární estetika, přel. J. Schneider, Olomouc.
• Бердяев Н.А., 1989, Новое христианство, in: Н.А. Бердяев, Собрание сочинений, sv. 3:Типы религиозной мысли в России, Париж.
• Викторович Д.О., 1999, Д. Мережковский: Преодоление декаданса (раздумья над романом о Леонардо да Винчи), Москва.
• Евлампиев И.И., 2014, История русской философии, Санкт-Петербург.
• Замалеева А.Ф. (ed.), 2012, История русской философии, Санкт-Петербург.
• Кулешова О.В., 2007, Притчи Дмитрия Мережковского. Единство философского и художественного, Москва.
• МережковскийД.С., 1914, Полное собрание сочинений, sv. 1, Москва.
• МережковскийД.С., 1914, Полное собрание сочинений, sv. 18, Москва.
• МережковскийД.С., 1999, Мысль и слово, Москва.
• МережковскийД.С., 1999, Тайна трех, Москва.
• Mихайлов О.Н., 2001, От Мережковского до Бродского. Литература Русккого зарубежья, Москва.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/pss.2015.8.24