Tourism development in the borderlands of Romania: A case study of the Danube Gorge–Iron Gates

• Authors: Andrei-Florin Băbăț , Sorin Pavel

Abstracts

EN

Border areas are a real challenge for tourism development. Usually associated with the periphery from a socio-economic point of view, these areas often have natural potential and attractive landscapes that have been little transformed by human activity and numerous historical and cultural tourist attractions. Although these areas have considerable tourism potential, this is not sufficient for the sustainable development of tourism and the exploitation of this potential is strongly influenced by the degree of permeability of the border. This is the case of the Romanian-Serbian border, which overlaps the most spectacular sector of the Danube – the Iron Gates Gorge. The main aim of this article is to analyse the role of tourism in the development of border areas and how it functions in a particular territorial context: the Danube Gorge located at the border between Romania and Serbia. The Romanian-Serbian border currently functions as an external border of the European Union in a favourable historical and political context, given the tradition of good neighbourliness between the two entities, the states located on either side of the Danube. However, the communist period altered the prospects for tourism development in this region through a very drastic and controlled border regime, even though the area benefited from major investment projects, such as the dam and hydroelectric power station at Porțile de Fier, built in the 1970s in cooperation with the former Yugoslavia. An analysis of the statistical data on tourism development shows that tourist traffic is on the increase, although there is a contradiction between the upward trend in tourist flows and the backwardness of large-scale tourist infrastructure, with the dominant type of accommodation being small, flexible, and rural accommodation that does not require large investments. The results presented in this article can be summarised in the general conclusion that the development of tourism in the Danube Gorge–Iron Gates remains dependent on the political factor and the border regime, even though the region has a remarkable tourism potential.

Keywords

EN

border; tourism; Danube Gorge; ecotourism; infrastructure

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 41
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 107-125

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Andrei-Florin Băbăț

• Department of Geography, University of Craiova, Craiova, Romania

• https://orcid.org/0000000295139931

author

Sorin Pavel

• Department of Geography, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara

• https://orcid.org/0000000320558207

References

• Abler R., Adams J.S., Gould P., 1972. Spatial organization. The geographer's view of the world. Prentice Hall, New York.
• Arreola D.D., Curtis J.R., 1993. The Mexican border cities: Landscape anatomy and place personality. University of Arizona Press, Tucson. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1q8tg4f
• Beeton S., 2006. Community development through tourism. CSIRO Publishing - Landlinks Press. DOI https://doi.org/10.1071/9780643093881
• Boyer M., 1996. L'invention du tourisme. Gallimard, Paris.
• Britton S.G., 1982. The political economy of tourism in the third world. Annals of Tourism Research 9(3): 331-358. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(82)90018-4
• Brunet-Jailly E., 2005. Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective. Geopolitics 10(4): 633-649. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449
• Butler R.W., 1996. The development of tourism in frontier regions: Issues and approaches. Frontiers in Regional Development: 213-220.
• Caccomo J.L. (ed.), 2007. Tourisme & frontières. l'Harmattan, Paris.
• Cândea M., Stăncioiu F.A., Mazilu M., Marinescu R.C., 2009. The competitiveness of the tourist destination on the future tourism market. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics 6(7): 374-384.
• Causevic S., Lynch M.P., 2013. Political (in)stability and its influence on tourism development. Tourism Management 34: 145-157. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.04.006
• Cazes G., 1992. Fondements pour une géographie du tourisme et des loisirs. Boréal.
• Clare G.A., Gunn T.V., 2002. Tourism planning. Basics, concepts, cases.
• Dewailly J.M., Flament E., 2000. Le Tourisme, SEDES, coll. Campus, Paris.
• Dorling D., 2010. Using statistics to describe and explore data, key methods in geography. Sage, London: 374-385.
• Dumbrăveanu D., 2004. Zona turistică Porțile de Fier: analiză geografică (The Iron Gates tourist area: Geografic analysis). Editura Universitară, Bukarest.
• Gallusser W.A. (ed.), 1994. Political boundaries and coexistence. Peter Lang, Bern, Switzerland.
• Hamilton L., 2001. International transboundary cooperation: Some best practice guidelines. In: Crossing boundaries in park management, proceedings of the 11th conference on research and resource management in parks and on public lands. Hancock, Michigan, The George Wright Society: 204-210.
• Hansen N., 1977. Border regions: A critique of spatial theory and a European case study. Annals of Regional Science 15: 1-14. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01287245
• Haselsberger B., 2014. Decoding borders. Appreciating border impacts on space and people. Planning Theory & Practice 15(4): 505-526. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.963652
• Herța L.M., 2011. Relațiile româno-iugoslave în perioada 1950-1970. Rezumatul tezei de doctorat (Romanian-Yugoslav relations between 1950 and 1970. PhD thesis abstract). Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca.
• Herța L.M., 2015. The violent conflicts in former Yugoslavia and the vacillations of the West: Transatlantic discourse constructions of the Yugoslav wars. On-line Journal Modelling the New Europe 17: 164-185.
• Hjalager A.M., 2007. Stages in the economic globalization of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 34(2): 437-457. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.10.006
• Holger F., 2016. Tourism policy applied by the European Union to support cross-bordered tourism, in tourism and borders. Routledge: 19-30.
• Huggins R., 2003. Creating a UK competitiveness index: Regional and local benchmarking. Regional Studies 37(1): 89-96. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000033420
• Iațu C., Ibănescu B.C., Stoleriu O.-M., Munteanu A., 2018. The WHS Designation - a factor of sustainable tourism growth for Romanian rural areas? Sustainability 10: 626. DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030626
• Ihab H., 1985. The culture of postmodernism. SAGE Journals 2(3): 119-131. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276485002003010
• Johann S., Doina M., 2008. The silent tombs. Stories from the bloodiest border in Europe. Gilde & Köster Publishing House, Troisdorf.
• Keck-Szajbel M.A., 2013. The borders of friendship: Transnational travel and tourism in the East Bloc, 1972-1989. California Digital Library.
• Knafou R., Stock M., 2003. Tourisme. In: Lévy J., Lussault M. (eds), Dictionaire de la Géographie. Belin, Paris: 931-933.
• Laurier E., 2010. Participant observation, key methods in geography. SAGE, London: 116-130.
• Leiper N., 1990. Tourist attraction systems. Annals of Tourism Research 17(3): 367-384. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(90)90004-B
• Lew A., 1987. A framework of tourist attraction research. Annals of Tourism Research 14: 553-575. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(87)90071-5
• Light D., 2000. An unwanted past: Contemporary tourism and the heritage of communism in Romania. Tourism Geographies 2: 157-176. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14616680050027879
• Manea G., 2003. Naturalitate şi antropizare în parcul Natural Porţile de Fier (Naturalness and anthropisation in the Iron Gates Natural Park). Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti, Bucureşti.
• Menković L., Košćal M., 1997. Geomorphological features and morphogenesis of Djerdap gorge. In: International Symposium on Geology in the Danube Gorges. Geoinstitut, Donji Milanovac/Orsova: 89-98.
• Mitchell L.S., Murphy P.E., 1991. Geography and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 18(1): 57-70. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(91)90039-E
• Moscovici I.F., 2013. La France et le Banat entre 1916-1919, les convulsions de la Guerre et de la paix. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Strasbourg.
• Muntele I., Iațu C., 2003. Geografia turismului: concept, metode și forme de manifestare spațio-temporală (Geography of tourism: Concept, methods and forms of spatio-temporal manifestation). Sedcom Libris, Iași.
• Necşuliu R., Necşuliu G., 2005. Demographic characteristics of Romanian natural parks. Annals of the University of Craiova, Series Geography. Editura Universitaria, Craiova: 72-82.
• Newman D., Paasi A., 1998. Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography 22(2): 186-207. DOI https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
• Ogborn M., 2010. Finding historical sources. Key methods in geography. SAGE, London: 89-102.
• Passi A., 2000. Reconstructing regions and regional identity. Nijmegen: Nethur Lecture 7(1): 1-9.
• Pătroescu M., Necșuliu R., 2008. Le Danube dans le secteur du Défilé des Portes de Fer. Vers la création d'une réserve transfrontalière Portes de Fer - Djerdap? Balkanologie X(1-2): 1-17. DOI https://doi.org/10.4000/balkanologie.391
• Pătroescu M., Vintilă G., 1997. Natural, cultural and historical potential for tourism of the Iron Gate national park in Romania. Geographica Panonica 1: 26-38.
• Pearce D., 1993. Géographie du tourisme. Nathan, Paris.
• Phillips A., 2002. Management guidelines for IUCN category V protected areas, protected landscapes/seascapes. IUCN, Gland. DOI https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2002.PAG.9.en
• Pumain D., Saint-Julien T., 1997. L'analyse spatiale. Localisation dans l'espace. Armand Colin, Paris.
• Richards G., 2002. Tourism attraction systems: Exploring cultural behaviour. Annals of Tourism Research 29(4): 1048-1064. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00026-9
• Ricq C., 2000. Manual de cooperare transfrontalieră pentru uzul colectivităților locale și regionale în Europa (Handbook of cross-border cooperation for the use of local and regional authorities in Europe). Information and Documentation Centre of the Council of Europe in Bucharest, Bucharest.
• Sandwith T., Shine C., Hamilton L., Sheppard D., 2001. Transboundary protected areas for peace and co-operation. IUCN, Gland et Cambridge.
• Smith V.L., Eadington W.R., 1992. Tourism alternatives: Potentials and problems in the development of tourism. International Academy for the Study of Tourism. University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512807462
• Timothy D.J., 2002. Tourism and political boundaries. Routledge Advances in Tourism, London and New York. DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203214480
• Weidenfeld A., 2013. Tourism and cross border regional innovation systems. Annals of Tourism Research 42: 191-213. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.01.003
• Westra L., Crabbe P., Holland A., Ryczkowski L., 2000. Implementing ecological integrity: Restoring global and regional environmental and human health. NATO Scientific Publications, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5876-3
• Więckowski M., 2010. Tourism development in the borderlands of Poland. Geographia Polonica 83(2): 67-81. DOI https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2010.2.5
• Zbicz D.C., 2000. Transfrontier ecosystems and internationally adjoining protected areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge.
• Zbicz D.C., Green M., 1997. Status of the world's transfrontier protected areas. Parks 7(3): 5-10.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/quageo-2022-0037

Biblioteka Nauki

15805230