2012 | 5 | 25-46
Article title

Wielka Gra” na Oceanie Indyjskim. Chiny, Indie i Stany Zjednoczone w regionalnej rywalizacji mocarstw

Title variants
Languages of publication
The Indian Ocean constitutes an area which is rich in resources and vital to shipping. In this region there are some strategic sealines that enable communication of China and India with this resourceful area. Due to the fact that the Indian Ocean region is rich in oil, China and India seek dominance in this part of the world. The article explains and describes the dynamic of greatpower rivalry in various aspects. It also analyzes the role of the Unites States as stabilizing power in the new political and economic environment in Asia.
Physical description
  • Dane na temat wzrostu gospodarczego Chin i Indii ze źródeł Banku Światowego,
  •, 03.06.2011 r.
  • M. Li, The rise of China and the demise of the capitalist world-economy, London 2006; A. Harney, Chińska cena. Prawdziwy koszt chińskiej przewagi konkurencyjnej, Katowice 2009; R. Meredith, The Elephant and the Dragon, New York 2007
  • B. Chellaney, Asian Juggernaut: The rise of China, India and Japan, New York 2010
  • S. Craig, Chinese perceptions of traditional and nontraditional threats, SSI USAWC, March 2007
  • E. Medeiros, China’s international behavior. Activism, opportunism, and diversification, Santa Monica 2009
  • P. Engardio, Chindia: How China and India are revolutionizing global business, New York 2007
  • Leksykon współczesnych międzynarodowych stosunków politycznych, red. C. Mojsiewicz, Wrocław 2007
  • F. Leverett, J. Bader, Managing China-U.S. energy competition in the Middle East, „The Washington Quarterly”, vol. 29, no. 1 (Winter 2005-06)
  • Middle East, „The Washington Quarterly”, vol. 29, no. 1 (Winter 2005-06), s. 187–201;
  • K. Morrison, China and India raise the stakes, „Financial Times” z 08.01.2005 r..
  • P. Goodman, China invests heavily in Sudan’s oil industry. Beijing supplies arms used on villagers, „The Washington Post” z 23.12.2004 r..
  • C. Fair, Indo-Iranian security ties: Thicker than oil, „Middle East Review of International Affairs”, vol. 11, no. 1 (March 2007),
  • S. Blank, Natural allies? Regional security in Asia and prospects for indo-american strategic cooperation, USAWC ISS, September 2005
  • E. Haliżak, Spór o archipelagi na Morzu Południowochińskim – znaczenie dla międzynarodowego prawa morza i bezpieczeństwa w regionie, [w:] Prawo, instytucje i polityka w procesie globalizacji. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Januszowi Simonidesowi, red. E. Haliżak, R. Kuźniar, Warszawa 2003
  • K. Kubiak, Incydent na wodach wysp Senkaku, „Raport-wto” 2010, nr 11
  • O. Saleem, The Spratly Islands dispute. China defines the New Millennium, „American University International Law Review” 2000,
  • vol. 15, no. 3
  • C. Daniel, Kissinger warns of energy conflict, „Financial Times” z 02.06.2005
  • SIPRI Yearbook 2011: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, Oxford 2011
  • C. Pehrson, String of pearls: meeting the challenge of China’s rising power across the Asian littoral, USAWC ISS, July 2006
  • A. Scobell, The PLA at home and abroad: assessing the operational capabilities of China’s military, USAWC ISS, June 2010
  • Z. Śliwa, D. Brążkiewicz, Piractwo wyzwaniem dla bezpieczeństwa, „Kwartalnik Bellona” 2010, nr 2
  • Z. Śliwa, Marynarka Wojenna Chin w walce z piratami, „Przegląd Morski” 2010, nr 7
  • R. Czulda, Nowe wyzwania i zagrożenia na obszarach morskich, „Przegląd Morski” 2009, nr 1
  • S. Niedziela, Indie – nowe mocarstwo światowe, „Przegląd Morski” 2009, nr 6, s. 9; R. Rai, China’s String of Pearls vs India’s Iron Curtain, „Indian Defence Review” 2009, vol. 24, no. 4,, 12.05.2011 r.
  • K. Kubiak, Gwadar – pakistański problem ChRL, „Raport-wto” 2010, nr 3
  • J. Nehru, Odkrycie Indii, Warszawa 1957
  • J. Holslag, China, India and the military security dilemma, „BICCS Asia Paper”, vol. 3, no. 5
  • E. Wong, Chinese warship may be nearly ready, „New York Times” z 08.04.2011 r
  • Por. D. Lai, Chinese military going global, „China Security” 2009, vol. 5, no. 1,
  • C. Jean, Geopolityka, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków 2003
  • C. Mojsiewicz, Państwa regionu Pacyfiku w polityce i gospodarce światowej, [w:] Stosunki międzynarodowe, red. W. Malendowski, C. Mojsiewicz, Wrocław 2004,
  • R. Kaplan, Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the future of American power, New York 2010
  • R. O’Rourke, China naval modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy capabilities-background and issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service Report RL33153, Washington DC, 22 April 2011, s. 38-40., 10.06.2011 r..
  • B. Alkire, J. Birkler, L. Dolan, J. Dryden, B. Mason, G. Lee, J. Schank,
  • M. Hayes, Littoral Combat Ships. Relating performance to mission package inventories, homeports, and installation sites, RAND Corp, Santa Monica 2007
  • R. Cliff, M. Burles, M. Chase,
  • D. Eaton, K. Pollpeter, Entering the Dragon’s Lair. Chinese antiacces strategy and their implications for the United States, RAND Corp., Santa Monica 2007
  • W. Łuczak, Kryzys amerykańskich wydatków wojskowych, „Raport-wto” 2011, nr 12
  • S. Stolberg, J. Yardley, Countering China, Obama backs India for U.N. Council, „New York Times” z 09.11.2010 r.
  • � C. Bajpaee, China-India relations. Regional rivalry takes the world stage, „China Security” 2010, vol. 6, no. 2,
  • S. Adhikari, A. Sinha, M. Kamle, India’s changing geopolitical code: an attempt at analysis, “Geopolitics Quarterly” 2008, vol. 3, no 4,
  • K. A. Kronstadt, Pakistan-US relations, Congressional Research Service Report RL33498, Washington DC, 6 February 2009, s. 24-30, 57-61., 10.06.2011 r.
  • R. Naseer, M. Amin, Sino-Pakistan relations. A natural alliance against common threats, „Berkeley Journal of Social Sciences” 2011, vol. 1, no. 2
  • H. Sokolski, Gauging US-Indian strategic cooperation, USAWC ISS, March 2007
  • O. Meier, The US-India nuclear deal. The end of universal non-proliferation efforts ?, „Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft” 2006, nr 4, s. 28-41., 10.05.2011 r.
  • J. Newhouse, Diplomacy, Inc. The influence of lobbies on U.S. foreign policy, „Foreign Affairs” 2009, vol. 88, no. 3,
  • SIPRI Yearbook 1995: Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, Oxford 1995
  • K. Archick, R. Grimmett, S. Kan, European Union’s arms embargo on China. Implications and options for U.S. policy, Congressional Research Service Report RL32870, Washington DC, 27 May 2005, s. 6-8,, 10.04.2011 r.
  • � U.S.-China Joint Statement, The White House - Office of the Press Secretary, November 17, 2009,, 14.04.2011 r.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.