10 lat negocjacji akcesyjnych Turcji z Unią Europejską. Analiza postępów w obszarze kryteriów politycznych na podstawie raportów Komisji Europejskiej

• Authors: Przemysław Osiewicz

Title variants

EN

Ten years of accession negotiations between Turkey and the European Union. The analysis of provisions as regards the political criteria on the basis of reports by the European Commission

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

October 2015 marked the tenth anniversary of the official onset of the accession negotiations between Turkey and the European Union. The outcome of the talks, however, has so far been more than modest. The negotiations have encompassed fourteen out of 35 fields, leading to the closure, albeit only preliminary, of only one field. Croatia started negotiations in the same year and has been EU member state for two years now. In the Turkish case, the end of the talks is nowhere to be seen, and the more time goes by the less likely it seems for Turkey to become a legitimate participant of a European integration process. The EU Commission continues to present a number of reservations as concerns the progress of Turkey on its path to accession. The aim of this paper is to attempt to find an answer to the question whether the catalogue of reservations brought up by the EU Commission in terms of the political criteria to be met by Turkey has changed after the nine years of negotiations. By this token it will become possible to determine the progress Turkey has made as concerns those political criteria, both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Keywords

PL

Turkey; accession negotiations; the Cyprus question; EU enlargement; European Commission

EN

Turkey; accession negotiations; the Cyprus question; EU enlargement; European Commission; Turkey; accession negotiations; the Cyprus question; EU enlargement; European Commission

• Publisher: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
• Journal: Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 9
• Pages: 199-213

Dates

published

2015-06-15

Contributors

author

Przemysław Osiewicz

• Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

References

• Alkan I. (2015), Cizre’de Edin ailesi kur°unlara hedef oldu: 2 ölü, http://www.zaman.com.tr/gundem_cizrede-edin-ailesi-kursunlara-hedef-oldu-2-olu_2315861.html, 11.09.2015.
• Anderson P. (2009), Nach Atatürk. Die Türken, ihr Staat und Europa, Berenburg, Berlin.
• Bahcheli T., Noel N. (2009), The Rise o f the AK Party and Ankara ’s Changing Role: Paving the Way for the ‘Yes’, w: Reunifying Cyprus: the Annan Plan and Beyond, red. A. Varnava,
• H. Faustmann, I. B. Tauris, London.
• Baydar M. N. (2004), Avrupa Birligi - Türkiye & Kuzey Kibris Türk Cumhuriyeti, Beta Basim, Istanbul.
• Bogdani M. (2011), Turkey and the Dilemma o f EU Accession: When Religion Meets Politics, I.B. Tauris, London.
• Cagaptay S. (2014), The Rise o f Turkey: The Twenty-first Century’s First Muslim Power, Potomac Books, Lincoln.
• Cizre Ü. (2013), A New Politics o f Engagement: The Turkish Military, Society, and the AKP, w: Democracy, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey, red. A. T. Kuru, A. Stepan, Columbia University Press, New York.
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2014-15 (2014), Brussels, 8.10.2014, C0M(2014) 700 final.
• Davutoglu A. (2001), Stratejik derinlik: Türkiye’nin uluslararasi konumu, Küre Yaymlari, Istanbul.
• Dismorr A. (2008), Turkey Decoded, Saqi, London.
• Duff A. (2014), Turkey’s EU accession negotiations should now be suspended, http://www.euractiv.com/sections/europes-east/turkeys-eu-accession-negotiations-should-now-be-suspended-310855, 16.12.2014.
• ECtHR releases 2014figures: Turkey’s violations accountfor more than the other 46 states combined (2015), http://www.todayszaman.com/anasayfa_ecthr-releases-2014-figures-turkeys-violations-account-for-more-than-the-other-46-states-combined_371281.html, 19.08.2015.
• Forysiński W. (2008), The Europeanization o f the Cyprus Problem: Beyond the Catalyst Effect, w: Proceedings o f the Sixth International Congress on Cyprus Studies, red. U. V. Osam, Eastern
• Mediterranean University Press, Famagusta.
• Fuller G. E. (2010), The New Turkish Republic: Turkey as a Pivotal State in the Muslim World, United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington D.C.
• Keyman E. F., Gumuscu S. (2014), Democracy, Identity, and Foreign Policy in Turkey: Hegemony Through Transformation, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
• Konkluzje Prezydencji, Rada Europejska w Brukseli 14-15 grudnia 2006, Bruksela, 15 grudnia 2006, 16879/06, Concl 3.
• Kyriakou M. X. (1989), Kryzys egejski, Młodzieżowa Agencja Wydawnicza, Warszawa.
• Laęiner S. (2005), Possible Impacts o f Turkey’s Full Membership to EU’s Foreign Policy, w: European Union with Turkey: The Possible Impact o f Turkey s Membership on the European Union,
• red. S. Laęiner, M. Ozcan, I. Bal, ISRO Publication, Ankara.
• Lagendijk J. (2012), Turkey’s Accession to the European Union and the Role o f the Justice and Development Party, w: Democracy, Islam, and Secularism in Turkey, red. A. T. Kuru, A. Stepan,
• Columbia University Press, New York.
• Mattei de R. (2009), Turcja w Europie. Dobrodziejstwo czy katastrofa?, Stowarzyszenie Kultury Chrześcijańskiej, Kraków.
• Negotiating Framework (2005), Luxembourg, 3 October 2005.
• Negotiations Overview - Turkey (2015), http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/enlargement_process/accession_process/how_does_a_country_join_the_eu/negotiations_croatia_turkey/overview_negotiations_tr_en.pdf, 13.08.2015.
• Osiewicz P. (2013), Konflikt cypryjski, Wydawnictwo PWN, Warszawa.
• Osiewicz P. (2006), Spory grecko-tureckie w basenie Morza Egejskiego, w: Spory - konflikty zbrojne - terroryzm. Dysfunkcjonalne czynniki współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych, red.
• W. Malendowski, Wydawnictwo Naukowe INPiD UAM, Poznań.
• Ozbudun E., Hale W. (2010), Turkiye ’de Islamcilik, Demokrasi ve Liberalizm. AKP Olayi, Dogan Kitap, Istanbul.
• Ozcan G. (2004), Turkey s Changing Neighbourhood Policy, Friedriech Ebert Stiftung Istanbul, Briefing
• Paper September 2004.
• Park B. (2012), Modern Turkey: People, State and Foreign Policy in a Globalized World, Routledge, Abingdon.
• Refah (The Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey (2003), [41340/98 41342/98 41343/98 41344/98] 13th February 2003.
• Robins P. (2003), Suits and Uniforms: Turkish Foreign Policy since the Cold War, Hurst & Company, London.
• Shankland D. (2005), Islam, Politics and Democracy in Turkey, w: The EU & Turkey: A Glittering Prize or a Milestone?, red. M. Lake, Federal Trust for Education and Research, London.
• Sozen A. (2008), The Cyprus Negotiations and the Basic Parameters: An Overview of the Inter-communal Negotiations, w: The Cyprus Conflict: Looking Ahead, red. A. Sozen, Eastern Mediterranean University Press, Famagusta.
• Szymański A. (2008), Między islamem a kemałizmem. Problem demokracji w Turcji, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, Warszawa.
• Szymański A. (2011), Wprowadzenie, w: Turcja i Europa. Wyzwania i szanse, red. A. Szymański, Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych, Warszawa.
• The Report. Turkey 2008 (2008), Oxford Business Group, Oxford.
• Traktat o Unii Europejskiej (2010), C 83, 30.03.2010.
• Turkey (2015), http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/turkey/index_en.htm, 13.08.2015.
• Turkey 2005 Progress Report (2005), C0M(2005) 561 final, 9.11.2005.
• Turkey 2014 Progress Report (2014), SWD(2014) 307 final, 8.10.2014.
• White J. (2013), Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
• Wódka J. (2011), Polityka zagraniczna Turcji. Uwarunkowania wewnętrzne oraz podmioty decyzyjne, ISP PAN/Wydawnictwo Trio, Warszawa.
• Vardan Ö. C. (2009), Turkey-EU Relations and Democracy in Turkey: Problems and Prospects, „Turkish Policy Quarterly”, vol. 8, nr 1.
• Zürcher E. J. (2013), Turcja. Od sułtanatu do współczesności, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków.

Identifiers

DOI

10.14746/rie.2015.9.13