Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 14 | 141-151

Article title

The Cyprus Talks 2015–2017: Their Course, the Outcome, and Consequences for the European Union

Content

Title variants

PL
Rokowania cypryjskie 2015–2017. Przebieg, rezultat oraz konsekwencje dla Unii Europejskiej

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The main aim of the article is to present political consequences of the failure of the Cyprus talks 2015–2017 for the European Union. Although its institutions and representatives were engaged in the negotiation process there, the issue seems to be more complex when it comes to defining what their role was. One can find the answer to such a question analysing the course and the final outcome of the negotiation process in Cyprus. The main research question are as follows: What was the course of bicommunal negotiations? What brought the negotiations to a halt in 2017? How did the European Union engage in the process? What are political consequences of the talks failure for the European Union? The selected method is sources analysis and the technique is qualitative content analysis. On this basis one can study, for example, selected speeches, declarations as well as official documents. As regards the main sources, these are selected EU and UN documents, monographs, and academic articles.
PL
Głównym celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie politycznych konsekwencji niepowodzenia negocjacji pokojowych na Cyprze w latach 2015–2017 dla Unii Europejskiej. Chociaż przedstawiciele Unii oraz jej instytucji byli zaangażowani w proces negocjacyjny, pozostaje pytanie o rolę, jaką odegrali w jego ramach. Aby znaleźć odpowiedź na to pytanie, należy przeanalizować zarówno przebieg, jak i rezultat prowadzonych rozmów. Główne pytania badawcze brzmią następująco: jaki był przebieg rozmów pomiędzy przedstawicielami obu cypryjskich społeczności? Co zdecydowało o ich niepowodzeniu i zerwaniu w 2017 toku? W jaki sposób Unia Europejska zaangażowała się w dialog pomiędzy stronami? Jakie są konsekwencje braku porozumienia dla UE? Wybraną metodą badawczą jest analiza źródeł, natomiast techniką badawczą – jakościowa analiza treści aktów prawnych, monografii i artykułów naukowych. Podstawę źródłową stanowią wybrane dokumenty Unii Europejskiej i Organizacji Narodów Zjednoczonych, monografie i opracowania oraz artykuły naukowe.

Year

Issue

14

Pages

141-151

Physical description

Dates

published
2020-12-31

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

References

  • Ambitious and proactive: Özersay steps into limelight (2019), “Cyprus Mail”, 23.06.2019.
  • Christou J. (2018), Anastasiades: failure of talks not Greek Cypriots’ fault, “Cyprus Mail”, 30.05.2018.
  • Christou J. (2017), Details of the framework paper issued by UN Secretary General, “Cyprus Mail”, 5.07.2017.
  • Council Regulation (2006) No. 389/2006 of 27 February 2006 establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000 on the European Agency for Reconstruction, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/2018-aid-programme-annex_en.pdf, 15.07.2019.
  • Cyprus Settlement Process Under the Juncker Commission: A Timeline (2017).
  • Ekici T. (2019), The Political and Economic History of North Cyprus: A Discordant Polity, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  • Forysiński W. (2008), The Europeanization of the Cyprus Problem: Beyond the Catalyst Effect, in: Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Cyprus Studies, ed. Ü. V. Osam, Eastern Mediterranean University Publications, Famagusta.
  • Gramer R., Surana K. (2017), Cracking the Cyprus Code, “Foreign Policy”, 14.03.2017.
  • Günal A. (2018), What does Turkey want from Cyprus?, in: Cyprus and the Roadmap for Peace: A Critical Interrogation of the Conflict, eds. M. S. Michael, Y. Vural, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
  • Ioannou G. (2017), The Cyprus Negotiations: What Went Wrong, IPI Global Observatory, https://theglobalobservatory.org/2017/07/cyprus-peace-process-greece-turkey/, 11.07.2019.
  • Martin H. (2006), Kings of Peace, Pawns of War: The untold story of peace-making, Continnuum, London.
  • Ioannidou L. (2019), Akinci calls on Anastasiades to participate in five-party meeting, “Cyprus Mail”, 21.06.2019.
  • Joint declaration on Cyprus (2014), UN Cyprus Talks, http://www.uncyprustalks.org/11-february-2014-joint-declaration-on-cyprus/, 9.07.2019.
  • Lindahl I. (2019), Notes from the Graveyard of Diplomats: Cyprus 2002–2004, Heterotopia, Nicosia.
  • Michael M. S.; Vural Y. (2018), A new approach to an old conflict – identyfing the problem and imagining a solution, in: Cyprus and the Roadmap for Peace: A Critical Interrogation of the Conflict, eds. M. S. Michael, Y. Vural, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
  • Nicosia expects momentum on Cyprus talks after Greek elections (2019), “Cyprus Mail”, 7.07.2019.
  • Note to Correspondents – Statement from the Conference on Cyprus (2017), United Nations Secretary General, https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/note-correspondents/2017-01-12/note-correspondents-statement-conference-cyprus, 14.07.2019.
  • Protocol 10 on Cyprus (2003), Official Journal L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 955.
  • Report of the Secretary General on his mission of good offices in Cyprus (2017), S/2017/814, 28.09.2017.
  • Report of the Secretary General on his mission of good offices in Cyprus (2019), S/2019/322, 16.04.2019.
  • Report of the Secretary General: Progress towards a settlement in Cyprus (2018), S/2018/610, 14.06.2018.
  • Skoutaris N. (2011), The Cyprus Issue: The Four Freedoms in a Member State Under Siege, Hart Publishing, Oxford.
  • Smith K. E. (2014), European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  • The EU’s role in the Cyprus Settlement Process: Questions and Answers (2017), European Commission, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-52_en.htm.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_14746_rie_2020_14_9
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.